Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology

Ethan Basch, Amy P. Abernethy, C. Daniel Mullins, Bryce B. Reeve, Mary Lou Smith, Stephen Joel Coons, Jeff Sloan, Keith Wenzel, Cynthia Chauhan, Wayland Eppard, Elizabeth S. Frank, Joseph Lipscomb, Stephen A. Raymond, Merianne Spencer, Sean Tunis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

257 Scopus citations

Abstract

Examining the patient's subjective experience in prospective clinical comparative effectiveness research (CER) of oncology treatments or process interventions is essential for informing decision making. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are the standard tools for directly eliciting the patient experience. There are currently no widely accepted standards for developing or implementing PRO measures in CER. Recommendations for the design and implementation of PRO measures in CER were developed via a standardized process including multistakeholder interviews, a technical working group, and public comments. Key recommendations are to include assessment of patient-reported symptoms as well as health-related quality of life in all prospective clinical CER studies in adult oncology; to identify symptoms relevant to a particular study population and context based on literature review and/or qualitative and quantitative methods; to assure that PRO measures used are valid, reliable, and sensitive in a comparable population (measures particularly recommended include EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT, MDASI, PRO-CTCAE, and PROMIS); to collect PRO data electronically whenever possible; to employ methods that minimize missing patient reports and include a plan for analyzing and reporting missing PRO data; to report the proportion of responders and cumulative distribution of responses in addition to mean changes in scores; and to publish results of PRO analyses simultaneously with other clinical outcomes. Twelve core symptoms are recommended for consideration in studies in advanced or metastatic cancers. Adherence to methodologic standards for the selection, implementation, and analysis/reporting of PRO measures will lead to an understanding of the patient experience that informs better decisions by patients, providers, regulators, and payers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4249-4255
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume30
Issue number34
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Basch, E., Abernethy, A. P., Mullins, C. D., Reeve, B. B., Smith, M. L., Coons, S. J., Sloan, J., Wenzel, K., Chauhan, C., Eppard, W., Frank, E. S., Lipscomb, J., Raymond, S. A., Spencer, M., & Tunis, S. (2012). Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(34), 4249-4255. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.42.5967