Randomized trial addressing risk features and time factors of surgery plus radiotherapy in advanced head-and-neck cancer

K. Kian Ang, Andy Trotti, Barry W. Brown, Adam S. Garden, Robert L. Foote, William H. Morrison, Fady B. Geara, Douglas W. Klotch, Helmuth Goepfert, Lester J. Peters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

381 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: A multi-institutional, prospective, randomized trial was undertaken in patients with advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma to address (1) the validity of using pathologic risk features, established from a previous study, to determine the need for, and dose of, postoperative radiotherapy (PORT); (2) the impact of accelerating PORT using a concomitant boost schedule; and (3) the importance of the overall combined treatment duration on the treatment outcome. Methods and Materials: Of 288 consecutive patients with advanced disease registered preoperatively, 213 fulfilled the trial criteria and went on to receive therapy predicated on a set of pathologic risk features: no PORT for the low-risk group (n=31); 57.6 Gy during 6.5 weeks for the intermediate-risk group (n=31); and, by random assignment, 63 Gy during 5 weeks (n=76) or 7 weeks (n=75) for the high-risk group. Patients were irradiated with standard techniques appropriate to the site of disease and likely areas of spread. The study end points were locoregional control (LRC), survival, and morbidity. Results: Patients with low or intermediate risks had significantly higher LRC and survival rates than those with high-risk features (p=0.003 and p=0.0001, respectively), despite receiving no PORT or lower dose PORT, respectively. For high-risk patients, a trend toward higher LRC and survival rates was noted when PORT was delivered in 5 rather than 7 weeks. A prolonged interval between surgery and PORT in the 7-week schedule was associated with significantly lower LRC (p=0.03) and survival (p=0.01) rates. Consequently, the cumulative duration of combined therapy had a significant impact on the LRC (p=0.005) and survival (p=0.03) rates. A 2-week reduction in the PORT duration by using the concomitant boost technique did not increase the late treatment toxicity. Conclusions: This Phase III trial established the power of risk assessment using pathologic features in determining the need for, and dose of, PORT in patients with advanced head-and-neck squamous cell cancer in a prospective, multi-institutional setting. It also revealed the impact of the overall treatment time in the combination of surgery and PORT on the outcome in high-risk patients and showed that PORT acceleration without a reduction in dose by a concomitant boost regimen did not increase the late complication rate. These findings emphasize the importance of coordinated interdisciplinary care in the delivery of combined surgery and RT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)571-578
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2001

Fingerprint

Head and Neck Neoplasms
surgery
radiation therapy
Radiotherapy
cancer
acceleration (physics)
dosage
schedules
Survival
therapy
Appointments and Schedules
Survival Rate
Therapeutics
Squamous Cell Neoplasms
risk assessment
toxicity
delivery
Head
Morbidity
intervals

Keywords

  • Head-and-neck cancer
  • Overall treatment time
  • Postoperative radiotherapy
  • Prognostic variables
  • Risk grouping

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiation

Cite this

Randomized trial addressing risk features and time factors of surgery plus radiotherapy in advanced head-and-neck cancer. / Ang, K. Kian; Trotti, Andy; Brown, Barry W.; Garden, Adam S.; Foote, Robert L.; Morrison, William H.; Geara, Fady B.; Klotch, Douglas W.; Goepfert, Helmuth; Peters, Lester J.

In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol. 51, No. 3, 01.11.2001, p. 571-578.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ang, KK, Trotti, A, Brown, BW, Garden, AS, Foote, RL, Morrison, WH, Geara, FB, Klotch, DW, Goepfert, H & Peters, LJ 2001, 'Randomized trial addressing risk features and time factors of surgery plus radiotherapy in advanced head-and-neck cancer', International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 571-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01690-X
Ang, K. Kian ; Trotti, Andy ; Brown, Barry W. ; Garden, Adam S. ; Foote, Robert L. ; Morrison, William H. ; Geara, Fady B. ; Klotch, Douglas W. ; Goepfert, Helmuth ; Peters, Lester J. / Randomized trial addressing risk features and time factors of surgery plus radiotherapy in advanced head-and-neck cancer. In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2001 ; Vol. 51, No. 3. pp. 571-578.
@article{6e04156724be44e8a74cd78c9ceccf51,
title = "Randomized trial addressing risk features and time factors of surgery plus radiotherapy in advanced head-and-neck cancer",
abstract = "Purpose: A multi-institutional, prospective, randomized trial was undertaken in patients with advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma to address (1) the validity of using pathologic risk features, established from a previous study, to determine the need for, and dose of, postoperative radiotherapy (PORT); (2) the impact of accelerating PORT using a concomitant boost schedule; and (3) the importance of the overall combined treatment duration on the treatment outcome. Methods and Materials: Of 288 consecutive patients with advanced disease registered preoperatively, 213 fulfilled the trial criteria and went on to receive therapy predicated on a set of pathologic risk features: no PORT for the low-risk group (n=31); 57.6 Gy during 6.5 weeks for the intermediate-risk group (n=31); and, by random assignment, 63 Gy during 5 weeks (n=76) or 7 weeks (n=75) for the high-risk group. Patients were irradiated with standard techniques appropriate to the site of disease and likely areas of spread. The study end points were locoregional control (LRC), survival, and morbidity. Results: Patients with low or intermediate risks had significantly higher LRC and survival rates than those with high-risk features (p=0.003 and p=0.0001, respectively), despite receiving no PORT or lower dose PORT, respectively. For high-risk patients, a trend toward higher LRC and survival rates was noted when PORT was delivered in 5 rather than 7 weeks. A prolonged interval between surgery and PORT in the 7-week schedule was associated with significantly lower LRC (p=0.03) and survival (p=0.01) rates. Consequently, the cumulative duration of combined therapy had a significant impact on the LRC (p=0.005) and survival (p=0.03) rates. A 2-week reduction in the PORT duration by using the concomitant boost technique did not increase the late treatment toxicity. Conclusions: This Phase III trial established the power of risk assessment using pathologic features in determining the need for, and dose of, PORT in patients with advanced head-and-neck squamous cell cancer in a prospective, multi-institutional setting. It also revealed the impact of the overall treatment time in the combination of surgery and PORT on the outcome in high-risk patients and showed that PORT acceleration without a reduction in dose by a concomitant boost regimen did not increase the late complication rate. These findings emphasize the importance of coordinated interdisciplinary care in the delivery of combined surgery and RT.",
keywords = "Head-and-neck cancer, Overall treatment time, Postoperative radiotherapy, Prognostic variables, Risk grouping",
author = "Ang, {K. Kian} and Andy Trotti and Brown, {Barry W.} and Garden, {Adam S.} and Foote, {Robert L.} and Morrison, {William H.} and Geara, {Fady B.} and Klotch, {Douglas W.} and Helmuth Goepfert and Peters, {Lester J.}",
year = "2001",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01690-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "571--578",
journal = "International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics",
issn = "0360-3016",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized trial addressing risk features and time factors of surgery plus radiotherapy in advanced head-and-neck cancer

AU - Ang, K. Kian

AU - Trotti, Andy

AU - Brown, Barry W.

AU - Garden, Adam S.

AU - Foote, Robert L.

AU - Morrison, William H.

AU - Geara, Fady B.

AU - Klotch, Douglas W.

AU - Goepfert, Helmuth

AU - Peters, Lester J.

PY - 2001/11/1

Y1 - 2001/11/1

N2 - Purpose: A multi-institutional, prospective, randomized trial was undertaken in patients with advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma to address (1) the validity of using pathologic risk features, established from a previous study, to determine the need for, and dose of, postoperative radiotherapy (PORT); (2) the impact of accelerating PORT using a concomitant boost schedule; and (3) the importance of the overall combined treatment duration on the treatment outcome. Methods and Materials: Of 288 consecutive patients with advanced disease registered preoperatively, 213 fulfilled the trial criteria and went on to receive therapy predicated on a set of pathologic risk features: no PORT for the low-risk group (n=31); 57.6 Gy during 6.5 weeks for the intermediate-risk group (n=31); and, by random assignment, 63 Gy during 5 weeks (n=76) or 7 weeks (n=75) for the high-risk group. Patients were irradiated with standard techniques appropriate to the site of disease and likely areas of spread. The study end points were locoregional control (LRC), survival, and morbidity. Results: Patients with low or intermediate risks had significantly higher LRC and survival rates than those with high-risk features (p=0.003 and p=0.0001, respectively), despite receiving no PORT or lower dose PORT, respectively. For high-risk patients, a trend toward higher LRC and survival rates was noted when PORT was delivered in 5 rather than 7 weeks. A prolonged interval between surgery and PORT in the 7-week schedule was associated with significantly lower LRC (p=0.03) and survival (p=0.01) rates. Consequently, the cumulative duration of combined therapy had a significant impact on the LRC (p=0.005) and survival (p=0.03) rates. A 2-week reduction in the PORT duration by using the concomitant boost technique did not increase the late treatment toxicity. Conclusions: This Phase III trial established the power of risk assessment using pathologic features in determining the need for, and dose of, PORT in patients with advanced head-and-neck squamous cell cancer in a prospective, multi-institutional setting. It also revealed the impact of the overall treatment time in the combination of surgery and PORT on the outcome in high-risk patients and showed that PORT acceleration without a reduction in dose by a concomitant boost regimen did not increase the late complication rate. These findings emphasize the importance of coordinated interdisciplinary care in the delivery of combined surgery and RT.

AB - Purpose: A multi-institutional, prospective, randomized trial was undertaken in patients with advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma to address (1) the validity of using pathologic risk features, established from a previous study, to determine the need for, and dose of, postoperative radiotherapy (PORT); (2) the impact of accelerating PORT using a concomitant boost schedule; and (3) the importance of the overall combined treatment duration on the treatment outcome. Methods and Materials: Of 288 consecutive patients with advanced disease registered preoperatively, 213 fulfilled the trial criteria and went on to receive therapy predicated on a set of pathologic risk features: no PORT for the low-risk group (n=31); 57.6 Gy during 6.5 weeks for the intermediate-risk group (n=31); and, by random assignment, 63 Gy during 5 weeks (n=76) or 7 weeks (n=75) for the high-risk group. Patients were irradiated with standard techniques appropriate to the site of disease and likely areas of spread. The study end points were locoregional control (LRC), survival, and morbidity. Results: Patients with low or intermediate risks had significantly higher LRC and survival rates than those with high-risk features (p=0.003 and p=0.0001, respectively), despite receiving no PORT or lower dose PORT, respectively. For high-risk patients, a trend toward higher LRC and survival rates was noted when PORT was delivered in 5 rather than 7 weeks. A prolonged interval between surgery and PORT in the 7-week schedule was associated with significantly lower LRC (p=0.03) and survival (p=0.01) rates. Consequently, the cumulative duration of combined therapy had a significant impact on the LRC (p=0.005) and survival (p=0.03) rates. A 2-week reduction in the PORT duration by using the concomitant boost technique did not increase the late treatment toxicity. Conclusions: This Phase III trial established the power of risk assessment using pathologic features in determining the need for, and dose of, PORT in patients with advanced head-and-neck squamous cell cancer in a prospective, multi-institutional setting. It also revealed the impact of the overall treatment time in the combination of surgery and PORT on the outcome in high-risk patients and showed that PORT acceleration without a reduction in dose by a concomitant boost regimen did not increase the late complication rate. These findings emphasize the importance of coordinated interdisciplinary care in the delivery of combined surgery and RT.

KW - Head-and-neck cancer

KW - Overall treatment time

KW - Postoperative radiotherapy

KW - Prognostic variables

KW - Risk grouping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035501324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035501324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01690-X

DO - 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01690-X

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 571

EP - 578

JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

SN - 0360-3016

IS - 3

ER -