Reimbursement of surgical procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia: Are we disincentivizing complex care?

Gopal Narang, Daniel Kellner, Amy Krambeck, Mitchell Humphreys

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose of reviewTo provide an overview of how surgical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) procedures are compensated in the United States and the implications of the current reimbursement system on the care of patients.Recent findingsThe resource-based relative value care system is Medicare's current reimbursement model. There is strong evidence that the current system does not adequately account for complex care. Consequently, for BPH surgical procedures, treatment options best suited for complex patients are not adequately reimbursed which may have implications on healthcare delivery and outcomes.SummaryInadequate reimbursement for certain BPH procedures may disincentivize the care of complex patients. Procedures such a holmium laser enucleation of the prostate are well suited for complex patients but have a steep learning curve. The incentive to learn and offer such procedures to complex patients may be unfairly influenced by reimbursement levels, which in the end penalizes patients and the treatments available to them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)318-323
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Urology
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2022

Keywords

  • RVU
  • benign prostatic hyperplasia
  • holmium laser enucleation of the prostate
  • reimbursement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reimbursement of surgical procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia: Are we disincentivizing complex care?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this