Rationale for, and recent progress in, 3D reconstruction of the heart and lungs

Erik L. Ritman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three-dimensional information of the structure and function of the heart and lungs is needed for several reasons including the following: (a) An apparent change in shape or location of the imaged ventricular wall may either be due to the heart moving through the imaged region, or because it truly represents that change in geometry, or a mixture of the two. In addition, as diseases of the heart and lungs are often heterogeneous in their spatial distribution, we expect the structural and functional consequences to also be heterogeneous in their spatial distribution; (b) Comparison of a selected anatomic feature (e.g., a coronary artery stenosis or pulmonary opacity) at long time intervals may make detection and/or quantitation of lesion progression questionable. The use of a 3D reconstruction to calculate a projection image with a reproducible angle of view is a particularly powerful consequence of 3D image reconstruction; (c) Use of image information from one imaging modality helps improve the quantitative characteristics of an image generated with another imaging modality; (d) Radiation treatment planning requires knowledge of the 3D distribution of radiation attenuation coefficients so that 3D distribution of the regional deposition of radiation energy can be quantitated, (e) Allows for indirect estimation of the physiological dimensions of one aspect of an organ so that the degree of disease of that part of the organ can be assessed. This can be achieved by imaging contiguous and/or organs dependant on the structure of immediate interest; and (f) For heart or lung transplant the shape and volume of the anatomic space available for the new organ should be known to prevent the problem of compressing the organ or the adjacent tissues after placement of the organ.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-271
Number of pages9
JournalComputerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
Volume17
Issue number4-5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Radiation
Lung
Imaging techniques
Spatial distribution
Computer-Assisted Image Processing
Coronary Stenosis
Transplants
Lung Diseases
Heart Diseases
Opacity
Image reconstruction
Tissue
Planning
Geometry

Keywords

  • Functional heterogeneity
  • Image registration
  • Interpolation
  • Partial volume effects
  • Radiation treatment planning
  • Tomography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Rationale for, and recent progress in, 3D reconstruction of the heart and lungs. / Ritman, Erik L.

In: Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, Vol. 17, No. 4-5, 1993, p. 263-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6b8a985b35324198af4115566c68d30c,
title = "Rationale for, and recent progress in, 3D reconstruction of the heart and lungs",
abstract = "Three-dimensional information of the structure and function of the heart and lungs is needed for several reasons including the following: (a) An apparent change in shape or location of the imaged ventricular wall may either be due to the heart moving through the imaged region, or because it truly represents that change in geometry, or a mixture of the two. In addition, as diseases of the heart and lungs are often heterogeneous in their spatial distribution, we expect the structural and functional consequences to also be heterogeneous in their spatial distribution; (b) Comparison of a selected anatomic feature (e.g., a coronary artery stenosis or pulmonary opacity) at long time intervals may make detection and/or quantitation of lesion progression questionable. The use of a 3D reconstruction to calculate a projection image with a reproducible angle of view is a particularly powerful consequence of 3D image reconstruction; (c) Use of image information from one imaging modality helps improve the quantitative characteristics of an image generated with another imaging modality; (d) Radiation treatment planning requires knowledge of the 3D distribution of radiation attenuation coefficients so that 3D distribution of the regional deposition of radiation energy can be quantitated, (e) Allows for indirect estimation of the physiological dimensions of one aspect of an organ so that the degree of disease of that part of the organ can be assessed. This can be achieved by imaging contiguous and/or organs dependant on the structure of immediate interest; and (f) For heart or lung transplant the shape and volume of the anatomic space available for the new organ should be known to prevent the problem of compressing the organ or the adjacent tissues after placement of the organ.",
keywords = "Functional heterogeneity, Image registration, Interpolation, Partial volume effects, Radiation treatment planning, Tomography",
author = "Ritman, {Erik L.}",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1016/0895-6111(93)90016-G",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "263--271",
journal = "Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics",
issn = "0895-6111",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4-5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rationale for, and recent progress in, 3D reconstruction of the heart and lungs

AU - Ritman, Erik L.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Three-dimensional information of the structure and function of the heart and lungs is needed for several reasons including the following: (a) An apparent change in shape or location of the imaged ventricular wall may either be due to the heart moving through the imaged region, or because it truly represents that change in geometry, or a mixture of the two. In addition, as diseases of the heart and lungs are often heterogeneous in their spatial distribution, we expect the structural and functional consequences to also be heterogeneous in their spatial distribution; (b) Comparison of a selected anatomic feature (e.g., a coronary artery stenosis or pulmonary opacity) at long time intervals may make detection and/or quantitation of lesion progression questionable. The use of a 3D reconstruction to calculate a projection image with a reproducible angle of view is a particularly powerful consequence of 3D image reconstruction; (c) Use of image information from one imaging modality helps improve the quantitative characteristics of an image generated with another imaging modality; (d) Radiation treatment planning requires knowledge of the 3D distribution of radiation attenuation coefficients so that 3D distribution of the regional deposition of radiation energy can be quantitated, (e) Allows for indirect estimation of the physiological dimensions of one aspect of an organ so that the degree of disease of that part of the organ can be assessed. This can be achieved by imaging contiguous and/or organs dependant on the structure of immediate interest; and (f) For heart or lung transplant the shape and volume of the anatomic space available for the new organ should be known to prevent the problem of compressing the organ or the adjacent tissues after placement of the organ.

AB - Three-dimensional information of the structure and function of the heart and lungs is needed for several reasons including the following: (a) An apparent change in shape or location of the imaged ventricular wall may either be due to the heart moving through the imaged region, or because it truly represents that change in geometry, or a mixture of the two. In addition, as diseases of the heart and lungs are often heterogeneous in their spatial distribution, we expect the structural and functional consequences to also be heterogeneous in their spatial distribution; (b) Comparison of a selected anatomic feature (e.g., a coronary artery stenosis or pulmonary opacity) at long time intervals may make detection and/or quantitation of lesion progression questionable. The use of a 3D reconstruction to calculate a projection image with a reproducible angle of view is a particularly powerful consequence of 3D image reconstruction; (c) Use of image information from one imaging modality helps improve the quantitative characteristics of an image generated with another imaging modality; (d) Radiation treatment planning requires knowledge of the 3D distribution of radiation attenuation coefficients so that 3D distribution of the regional deposition of radiation energy can be quantitated, (e) Allows for indirect estimation of the physiological dimensions of one aspect of an organ so that the degree of disease of that part of the organ can be assessed. This can be achieved by imaging contiguous and/or organs dependant on the structure of immediate interest; and (f) For heart or lung transplant the shape and volume of the anatomic space available for the new organ should be known to prevent the problem of compressing the organ or the adjacent tissues after placement of the organ.

KW - Functional heterogeneity

KW - Image registration

KW - Interpolation

KW - Partial volume effects

KW - Radiation treatment planning

KW - Tomography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027638123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027638123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0895-6111(93)90016-G

DO - 10.1016/0895-6111(93)90016-G

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 263

EP - 271

JO - Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics

JF - Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics

SN - 0895-6111

IS - 4-5

ER -