Regular use of a verbal pain scale improves the understanding of oncology inpatient pain intensity

E. Au, Charles Lawrence Loprinzi, M. Dhodapkar, T. Nelson, P. Novotny, J. Hammack, J. O'Fallon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study was undertaken to determine if the daily use of a verbal pain scale could improve the correlation of pain perception between hospitalized oncology patients and their caregivers. Patients and Methods: Hospitalized oncology patients were asked to rate verbally their average pain over the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 to 10. The patients' primary-care physicians and nurses were asked the same question on the same morning after they had evaluated their patients. Results: During a baseline study, only 64% of caregivers' pain scores were within two points of the respective patient's score. Caregivers tended to underestimate patients' pain scores. Caregivers were alerted to these poor results and then requested to ask each patient daily for the average pain score and record this score on the patient's medical record. Nonetheless, correlation between patients' and caregivers' pain scores remained poor (68% within two points of each other) during a second study. The major reason for the poor results appeared to be because caregivers did not routinely ask patients for pain scores. Subsequently, a renewed, more intensive educational effort was undertaken and a third study was conducted. During the third study, 85% of caregivers' and patients' pain scores were within two points of each other (P = .001 when compared with baseline). Conclusion: The enforced use of a simple verbal pain assessment tool appears to improve caregiver's understanding of the pain status of hospitalized oncology patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2751-2755
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume12
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 1994

Fingerprint

Inpatients
Pain
Caregivers
Cancer Pain
Pain Perception
Primary Care Physicians
Pain Measurement
Medical Records
Patient Care
Nurses

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Au, E., Loprinzi, C. L., Dhodapkar, M., Nelson, T., Novotny, P., Hammack, J., & O'Fallon, J. (1994). Regular use of a verbal pain scale improves the understanding of oncology inpatient pain intensity. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 12(12), 2751-2755.

Regular use of a verbal pain scale improves the understanding of oncology inpatient pain intensity. / Au, E.; Loprinzi, Charles Lawrence; Dhodapkar, M.; Nelson, T.; Novotny, P.; Hammack, J.; O'Fallon, J.

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 12, No. 12, 12.1994, p. 2751-2755.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Au, E, Loprinzi, CL, Dhodapkar, M, Nelson, T, Novotny, P, Hammack, J & O'Fallon, J 1994, 'Regular use of a verbal pain scale improves the understanding of oncology inpatient pain intensity', Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 2751-2755.
Au, E. ; Loprinzi, Charles Lawrence ; Dhodapkar, M. ; Nelson, T. ; Novotny, P. ; Hammack, J. ; O'Fallon, J. / Regular use of a verbal pain scale improves the understanding of oncology inpatient pain intensity. In: Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1994 ; Vol. 12, No. 12. pp. 2751-2755.
@article{77621036fa8e4a5499800ec4026f2836,
title = "Regular use of a verbal pain scale improves the understanding of oncology inpatient pain intensity",
abstract = "Purpose: This study was undertaken to determine if the daily use of a verbal pain scale could improve the correlation of pain perception between hospitalized oncology patients and their caregivers. Patients and Methods: Hospitalized oncology patients were asked to rate verbally their average pain over the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 to 10. The patients' primary-care physicians and nurses were asked the same question on the same morning after they had evaluated their patients. Results: During a baseline study, only 64{\%} of caregivers' pain scores were within two points of the respective patient's score. Caregivers tended to underestimate patients' pain scores. Caregivers were alerted to these poor results and then requested to ask each patient daily for the average pain score and record this score on the patient's medical record. Nonetheless, correlation between patients' and caregivers' pain scores remained poor (68{\%} within two points of each other) during a second study. The major reason for the poor results appeared to be because caregivers did not routinely ask patients for pain scores. Subsequently, a renewed, more intensive educational effort was undertaken and a third study was conducted. During the third study, 85{\%} of caregivers' and patients' pain scores were within two points of each other (P = .001 when compared with baseline). Conclusion: The enforced use of a simple verbal pain assessment tool appears to improve caregiver's understanding of the pain status of hospitalized oncology patients.",
author = "E. Au and Loprinzi, {Charles Lawrence} and M. Dhodapkar and T. Nelson and P. Novotny and J. Hammack and J. O'Fallon",
year = "1994",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "2751--2755",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Oncology",
issn = "0732-183X",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Oncology",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regular use of a verbal pain scale improves the understanding of oncology inpatient pain intensity

AU - Au, E.

AU - Loprinzi, Charles Lawrence

AU - Dhodapkar, M.

AU - Nelson, T.

AU - Novotny, P.

AU - Hammack, J.

AU - O'Fallon, J.

PY - 1994/12

Y1 - 1994/12

N2 - Purpose: This study was undertaken to determine if the daily use of a verbal pain scale could improve the correlation of pain perception between hospitalized oncology patients and their caregivers. Patients and Methods: Hospitalized oncology patients were asked to rate verbally their average pain over the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 to 10. The patients' primary-care physicians and nurses were asked the same question on the same morning after they had evaluated their patients. Results: During a baseline study, only 64% of caregivers' pain scores were within two points of the respective patient's score. Caregivers tended to underestimate patients' pain scores. Caregivers were alerted to these poor results and then requested to ask each patient daily for the average pain score and record this score on the patient's medical record. Nonetheless, correlation between patients' and caregivers' pain scores remained poor (68% within two points of each other) during a second study. The major reason for the poor results appeared to be because caregivers did not routinely ask patients for pain scores. Subsequently, a renewed, more intensive educational effort was undertaken and a third study was conducted. During the third study, 85% of caregivers' and patients' pain scores were within two points of each other (P = .001 when compared with baseline). Conclusion: The enforced use of a simple verbal pain assessment tool appears to improve caregiver's understanding of the pain status of hospitalized oncology patients.

AB - Purpose: This study was undertaken to determine if the daily use of a verbal pain scale could improve the correlation of pain perception between hospitalized oncology patients and their caregivers. Patients and Methods: Hospitalized oncology patients were asked to rate verbally their average pain over the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 to 10. The patients' primary-care physicians and nurses were asked the same question on the same morning after they had evaluated their patients. Results: During a baseline study, only 64% of caregivers' pain scores were within two points of the respective patient's score. Caregivers tended to underestimate patients' pain scores. Caregivers were alerted to these poor results and then requested to ask each patient daily for the average pain score and record this score on the patient's medical record. Nonetheless, correlation between patients' and caregivers' pain scores remained poor (68% within two points of each other) during a second study. The major reason for the poor results appeared to be because caregivers did not routinely ask patients for pain scores. Subsequently, a renewed, more intensive educational effort was undertaken and a third study was conducted. During the third study, 85% of caregivers' and patients' pain scores were within two points of each other (P = .001 when compared with baseline). Conclusion: The enforced use of a simple verbal pain assessment tool appears to improve caregiver's understanding of the pain status of hospitalized oncology patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027943192&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027943192&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7989952

AN - SCOPUS:0027943192

VL - 12

SP - 2751

EP - 2755

JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology

JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology

SN - 0732-183X

IS - 12

ER -