Reconstruction of the segmental mandibular defect: Current state of the art

Richard E Hayden, David P. Mullin, Andrew K. Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article reviews literature pertaining to advances in the reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects in the context of an established standard of care, microvascular transfer of free osteocutaneous flaps. RECENT FINDINGS: Most literature reiterates established reconstructive techniques. Exceptions include the use of computer-assisted modeling to preoperatively design the excision of both the mandible and fibula segments and to produce a template for contouring the neomandible, the design of new flaps, distraction osteogenesis and techniques for dealing with osteonecrosis. SUMMARY: The microvascular transfer of free osteocutaneous flaps remains the standard of care, with the fibula flap the clear favorite. Review of the evolution of this flap for segmental mandibular reconstruction provides the bulk of the literature. Improvement on this standard of practice continues to be elusive, in large part because of the effects of associated radiation. Tissue engineering holds promise but no current practical application is available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)231-236
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2012

Fingerprint

Mandibular Reconstruction
Fibula
Free Tissue Flaps
Standard of Care
Distraction Osteogenesis
Osteonecrosis
Radiation Effects
Tissue Engineering
Mandible

Keywords

  • computer-generated modeling
  • free flaps
  • mandible reconstruction
  • osteonecrosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Reconstruction of the segmental mandibular defect : Current state of the art. / Hayden, Richard E; Mullin, David P.; Patel, Andrew K.

In: Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 20, No. 4, 08.2012, p. 231-236.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{7e4ef4bc59474f87a179b550a3e4dcd2,
title = "Reconstruction of the segmental mandibular defect: Current state of the art",
abstract = "PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article reviews literature pertaining to advances in the reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects in the context of an established standard of care, microvascular transfer of free osteocutaneous flaps. RECENT FINDINGS: Most literature reiterates established reconstructive techniques. Exceptions include the use of computer-assisted modeling to preoperatively design the excision of both the mandible and fibula segments and to produce a template for contouring the neomandible, the design of new flaps, distraction osteogenesis and techniques for dealing with osteonecrosis. SUMMARY: The microvascular transfer of free osteocutaneous flaps remains the standard of care, with the fibula flap the clear favorite. Review of the evolution of this flap for segmental mandibular reconstruction provides the bulk of the literature. Improvement on this standard of practice continues to be elusive, in large part because of the effects of associated radiation. Tissue engineering holds promise but no current practical application is available.",
keywords = "computer-generated modeling, free flaps, mandible reconstruction, osteonecrosis",
author = "Hayden, {Richard E} and Mullin, {David P.} and Patel, {Andrew K.}",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1097/MOO.0b013e328355d0f3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "231--236",
journal = "Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery",
issn = "1068-9508",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconstruction of the segmental mandibular defect

T2 - Current state of the art

AU - Hayden, Richard E

AU - Mullin, David P.

AU - Patel, Andrew K.

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article reviews literature pertaining to advances in the reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects in the context of an established standard of care, microvascular transfer of free osteocutaneous flaps. RECENT FINDINGS: Most literature reiterates established reconstructive techniques. Exceptions include the use of computer-assisted modeling to preoperatively design the excision of both the mandible and fibula segments and to produce a template for contouring the neomandible, the design of new flaps, distraction osteogenesis and techniques for dealing with osteonecrosis. SUMMARY: The microvascular transfer of free osteocutaneous flaps remains the standard of care, with the fibula flap the clear favorite. Review of the evolution of this flap for segmental mandibular reconstruction provides the bulk of the literature. Improvement on this standard of practice continues to be elusive, in large part because of the effects of associated radiation. Tissue engineering holds promise but no current practical application is available.

AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article reviews literature pertaining to advances in the reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects in the context of an established standard of care, microvascular transfer of free osteocutaneous flaps. RECENT FINDINGS: Most literature reiterates established reconstructive techniques. Exceptions include the use of computer-assisted modeling to preoperatively design the excision of both the mandible and fibula segments and to produce a template for contouring the neomandible, the design of new flaps, distraction osteogenesis and techniques for dealing with osteonecrosis. SUMMARY: The microvascular transfer of free osteocutaneous flaps remains the standard of care, with the fibula flap the clear favorite. Review of the evolution of this flap for segmental mandibular reconstruction provides the bulk of the literature. Improvement on this standard of practice continues to be elusive, in large part because of the effects of associated radiation. Tissue engineering holds promise but no current practical application is available.

KW - computer-generated modeling

KW - free flaps

KW - mandible reconstruction

KW - osteonecrosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863839133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863839133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MOO.0b013e328355d0f3

DO - 10.1097/MOO.0b013e328355d0f3

M3 - Review article

C2 - 22894990

AN - SCOPUS:84863839133

VL - 20

SP - 231

EP - 236

JO - Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery

JF - Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery

SN - 1068-9508

IS - 4

ER -