Regulatory and educational initiatives fail to promote discussions regarding end-of-life care

Andrew F. Shorr, Alexander Niven, David E. Katz, Joseph M. Parker, Arn H. Eliasson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We conducted an observational cohort study to determine if hospital-based, reinforcing regulatory and educational interventions could encourage physicians to discuss end-of-life (EOL) care with their patients. Specifically, we measured the effect of (1) administrative prompts to encourage discussions about EOL care and (2) a mandatory educational seminar focusing on EOL issues. Study subjects were patients consecutively admitted to the medicine service who faced an anticipated 3-year mortality rate of at least 50%. The main study endpoint was the frequency of documented EOL discussions between physicians and patients. In the inception cohort of 184 patients, physicians discussed EOL care with 64 patients (34.8%), and in the follow-up cohort of 121 patients, 41 individuals (33.9%) had documented discussions regarding EOL issues (P = 0.90). Actual 'Do Not Resuscitate'(DNR) orders were written for 53 patients (28.8%) in the inception cohort and for 33 persons (27.3%) in the follow-up cohort (P = 0.71). We conclude that enhanced, mutually reinforcing regulatory and educational efforts focusing on EOL care proved ineffectual at promoting either discussions about EOL issues or the use of DNR orders. Copyright (C) 2000 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)168-173
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Terminal Care
Resuscitation Orders
Physicians
Observational Studies
Cohort Studies
Medicine
Mortality

Keywords

  • Do not resuscitate orders
  • Education
  • End-of-life care
  • Patient Self Determination Act

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Regulatory and educational initiatives fail to promote discussions regarding end-of-life care. / Shorr, Andrew F.; Niven, Alexander; Katz, David E.; Parker, Joseph M.; Eliasson, Arn H.

In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.03.2000, p. 168-173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shorr, Andrew F. ; Niven, Alexander ; Katz, David E. ; Parker, Joseph M. ; Eliasson, Arn H. / Regulatory and educational initiatives fail to promote discussions regarding end-of-life care. In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2000 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 168-173.
@article{97a74b8396b54e09ba57d73a1f45ddb9,
title = "Regulatory and educational initiatives fail to promote discussions regarding end-of-life care",
abstract = "We conducted an observational cohort study to determine if hospital-based, reinforcing regulatory and educational interventions could encourage physicians to discuss end-of-life (EOL) care with their patients. Specifically, we measured the effect of (1) administrative prompts to encourage discussions about EOL care and (2) a mandatory educational seminar focusing on EOL issues. Study subjects were patients consecutively admitted to the medicine service who faced an anticipated 3-year mortality rate of at least 50{\%}. The main study endpoint was the frequency of documented EOL discussions between physicians and patients. In the inception cohort of 184 patients, physicians discussed EOL care with 64 patients (34.8{\%}), and in the follow-up cohort of 121 patients, 41 individuals (33.9{\%}) had documented discussions regarding EOL issues (P = 0.90). Actual 'Do Not Resuscitate'(DNR) orders were written for 53 patients (28.8{\%}) in the inception cohort and for 33 persons (27.3{\%}) in the follow-up cohort (P = 0.71). We conclude that enhanced, mutually reinforcing regulatory and educational efforts focusing on EOL care proved ineffectual at promoting either discussions about EOL issues or the use of DNR orders. Copyright (C) 2000 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee.",
keywords = "Do not resuscitate orders, Education, End-of-life care, Patient Self Determination Act",
author = "Shorr, {Andrew F.} and Alexander Niven and Katz, {David E.} and Parker, {Joseph M.} and Eliasson, {Arn H.}",
year = "2000",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0885-3924(00)00108-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "168--173",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Symptom Management",
issn = "0885-3924",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulatory and educational initiatives fail to promote discussions regarding end-of-life care

AU - Shorr, Andrew F.

AU - Niven, Alexander

AU - Katz, David E.

AU - Parker, Joseph M.

AU - Eliasson, Arn H.

PY - 2000/3/1

Y1 - 2000/3/1

N2 - We conducted an observational cohort study to determine if hospital-based, reinforcing regulatory and educational interventions could encourage physicians to discuss end-of-life (EOL) care with their patients. Specifically, we measured the effect of (1) administrative prompts to encourage discussions about EOL care and (2) a mandatory educational seminar focusing on EOL issues. Study subjects were patients consecutively admitted to the medicine service who faced an anticipated 3-year mortality rate of at least 50%. The main study endpoint was the frequency of documented EOL discussions between physicians and patients. In the inception cohort of 184 patients, physicians discussed EOL care with 64 patients (34.8%), and in the follow-up cohort of 121 patients, 41 individuals (33.9%) had documented discussions regarding EOL issues (P = 0.90). Actual 'Do Not Resuscitate'(DNR) orders were written for 53 patients (28.8%) in the inception cohort and for 33 persons (27.3%) in the follow-up cohort (P = 0.71). We conclude that enhanced, mutually reinforcing regulatory and educational efforts focusing on EOL care proved ineffectual at promoting either discussions about EOL issues or the use of DNR orders. Copyright (C) 2000 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee.

AB - We conducted an observational cohort study to determine if hospital-based, reinforcing regulatory and educational interventions could encourage physicians to discuss end-of-life (EOL) care with their patients. Specifically, we measured the effect of (1) administrative prompts to encourage discussions about EOL care and (2) a mandatory educational seminar focusing on EOL issues. Study subjects were patients consecutively admitted to the medicine service who faced an anticipated 3-year mortality rate of at least 50%. The main study endpoint was the frequency of documented EOL discussions between physicians and patients. In the inception cohort of 184 patients, physicians discussed EOL care with 64 patients (34.8%), and in the follow-up cohort of 121 patients, 41 individuals (33.9%) had documented discussions regarding EOL issues (P = 0.90). Actual 'Do Not Resuscitate'(DNR) orders were written for 53 patients (28.8%) in the inception cohort and for 33 persons (27.3%) in the follow-up cohort (P = 0.71). We conclude that enhanced, mutually reinforcing regulatory and educational efforts focusing on EOL care proved ineffectual at promoting either discussions about EOL issues or the use of DNR orders. Copyright (C) 2000 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee.

KW - Do not resuscitate orders

KW - Education

KW - End-of-life care

KW - Patient Self Determination Act

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034019569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034019569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0885-3924(00)00108-1

DO - 10.1016/S0885-3924(00)00108-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 10760621

AN - SCOPUS:0034019569

VL - 19

SP - 168

EP - 173

JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

SN - 0885-3924

IS - 3

ER -