TY - JOUR
T1 - Regorafenib for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Progressed After Standard Therapy
T2 - Results of the Large, Single-Arm, Open-Label Phase IIIb CONSIGN Study
AU - Van Cutsem, Eric
AU - Martinelli, Erika
AU - Cascinu, Stefano
AU - Sobrero, Alberto
AU - Banzi, Maria
AU - Seitz, Jean François
AU - Barone, Carlo
AU - Ychou, Marc
AU - Peeters, Marc
AU - Brenner, Baruch
AU - Hofheinz, Ralf Dieter
AU - Maiello, Evaristo
AU - André, Thierry
AU - Spallanzani, Andrea
AU - Garcia-Carbonero, Rocio
AU - Arriaga, Yull E.
AU - Verma, Udit
AU - Grothey, Axel
AU - Kappeler, Christian
AU - Miriyala, Ashok
AU - Kalmus, Joachim
AU - Falcone, Alfredo
AU - Zaniboni, Alberto
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was sponsored by Bayer. Bayer provided the study medication and collaborated with the authors to design the study. Bayer worked with the investigators on the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, and on the preparation of this report. The authors made the final decision to submit the article for publication. Editorial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript was provided by Ann Contijoch (Bayer) and Jennifer Tobin (SuccinctChoice Medical Communications, London, UK, with financial support from Bayer). The authors thank the patients who participated in the CONSIGN trial, their families, and the CONSIGN investigators. A list of the CONSIGN investigators can be found in supplemental online Table 7. Stefano Cascinu is currently affiliated with the Department of Oncology/Hematology, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. Rocio Garcia-Carbonero is currently affiliated with the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Uni-versitario Doce de Octubre, IIS imas 12, CNIO, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Funding Information:
This study was sponsored by Bayer. Bayer provided the study medication and collaborated with the authors to design the study. Bayer worked with the investigators on the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, and on the preparation of this report. The authors made the final decision to submit the article for publication. Editorial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript was provided by Ann Contijoch (Bayer) and Jennifer Tobin (SuccinctChoice Medical Communications, London, UK, with financial support from Bayer). The authors thank the patients who participated in the CONSIGN trial, their families, and the CONSIGN investigators. A list of the CONSIGN investigators can be found in supplemental online Table 7. Stefano Cascinu is currently affiliated with the Department of Oncology/Hematology, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. Rocio Garcia-Carbonero is currently affiliated with the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, IIS imas 12, CNIO, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Publisher Copyright:
© AlphaMed Press 2018
PY - 2019/2
Y1 - 2019/2
N2 - Background: In the phase III CORRECT trial, regorafenib significantly improved survival in treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The CONSIGN study was designed to further characterize regorafenib safety and allow patients access to regorafenib before market authorization. Methods: This prospective, single-arm study enrolled patients in 25 countries at 186 sites. Patients with treatment-refractory mCRC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≤1 received regorafenib 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. The primary endpoint was safety. Progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator assessment was the only efficacy evaluation. Results: In total, 2,872 patients were assigned to treatment and 2,864 were treated. Median age was 62 years, ECOG PS 0/1 was 47%/53%, and 74% had received at least three prior regimens for metastatic disease. Median treatment duration was three cycles. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) led to dose reduction in 46% of patients. Regorafenib-related TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 9%. Grade 5 regorafenib-related TEAEs occurred in <1%. The most common grade ≥3 regorafenib-related TEAEs were hypertension (15%), hand–foot skin reaction (14%), fatigue (13%), diarrhea (5%), and hypophosphatemia (5%). Treatment-emergent grade 3–4 laboratory toxicities included alanine aminotransferase (6%), aspartate aminotransferase (7%), and bilirubin (13%). Ongoing monitoring identified one nonfatal case of regorafenib-related severe drug-induced liver injury per DILI Working Group criteria. Median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 2.7 months (2.6–2.7). Conclusion: In CONSIGN, the frequency and severity of TEAEs were consistent with the known safety profile of regorafenib. PFS was similar to reports of phase III trials. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01538680. Implications for Practice: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who fail treatment with standard therapies, including chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies targeting vascular endothelial growth factor or epidermal growth factor receptor, have few treatment options. The multikinase inhibitor regorafenib was shown to improve survival in patients with treatment-refractory mCRC in the phase III CORRECT (N = 760) and CONCUR (N = 204) trials. However, safety data on regorafenib for mCRC in a larger number of patients were not available. The CONSIGN trial, carried out prospectively in more than 2,800 patients across 25 countries, confirmed the safety profile of regorafenib from the phase III trials and reinforced the importance of using treatment modifications to manage adverse events.
AB - Background: In the phase III CORRECT trial, regorafenib significantly improved survival in treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The CONSIGN study was designed to further characterize regorafenib safety and allow patients access to regorafenib before market authorization. Methods: This prospective, single-arm study enrolled patients in 25 countries at 186 sites. Patients with treatment-refractory mCRC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≤1 received regorafenib 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. The primary endpoint was safety. Progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator assessment was the only efficacy evaluation. Results: In total, 2,872 patients were assigned to treatment and 2,864 were treated. Median age was 62 years, ECOG PS 0/1 was 47%/53%, and 74% had received at least three prior regimens for metastatic disease. Median treatment duration was three cycles. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) led to dose reduction in 46% of patients. Regorafenib-related TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 9%. Grade 5 regorafenib-related TEAEs occurred in <1%. The most common grade ≥3 regorafenib-related TEAEs were hypertension (15%), hand–foot skin reaction (14%), fatigue (13%), diarrhea (5%), and hypophosphatemia (5%). Treatment-emergent grade 3–4 laboratory toxicities included alanine aminotransferase (6%), aspartate aminotransferase (7%), and bilirubin (13%). Ongoing monitoring identified one nonfatal case of regorafenib-related severe drug-induced liver injury per DILI Working Group criteria. Median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 2.7 months (2.6–2.7). Conclusion: In CONSIGN, the frequency and severity of TEAEs were consistent with the known safety profile of regorafenib. PFS was similar to reports of phase III trials. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01538680. Implications for Practice: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who fail treatment with standard therapies, including chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies targeting vascular endothelial growth factor or epidermal growth factor receptor, have few treatment options. The multikinase inhibitor regorafenib was shown to improve survival in patients with treatment-refractory mCRC in the phase III CORRECT (N = 760) and CONCUR (N = 204) trials. However, safety data on regorafenib for mCRC in a larger number of patients were not available. The CONSIGN trial, carried out prospectively in more than 2,800 patients across 25 countries, confirmed the safety profile of regorafenib from the phase III trials and reinforced the importance of using treatment modifications to manage adverse events.
KW - Metastatic colorectal cancer
KW - Prospective studies
KW - Regorafenib
KW - Toxicities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053261010&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053261010&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0072
DO - 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0072
M3 - Article
C2 - 30190299
AN - SCOPUS:85053261010
SN - 1083-7159
VL - 24
SP - 185
EP - 192
JO - Oncologist
JF - Oncologist
IS - 2
ER -