Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam principles)

Christopher R. Kinsinger, James Apffel, Mark Baker, Xiaopeng Bian, Christoph H. Borchers, Ralph Bradshaw, Mi Youn Brusniak, Daniel W. Chan, Eric W. Deutsch, Bruno Domon, Jeff Gorman, Rudolf Grimm, William Hancock, Henning Hermjakob, David Horn, Christie Hunter, Patrik Kolar, Hans Joachim Kraus, Hanno Langen, Rune LindingRobert L. Moritz, Gilbert S. Omenn, Ron Orlando, Akhilesh Pandey, Peipei Ping, Amir Rahbar, Robert Rivers, Sean L. Seymour, Richard J. Simpson, Douglas Slotta, Richard D. Smith, Stephen E. Stein, David L. Tabb, Danilo Tagle, John R. Yates, Henry Rodriguez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Policies supporting the rapid and open sharing of proteomic data are being implemented by the leading journals in the field. The proteomics community is taking steps to ensure that data are made publicly accessible and are of high quality, a challenging task that requires the development and deployment of methods for measuring and documenting data quality metrics. On September 18, 2010, the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) convened the "International Workshop on Proteomic Data Quality Metrics" in Sydney, Australia, to identify and address issues facing the development and use of such methods for open access proteomics data. The stakeholders at the workshop enumerated the key principles underlying a framework for data quality assessment in mass spectrometry data that will meet the needs of the research community, journals, funding agencies, and data repositories. Attendees discussed and agreed up on two primary needs for the wide use of quality metrics: (i) an evolving list of comprehensive quality metrics and (ii) standards accompanied by software analytics. Attendees stressed the importance of increased education and training programs to promote reliable protocols in proteomics. This workshop report explores the historic precedents, key discussions, and necessary next steps to enhance the quality of open access data. By agreement, this article is published simultaneously in Proteomics, Proteomics Clinical Applications, Journal of Proteome Research, and Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, as a public service to the research community. The peer review process was a coordinated effort conducted by a panel of referees selected by the journals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)580-589
Number of pages10
JournalProteomics - Clinical Applications
Volume5
Issue number11-12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Proteomics
Mass spectrometry
Mass Spectrometry
Education
Research
Peer Review
National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
Data Accuracy
Information Dissemination
Proteome
Software

Keywords

  • Amsterdam principles
  • Bioinformatics
  • Data quality
  • Metrics
  • Open access
  • Selected reaction monitoring
  • Standards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Biochemistry

Cite this

Kinsinger, C. R., Apffel, J., Baker, M., Bian, X., Borchers, C. H., Bradshaw, R., ... Rodriguez, H. (2011). Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam principles). Proteomics - Clinical Applications, 5(11-12), 580-589. https://doi.org/10.1002/prca.201100097

Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam principles). / Kinsinger, Christopher R.; Apffel, James; Baker, Mark; Bian, Xiaopeng; Borchers, Christoph H.; Bradshaw, Ralph; Brusniak, Mi Youn; Chan, Daniel W.; Deutsch, Eric W.; Domon, Bruno; Gorman, Jeff; Grimm, Rudolf; Hancock, William; Hermjakob, Henning; Horn, David; Hunter, Christie; Kolar, Patrik; Kraus, Hans Joachim; Langen, Hanno; Linding, Rune; Moritz, Robert L.; Omenn, Gilbert S.; Orlando, Ron; Pandey, Akhilesh; Ping, Peipei; Rahbar, Amir; Rivers, Robert; Seymour, Sean L.; Simpson, Richard J.; Slotta, Douglas; Smith, Richard D.; Stein, Stephen E.; Tabb, David L.; Tagle, Danilo; Yates, John R.; Rodriguez, Henry.

In: Proteomics - Clinical Applications, Vol. 5, No. 11-12, 01.12.2011, p. 580-589.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kinsinger, CR, Apffel, J, Baker, M, Bian, X, Borchers, CH, Bradshaw, R, Brusniak, MY, Chan, DW, Deutsch, EW, Domon, B, Gorman, J, Grimm, R, Hancock, W, Hermjakob, H, Horn, D, Hunter, C, Kolar, P, Kraus, HJ, Langen, H, Linding, R, Moritz, RL, Omenn, GS, Orlando, R, Pandey, A, Ping, P, Rahbar, A, Rivers, R, Seymour, SL, Simpson, RJ, Slotta, D, Smith, RD, Stein, SE, Tabb, DL, Tagle, D, Yates, JR & Rodriguez, H 2011, 'Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam principles)', Proteomics - Clinical Applications, vol. 5, no. 11-12, pp. 580-589. https://doi.org/10.1002/prca.201100097
Kinsinger, Christopher R. ; Apffel, James ; Baker, Mark ; Bian, Xiaopeng ; Borchers, Christoph H. ; Bradshaw, Ralph ; Brusniak, Mi Youn ; Chan, Daniel W. ; Deutsch, Eric W. ; Domon, Bruno ; Gorman, Jeff ; Grimm, Rudolf ; Hancock, William ; Hermjakob, Henning ; Horn, David ; Hunter, Christie ; Kolar, Patrik ; Kraus, Hans Joachim ; Langen, Hanno ; Linding, Rune ; Moritz, Robert L. ; Omenn, Gilbert S. ; Orlando, Ron ; Pandey, Akhilesh ; Ping, Peipei ; Rahbar, Amir ; Rivers, Robert ; Seymour, Sean L. ; Simpson, Richard J. ; Slotta, Douglas ; Smith, Richard D. ; Stein, Stephen E. ; Tabb, David L. ; Tagle, Danilo ; Yates, John R. ; Rodriguez, Henry. / Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam principles). In: Proteomics - Clinical Applications. 2011 ; Vol. 5, No. 11-12. pp. 580-589.
@article{3cf9cf67cd5b4ee5929d42790ac2f35e,
title = "Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam principles)",
abstract = "Policies supporting the rapid and open sharing of proteomic data are being implemented by the leading journals in the field. The proteomics community is taking steps to ensure that data are made publicly accessible and are of high quality, a challenging task that requires the development and deployment of methods for measuring and documenting data quality metrics. On September 18, 2010, the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) convened the {"}International Workshop on Proteomic Data Quality Metrics{"} in Sydney, Australia, to identify and address issues facing the development and use of such methods for open access proteomics data. The stakeholders at the workshop enumerated the key principles underlying a framework for data quality assessment in mass spectrometry data that will meet the needs of the research community, journals, funding agencies, and data repositories. Attendees discussed and agreed up on two primary needs for the wide use of quality metrics: (i) an evolving list of comprehensive quality metrics and (ii) standards accompanied by software analytics. Attendees stressed the importance of increased education and training programs to promote reliable protocols in proteomics. This workshop report explores the historic precedents, key discussions, and necessary next steps to enhance the quality of open access data. By agreement, this article is published simultaneously in Proteomics, Proteomics Clinical Applications, Journal of Proteome Research, and Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, as a public service to the research community. The peer review process was a coordinated effort conducted by a panel of referees selected by the journals.",
keywords = "Amsterdam principles, Bioinformatics, Data quality, Metrics, Open access, Selected reaction monitoring, Standards",
author = "Kinsinger, {Christopher R.} and James Apffel and Mark Baker and Xiaopeng Bian and Borchers, {Christoph H.} and Ralph Bradshaw and Brusniak, {Mi Youn} and Chan, {Daniel W.} and Deutsch, {Eric W.} and Bruno Domon and Jeff Gorman and Rudolf Grimm and William Hancock and Henning Hermjakob and David Horn and Christie Hunter and Patrik Kolar and Kraus, {Hans Joachim} and Hanno Langen and Rune Linding and Moritz, {Robert L.} and Omenn, {Gilbert S.} and Ron Orlando and Akhilesh Pandey and Peipei Ping and Amir Rahbar and Robert Rivers and Seymour, {Sean L.} and Simpson, {Richard J.} and Douglas Slotta and Smith, {Richard D.} and Stein, {Stephen E.} and Tabb, {David L.} and Danilo Tagle and Yates, {John R.} and Henry Rodriguez",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/prca.201100097",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "580--589",
journal = "Proteomics - Clinical Applications",
issn = "1862-8346",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "11-12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam principles)

AU - Kinsinger, Christopher R.

AU - Apffel, James

AU - Baker, Mark

AU - Bian, Xiaopeng

AU - Borchers, Christoph H.

AU - Bradshaw, Ralph

AU - Brusniak, Mi Youn

AU - Chan, Daniel W.

AU - Deutsch, Eric W.

AU - Domon, Bruno

AU - Gorman, Jeff

AU - Grimm, Rudolf

AU - Hancock, William

AU - Hermjakob, Henning

AU - Horn, David

AU - Hunter, Christie

AU - Kolar, Patrik

AU - Kraus, Hans Joachim

AU - Langen, Hanno

AU - Linding, Rune

AU - Moritz, Robert L.

AU - Omenn, Gilbert S.

AU - Orlando, Ron

AU - Pandey, Akhilesh

AU - Ping, Peipei

AU - Rahbar, Amir

AU - Rivers, Robert

AU - Seymour, Sean L.

AU - Simpson, Richard J.

AU - Slotta, Douglas

AU - Smith, Richard D.

AU - Stein, Stephen E.

AU - Tabb, David L.

AU - Tagle, Danilo

AU - Yates, John R.

AU - Rodriguez, Henry

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Policies supporting the rapid and open sharing of proteomic data are being implemented by the leading journals in the field. The proteomics community is taking steps to ensure that data are made publicly accessible and are of high quality, a challenging task that requires the development and deployment of methods for measuring and documenting data quality metrics. On September 18, 2010, the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) convened the "International Workshop on Proteomic Data Quality Metrics" in Sydney, Australia, to identify and address issues facing the development and use of such methods for open access proteomics data. The stakeholders at the workshop enumerated the key principles underlying a framework for data quality assessment in mass spectrometry data that will meet the needs of the research community, journals, funding agencies, and data repositories. Attendees discussed and agreed up on two primary needs for the wide use of quality metrics: (i) an evolving list of comprehensive quality metrics and (ii) standards accompanied by software analytics. Attendees stressed the importance of increased education and training programs to promote reliable protocols in proteomics. This workshop report explores the historic precedents, key discussions, and necessary next steps to enhance the quality of open access data. By agreement, this article is published simultaneously in Proteomics, Proteomics Clinical Applications, Journal of Proteome Research, and Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, as a public service to the research community. The peer review process was a coordinated effort conducted by a panel of referees selected by the journals.

AB - Policies supporting the rapid and open sharing of proteomic data are being implemented by the leading journals in the field. The proteomics community is taking steps to ensure that data are made publicly accessible and are of high quality, a challenging task that requires the development and deployment of methods for measuring and documenting data quality metrics. On September 18, 2010, the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) convened the "International Workshop on Proteomic Data Quality Metrics" in Sydney, Australia, to identify and address issues facing the development and use of such methods for open access proteomics data. The stakeholders at the workshop enumerated the key principles underlying a framework for data quality assessment in mass spectrometry data that will meet the needs of the research community, journals, funding agencies, and data repositories. Attendees discussed and agreed up on two primary needs for the wide use of quality metrics: (i) an evolving list of comprehensive quality metrics and (ii) standards accompanied by software analytics. Attendees stressed the importance of increased education and training programs to promote reliable protocols in proteomics. This workshop report explores the historic precedents, key discussions, and necessary next steps to enhance the quality of open access data. By agreement, this article is published simultaneously in Proteomics, Proteomics Clinical Applications, Journal of Proteome Research, and Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, as a public service to the research community. The peer review process was a coordinated effort conducted by a panel of referees selected by the journals.

KW - Amsterdam principles

KW - Bioinformatics

KW - Data quality

KW - Metrics

KW - Open access

KW - Selected reaction monitoring

KW - Standards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855171902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855171902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/prca.201100097

DO - 10.1002/prca.201100097

M3 - Article

C2 - 22213554

AN - SCOPUS:84855171902

VL - 5

SP - 580

EP - 589

JO - Proteomics - Clinical Applications

JF - Proteomics - Clinical Applications

SN - 1862-8346

IS - 11-12

ER -