Randomized trial on the physiologic impact of NOTES

Juliane Bingener, Erica A. Loomis, Marianne Huebner, Christopher J. Gostout

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Our previous work revealed significantly less acidosis in swine undergoing natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using endoscopic air insufflation than swine undergoing standard laparoscopy. We wanted to evaluate the differential effects of CO2 versus intra-abdominal pressure as source for this finding. In addition, we investigated the endocrine stress response between swine undergoing NOTES peritoneoscopy with CO2 insufflation and animals undergoing standard diagnostic laparoscopy with CO2. Materials and methods: Twenty-eight (28) female 50-kg domestic pigs were randomly assigned to one of four groups using a permuted block randomization table: Group 1: NOTES using CO2 insufflation, Group 2: NOTES using air insufflation, Group 3: laparoscopy max pressure 12 mmHg and Group 4: laparoscopy with max pressure 7 mmHg. Invasive monitoring lines were placed. Pneumoperitoneum was established by the respective method and maintained for 90 min, visualizing liver, spleen and colon. Arterial blood gas was obtained at baseline and four additional time points. Serum TNF-α for POD (postoperative day) 1 and cumulative urine adrenaline for the procedure were determined by ELISA. ANOVA and t test were used for statistical comparison. The study was Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees approved. Results: All experiments were completed as outlined. Blood pH showed a significant difference between groups. Serum TNF-α revealed higher levels for NOTES CO2 on POD 1 than standard laparoscopy (p = 0.03). Conclusion: NOTES animals with CO2 insufflation initially experienced similar pH compared to standard laparoscopy but recovered to levels seen in low-pressure laparoscopy and NOTES with air. NOTES with CO2 appears to elicit a stronger stress response in this study than standard or low-pressure laparoscopy or NOTES with air.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3551-3558
Number of pages8
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume29
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery
Laparoscopy
Insufflation
Pressure
Air
Swine
Animal Care Committees
Sus scrofa
Pneumoperitoneum
Random Allocation
Acidosis
Serum
Epinephrine
Analysis of Variance
Colon
Spleen
Gases
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Urine

Keywords

  • Bowel
  • Clinical papers/trials/research
  • CO
  • Endoscopy
  • Pneumoperitoneum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Randomized trial on the physiologic impact of NOTES. / Bingener, Juliane; Loomis, Erica A.; Huebner, Marianne; Gostout, Christopher J.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 29, No. 12, 01.12.2015, p. 3551-3558.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bingener, Juliane ; Loomis, Erica A. ; Huebner, Marianne ; Gostout, Christopher J. / Randomized trial on the physiologic impact of NOTES. In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2015 ; Vol. 29, No. 12. pp. 3551-3558.
@article{18f21d2cb5bc4a978076a0a11ef4a32b,
title = "Randomized trial on the physiologic impact of NOTES",
abstract = "Background: Our previous work revealed significantly less acidosis in swine undergoing natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using endoscopic air insufflation than swine undergoing standard laparoscopy. We wanted to evaluate the differential effects of CO2 versus intra-abdominal pressure as source for this finding. In addition, we investigated the endocrine stress response between swine undergoing NOTES peritoneoscopy with CO2 insufflation and animals undergoing standard diagnostic laparoscopy with CO2. Materials and methods: Twenty-eight (28) female 50-kg domestic pigs were randomly assigned to one of four groups using a permuted block randomization table: Group 1: NOTES using CO2 insufflation, Group 2: NOTES using air insufflation, Group 3: laparoscopy max pressure 12 mmHg and Group 4: laparoscopy with max pressure 7 mmHg. Invasive monitoring lines were placed. Pneumoperitoneum was established by the respective method and maintained for 90 min, visualizing liver, spleen and colon. Arterial blood gas was obtained at baseline and four additional time points. Serum TNF-α for POD (postoperative day) 1 and cumulative urine adrenaline for the procedure were determined by ELISA. ANOVA and t test were used for statistical comparison. The study was Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees approved. Results: All experiments were completed as outlined. Blood pH showed a significant difference between groups. Serum TNF-α revealed higher levels for NOTES CO2 on POD 1 than standard laparoscopy (p = 0.03). Conclusion: NOTES animals with CO2 insufflation initially experienced similar pH compared to standard laparoscopy but recovered to levels seen in low-pressure laparoscopy and NOTES with air. NOTES with CO2 appears to elicit a stronger stress response in this study than standard or low-pressure laparoscopy or NOTES with air.",
keywords = "Bowel, Clinical papers/trials/research, CO, Endoscopy, Pneumoperitoneum",
author = "Juliane Bingener and Loomis, {Erica A.} and Marianne Huebner and Gostout, {Christopher J.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-015-4106-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "3551--3558",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized trial on the physiologic impact of NOTES

AU - Bingener, Juliane

AU - Loomis, Erica A.

AU - Huebner, Marianne

AU - Gostout, Christopher J.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Background: Our previous work revealed significantly less acidosis in swine undergoing natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using endoscopic air insufflation than swine undergoing standard laparoscopy. We wanted to evaluate the differential effects of CO2 versus intra-abdominal pressure as source for this finding. In addition, we investigated the endocrine stress response between swine undergoing NOTES peritoneoscopy with CO2 insufflation and animals undergoing standard diagnostic laparoscopy with CO2. Materials and methods: Twenty-eight (28) female 50-kg domestic pigs were randomly assigned to one of four groups using a permuted block randomization table: Group 1: NOTES using CO2 insufflation, Group 2: NOTES using air insufflation, Group 3: laparoscopy max pressure 12 mmHg and Group 4: laparoscopy with max pressure 7 mmHg. Invasive monitoring lines were placed. Pneumoperitoneum was established by the respective method and maintained for 90 min, visualizing liver, spleen and colon. Arterial blood gas was obtained at baseline and four additional time points. Serum TNF-α for POD (postoperative day) 1 and cumulative urine adrenaline for the procedure were determined by ELISA. ANOVA and t test were used for statistical comparison. The study was Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees approved. Results: All experiments were completed as outlined. Blood pH showed a significant difference between groups. Serum TNF-α revealed higher levels for NOTES CO2 on POD 1 than standard laparoscopy (p = 0.03). Conclusion: NOTES animals with CO2 insufflation initially experienced similar pH compared to standard laparoscopy but recovered to levels seen in low-pressure laparoscopy and NOTES with air. NOTES with CO2 appears to elicit a stronger stress response in this study than standard or low-pressure laparoscopy or NOTES with air.

AB - Background: Our previous work revealed significantly less acidosis in swine undergoing natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using endoscopic air insufflation than swine undergoing standard laparoscopy. We wanted to evaluate the differential effects of CO2 versus intra-abdominal pressure as source for this finding. In addition, we investigated the endocrine stress response between swine undergoing NOTES peritoneoscopy with CO2 insufflation and animals undergoing standard diagnostic laparoscopy with CO2. Materials and methods: Twenty-eight (28) female 50-kg domestic pigs were randomly assigned to one of four groups using a permuted block randomization table: Group 1: NOTES using CO2 insufflation, Group 2: NOTES using air insufflation, Group 3: laparoscopy max pressure 12 mmHg and Group 4: laparoscopy with max pressure 7 mmHg. Invasive monitoring lines were placed. Pneumoperitoneum was established by the respective method and maintained for 90 min, visualizing liver, spleen and colon. Arterial blood gas was obtained at baseline and four additional time points. Serum TNF-α for POD (postoperative day) 1 and cumulative urine adrenaline for the procedure were determined by ELISA. ANOVA and t test were used for statistical comparison. The study was Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees approved. Results: All experiments were completed as outlined. Blood pH showed a significant difference between groups. Serum TNF-α revealed higher levels for NOTES CO2 on POD 1 than standard laparoscopy (p = 0.03). Conclusion: NOTES animals with CO2 insufflation initially experienced similar pH compared to standard laparoscopy but recovered to levels seen in low-pressure laparoscopy and NOTES with air. NOTES with CO2 appears to elicit a stronger stress response in this study than standard or low-pressure laparoscopy or NOTES with air.

KW - Bowel

KW - Clinical papers/trials/research

KW - CO

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Pneumoperitoneum

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947484687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947484687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-015-4106-0

DO - 10.1007/s00464-015-4106-0

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 3551

EP - 3558

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 12

ER -