Randomized Controlled Trials in Surgical Oncology

. Where Do We Stand?

Kellie L. Mathis, Heidi Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reviews the history of clinical trials in surgery using breast cancer surgery and rectal cancer surgery as examples. Trials in breast cancer have transformed the surgical management of this disease. Rectal cancer surgery has also changed greatly, but much of this evolution occurred outside the setting of clinical trials. This article highlights the strengths and limitations of surgical trials and suggests that future studies should include pretrial credentialing as a requirement for surgeon participation. More work needs to be done to bridge the gap from trial results to implementation of new techniques in clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)449-466
Number of pages18
JournalSurgical Oncology Clinics of North America
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

Randomized Controlled Trials
Rectal Neoplasms
Clinical Trials
Breast Neoplasms
Credentialing
Disease Management
History
Surgical Oncology

Keywords

  • Oncology
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Rectal cancer
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Randomized Controlled Trials in Surgical Oncology : . Where Do We Stand? / Mathis, Kellie L.; Nelson, Heidi.

In: Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America, Vol. 21, No. 3, 07.2012, p. 449-466.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f0160aba7edd438884781d9ac54519dd,
title = "Randomized Controlled Trials in Surgical Oncology: . Where Do We Stand?",
abstract = "This article reviews the history of clinical trials in surgery using breast cancer surgery and rectal cancer surgery as examples. Trials in breast cancer have transformed the surgical management of this disease. Rectal cancer surgery has also changed greatly, but much of this evolution occurred outside the setting of clinical trials. This article highlights the strengths and limitations of surgical trials and suggests that future studies should include pretrial credentialing as a requirement for surgeon participation. More work needs to be done to bridge the gap from trial results to implementation of new techniques in clinical practice.",
keywords = "Oncology, Randomized controlled trial, Rectal cancer, Surgery",
author = "Mathis, {Kellie L.} and Heidi Nelson",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.soc.2012.03.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "449--466",
journal = "Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America",
issn = "1055-3207",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized Controlled Trials in Surgical Oncology

T2 - . Where Do We Stand?

AU - Mathis, Kellie L.

AU - Nelson, Heidi

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - This article reviews the history of clinical trials in surgery using breast cancer surgery and rectal cancer surgery as examples. Trials in breast cancer have transformed the surgical management of this disease. Rectal cancer surgery has also changed greatly, but much of this evolution occurred outside the setting of clinical trials. This article highlights the strengths and limitations of surgical trials and suggests that future studies should include pretrial credentialing as a requirement for surgeon participation. More work needs to be done to bridge the gap from trial results to implementation of new techniques in clinical practice.

AB - This article reviews the history of clinical trials in surgery using breast cancer surgery and rectal cancer surgery as examples. Trials in breast cancer have transformed the surgical management of this disease. Rectal cancer surgery has also changed greatly, but much of this evolution occurred outside the setting of clinical trials. This article highlights the strengths and limitations of surgical trials and suggests that future studies should include pretrial credentialing as a requirement for surgeon participation. More work needs to be done to bridge the gap from trial results to implementation of new techniques in clinical practice.

KW - Oncology

KW - Randomized controlled trial

KW - Rectal cancer

KW - Surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860845433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860845433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.soc.2012.03.002

DO - 10.1016/j.soc.2012.03.002

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 449

EP - 466

JO - Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America

JF - Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America

SN - 1055-3207

IS - 3

ER -