Randomized comparison of the Personality Assessment Inventory and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 in the epilepsy monitoring unit

Dona E Locke, Kristin A. Kirlin, Rebecca Wershba, David Osborne, Joseph F. Drazkowski, Joseph I. Sirven, Katherine H. Noe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The two most common personality measures used in evaluation of patients on epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) are the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Both have been evaluated separately for their ability to distinguish patients with epilepsy from patients with psychogenic events, but they have never been compared directly. The primary aim of this study was to provide comparison data in an EMU population between the PAI, MMPI-2, and the MMPI-2-RF (MMPI-2 Restructured Form). Results show that the PAI Somatic Complaints (SOM) scale and the Conversion subscale (SOM-C), with classification rates of 79%, outperform other indicators from the PAI and indicators from the MMPI-2 and the MMPI-2-RF. Given its other strengths combined with better diagnostic validity performance, the PAI may be the better personality assessment measure for use in distinguishing patients with epilepsy from those with psychogenic seizures in the EMU.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)397-401
Number of pages5
JournalEpilepsy and Behavior
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

Personality Assessment
Personality Inventory
MMPI
Epilepsy
Medical Errors
Aptitude
Personality
Seizures
Population

Keywords

  • Epilepsy
  • Epilepsy monitoring unit
  • Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2
  • Neuropsychology
  • Personality Assessment Inventory
  • Psychogenic seizures
  • Restructured form

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Neurology

Cite this

Randomized comparison of the Personality Assessment Inventory and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 in the epilepsy monitoring unit. / Locke, Dona E; Kirlin, Kristin A.; Wershba, Rebecca; Osborne, David; Drazkowski, Joseph F.; Sirven, Joseph I.; Noe, Katherine H.

In: Epilepsy and Behavior, Vol. 21, No. 4, 08.2011, p. 397-401.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Locke, Dona E ; Kirlin, Kristin A. ; Wershba, Rebecca ; Osborne, David ; Drazkowski, Joseph F. ; Sirven, Joseph I. ; Noe, Katherine H. / Randomized comparison of the Personality Assessment Inventory and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 in the epilepsy monitoring unit. In: Epilepsy and Behavior. 2011 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 397-401.
@article{91b934228d984b2eb40e8bf375b905b9,
title = "Randomized comparison of the Personality Assessment Inventory and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 in the epilepsy monitoring unit",
abstract = "The two most common personality measures used in evaluation of patients on epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) are the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Both have been evaluated separately for their ability to distinguish patients with epilepsy from patients with psychogenic events, but they have never been compared directly. The primary aim of this study was to provide comparison data in an EMU population between the PAI, MMPI-2, and the MMPI-2-RF (MMPI-2 Restructured Form). Results show that the PAI Somatic Complaints (SOM) scale and the Conversion subscale (SOM-C), with classification rates of 79{\%}, outperform other indicators from the PAI and indicators from the MMPI-2 and the MMPI-2-RF. Given its other strengths combined with better diagnostic validity performance, the PAI may be the better personality assessment measure for use in distinguishing patients with epilepsy from those with psychogenic seizures in the EMU.",
keywords = "Epilepsy, Epilepsy monitoring unit, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2, Neuropsychology, Personality Assessment Inventory, Psychogenic seizures, Restructured form",
author = "Locke, {Dona E} and Kirlin, {Kristin A.} and Rebecca Wershba and David Osborne and Drazkowski, {Joseph F.} and Sirven, {Joseph I.} and Noe, {Katherine H.}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.05.023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "397--401",
journal = "Epilepsy and Behavior",
issn = "1525-5050",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized comparison of the Personality Assessment Inventory and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 in the epilepsy monitoring unit

AU - Locke, Dona E

AU - Kirlin, Kristin A.

AU - Wershba, Rebecca

AU - Osborne, David

AU - Drazkowski, Joseph F.

AU - Sirven, Joseph I.

AU - Noe, Katherine H.

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - The two most common personality measures used in evaluation of patients on epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) are the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Both have been evaluated separately for their ability to distinguish patients with epilepsy from patients with psychogenic events, but they have never been compared directly. The primary aim of this study was to provide comparison data in an EMU population between the PAI, MMPI-2, and the MMPI-2-RF (MMPI-2 Restructured Form). Results show that the PAI Somatic Complaints (SOM) scale and the Conversion subscale (SOM-C), with classification rates of 79%, outperform other indicators from the PAI and indicators from the MMPI-2 and the MMPI-2-RF. Given its other strengths combined with better diagnostic validity performance, the PAI may be the better personality assessment measure for use in distinguishing patients with epilepsy from those with psychogenic seizures in the EMU.

AB - The two most common personality measures used in evaluation of patients on epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) are the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Both have been evaluated separately for their ability to distinguish patients with epilepsy from patients with psychogenic events, but they have never been compared directly. The primary aim of this study was to provide comparison data in an EMU population between the PAI, MMPI-2, and the MMPI-2-RF (MMPI-2 Restructured Form). Results show that the PAI Somatic Complaints (SOM) scale and the Conversion subscale (SOM-C), with classification rates of 79%, outperform other indicators from the PAI and indicators from the MMPI-2 and the MMPI-2-RF. Given its other strengths combined with better diagnostic validity performance, the PAI may be the better personality assessment measure for use in distinguishing patients with epilepsy from those with psychogenic seizures in the EMU.

KW - Epilepsy

KW - Epilepsy monitoring unit

KW - Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2

KW - Neuropsychology

KW - Personality Assessment Inventory

KW - Psychogenic seizures

KW - Restructured form

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051473099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051473099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.05.023

DO - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.05.023

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 397

EP - 401

JO - Epilepsy and Behavior

JF - Epilepsy and Behavior

SN - 1525-5050

IS - 4

ER -