Regional variations in peer reviewed liver allocation under the MELD system

Hector Rodriguez-Luna, Hugo E Vargas, Adyr Moss, Kunam Sudhakar Reddy, Richard B. Freeman, David Mulligan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) is used to assign priority for liver transplantation candidates. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) approved recognized exceptional diagnoses (RED's) for which MELD fails to accurately measure priority. Centers can request increased MELD points in cases not recognized by this policy (non-RED's). Our aim was to compare regional practices to justify non-RED requests for MELD adjustments. The UNOS/OPTN database was queried to extract all adult cases for which a non-RED MELD adjustment was requested from 2/27/02 until 8/27/03. The data were stratified by region and justification. Data for 29510 listings were available. 26947 had complete diagnosis information. There were 827 non-RED requests of which 477 (57.7%) petitions were approved by the regional review boards (RRBs). The approval rate varied significantly among regions (range: 28-75%, p < 0.0001). The most common non-RED's were complications of portal hypertension (48%). The percentage of patients listed with non-RED's varied significantly among regions (0.7-8.3%, p < 0.0001), as did the proportion of patients transplanted with non-RED's (2.1-31.9%, p < 0.0001). Demographics did not differ among regions requesting non-REDs. Widespread regional variations exist in the handling of requests for non-REDs. These variations point to the need for reform to standard exception criteria.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2244-2247
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Transplantation
Volume5
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2005

Fingerprint

End Stage Liver Disease
Liver
Tissue and Organ Procurement
Organ Transplantation
Portal Hypertension
Liver Transplantation
Demography
Databases

Keywords

  • Allocation
  • Liver transplantation
  • MELD

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology

Cite this

Regional variations in peer reviewed liver allocation under the MELD system. / Rodriguez-Luna, Hector; Vargas, Hugo E; Moss, Adyr; Reddy, Kunam Sudhakar; Freeman, Richard B.; Mulligan, David.

In: American Journal of Transplantation, Vol. 5, No. 9, 09.2005, p. 2244-2247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rodriguez-Luna, Hector ; Vargas, Hugo E ; Moss, Adyr ; Reddy, Kunam Sudhakar ; Freeman, Richard B. ; Mulligan, David. / Regional variations in peer reviewed liver allocation under the MELD system. In: American Journal of Transplantation. 2005 ; Vol. 5, No. 9. pp. 2244-2247.
@article{5976258280844aeb876ad77ab9173f0d,
title = "Regional variations in peer reviewed liver allocation under the MELD system",
abstract = "The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) is used to assign priority for liver transplantation candidates. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) approved recognized exceptional diagnoses (RED's) for which MELD fails to accurately measure priority. Centers can request increased MELD points in cases not recognized by this policy (non-RED's). Our aim was to compare regional practices to justify non-RED requests for MELD adjustments. The UNOS/OPTN database was queried to extract all adult cases for which a non-RED MELD adjustment was requested from 2/27/02 until 8/27/03. The data were stratified by region and justification. Data for 29510 listings were available. 26947 had complete diagnosis information. There were 827 non-RED requests of which 477 (57.7{\%}) petitions were approved by the regional review boards (RRBs). The approval rate varied significantly among regions (range: 28-75{\%}, p < 0.0001). The most common non-RED's were complications of portal hypertension (48{\%}). The percentage of patients listed with non-RED's varied significantly among regions (0.7-8.3{\%}, p < 0.0001), as did the proportion of patients transplanted with non-RED's (2.1-31.9{\%}, p < 0.0001). Demographics did not differ among regions requesting non-REDs. Widespread regional variations exist in the handling of requests for non-REDs. These variations point to the need for reform to standard exception criteria.",
keywords = "Allocation, Liver transplantation, MELD",
author = "Hector Rodriguez-Luna and Vargas, {Hugo E} and Adyr Moss and Reddy, {Kunam Sudhakar} and Freeman, {Richard B.} and David Mulligan",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01008.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "2244--2247",
journal = "American Journal of Transplantation",
issn = "1600-6135",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regional variations in peer reviewed liver allocation under the MELD system

AU - Rodriguez-Luna, Hector

AU - Vargas, Hugo E

AU - Moss, Adyr

AU - Reddy, Kunam Sudhakar

AU - Freeman, Richard B.

AU - Mulligan, David

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) is used to assign priority for liver transplantation candidates. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) approved recognized exceptional diagnoses (RED's) for which MELD fails to accurately measure priority. Centers can request increased MELD points in cases not recognized by this policy (non-RED's). Our aim was to compare regional practices to justify non-RED requests for MELD adjustments. The UNOS/OPTN database was queried to extract all adult cases for which a non-RED MELD adjustment was requested from 2/27/02 until 8/27/03. The data were stratified by region and justification. Data for 29510 listings were available. 26947 had complete diagnosis information. There were 827 non-RED requests of which 477 (57.7%) petitions were approved by the regional review boards (RRBs). The approval rate varied significantly among regions (range: 28-75%, p < 0.0001). The most common non-RED's were complications of portal hypertension (48%). The percentage of patients listed with non-RED's varied significantly among regions (0.7-8.3%, p < 0.0001), as did the proportion of patients transplanted with non-RED's (2.1-31.9%, p < 0.0001). Demographics did not differ among regions requesting non-REDs. Widespread regional variations exist in the handling of requests for non-REDs. These variations point to the need for reform to standard exception criteria.

AB - The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) is used to assign priority for liver transplantation candidates. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) approved recognized exceptional diagnoses (RED's) for which MELD fails to accurately measure priority. Centers can request increased MELD points in cases not recognized by this policy (non-RED's). Our aim was to compare regional practices to justify non-RED requests for MELD adjustments. The UNOS/OPTN database was queried to extract all adult cases for which a non-RED MELD adjustment was requested from 2/27/02 until 8/27/03. The data were stratified by region and justification. Data for 29510 listings were available. 26947 had complete diagnosis information. There were 827 non-RED requests of which 477 (57.7%) petitions were approved by the regional review boards (RRBs). The approval rate varied significantly among regions (range: 28-75%, p < 0.0001). The most common non-RED's were complications of portal hypertension (48%). The percentage of patients listed with non-RED's varied significantly among regions (0.7-8.3%, p < 0.0001), as did the proportion of patients transplanted with non-RED's (2.1-31.9%, p < 0.0001). Demographics did not differ among regions requesting non-REDs. Widespread regional variations exist in the handling of requests for non-REDs. These variations point to the need for reform to standard exception criteria.

KW - Allocation

KW - Liver transplantation

KW - MELD

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27844478291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27844478291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01008.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01008.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 16095504

AN - SCOPUS:27844478291

VL - 5

SP - 2244

EP - 2247

JO - American Journal of Transplantation

JF - American Journal of Transplantation

SN - 1600-6135

IS - 9

ER -