Randomized clinical trial of liposomal bupivacaine transverse abdominis plane block versus intrathecal analgesia in colorectal surgery

D. T. Colibaseanu, O. Osagiede, A. Merchea, C. T. Ball, E. Bojaxhi, J. K. Panchamia, A. K. Jacob, S. R. Kelley, James M Naessens, David Larson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block is considered an effective alternative to neuraxial analgesia for abdominal surgery. However, limited evidence supports its use over traditional analgesic modalities in colorectal surgery. This study compared the analgesic efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine TAP block with intrathecal (IT) opioid administration in a multicentre RCT. Methods: Patients undergoing elective small bowel or colorectal resection were randomized to receive TAP block or a single injection of IT analgesia with hydromorphone. Patients were assessed at 4, 8, 16, 24 and 48 h after surgery. Primary outcomes were mean pain scores and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) administered within 48 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included duration of hospital stay, incidence of postoperative ileus and use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Results: In total, 209 patients were recruited and 200 completed the trial (TAP 102, IT 98). The TAP group had a 1·6-point greater mean pain score than the IT group at 4 h after surgery, and this difference lasted for 16 h after operation. The TAP group received more MMEs within the first 24 h after surgery than the IT group (median difference in MMEs 10·0, 95 per cent c.i. 3·0 to 20·5). There were no differences in MME use at 24 and 48 h, or with respect to secondary outcomes. Conclusion: IT opioid administration provided better immediate postoperative pain control than TAP block. Both modalities resulted in low pain scores in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery and should be considered in multimodal postoperative analgesic plans. Registration number: NCT02356198 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Colorectal Surgery
Bupivacaine
Analgesia
Randomized Controlled Trials
Morphine
Analgesics
Pain
Opioid Analgesics
Hydromorphone
Spinal Injections
Patient-Controlled Analgesia
Ileus
Postoperative Pain
Length of Stay
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Randomized clinical trial of liposomal bupivacaine transverse abdominis plane block versus intrathecal analgesia in colorectal surgery. / Colibaseanu, D. T.; Osagiede, O.; Merchea, A.; Ball, C. T.; Bojaxhi, E.; Panchamia, J. K.; Jacob, A. K.; Kelley, S. R.; Naessens, James M; Larson, David.

In: British Journal of Surgery, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Colibaseanu, D. T. ; Osagiede, O. ; Merchea, A. ; Ball, C. T. ; Bojaxhi, E. ; Panchamia, J. K. ; Jacob, A. K. ; Kelley, S. R. ; Naessens, James M ; Larson, David. / Randomized clinical trial of liposomal bupivacaine transverse abdominis plane block versus intrathecal analgesia in colorectal surgery. In: British Journal of Surgery. 2019.
@article{d5282bcca1f44b8ab4550f7a502b83b8,
title = "Randomized clinical trial of liposomal bupivacaine transverse abdominis plane block versus intrathecal analgesia in colorectal surgery",
abstract = "Background: Transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block is considered an effective alternative to neuraxial analgesia for abdominal surgery. However, limited evidence supports its use over traditional analgesic modalities in colorectal surgery. This study compared the analgesic efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine TAP block with intrathecal (IT) opioid administration in a multicentre RCT. Methods: Patients undergoing elective small bowel or colorectal resection were randomized to receive TAP block or a single injection of IT analgesia with hydromorphone. Patients were assessed at 4, 8, 16, 24 and 48 h after surgery. Primary outcomes were mean pain scores and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) administered within 48 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included duration of hospital stay, incidence of postoperative ileus and use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Results: In total, 209 patients were recruited and 200 completed the trial (TAP 102, IT 98). The TAP group had a 1·6-point greater mean pain score than the IT group at 4 h after surgery, and this difference lasted for 16 h after operation. The TAP group received more MMEs within the first 24 h after surgery than the IT group (median difference in MMEs 10·0, 95 per cent c.i. 3·0 to 20·5). There were no differences in MME use at 24 and 48 h, or with respect to secondary outcomes. Conclusion: IT opioid administration provided better immediate postoperative pain control than TAP block. Both modalities resulted in low pain scores in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery and should be considered in multimodal postoperative analgesic plans. Registration number: NCT02356198 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).",
author = "Colibaseanu, {D. T.} and O. Osagiede and A. Merchea and Ball, {C. T.} and E. Bojaxhi and Panchamia, {J. K.} and Jacob, {A. K.} and Kelley, {S. R.} and Naessens, {James M} and David Larson",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/bjs.11141",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "British Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0007-1323",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized clinical trial of liposomal bupivacaine transverse abdominis plane block versus intrathecal analgesia in colorectal surgery

AU - Colibaseanu, D. T.

AU - Osagiede, O.

AU - Merchea, A.

AU - Ball, C. T.

AU - Bojaxhi, E.

AU - Panchamia, J. K.

AU - Jacob, A. K.

AU - Kelley, S. R.

AU - Naessens, James M

AU - Larson, David

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block is considered an effective alternative to neuraxial analgesia for abdominal surgery. However, limited evidence supports its use over traditional analgesic modalities in colorectal surgery. This study compared the analgesic efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine TAP block with intrathecal (IT) opioid administration in a multicentre RCT. Methods: Patients undergoing elective small bowel or colorectal resection were randomized to receive TAP block or a single injection of IT analgesia with hydromorphone. Patients were assessed at 4, 8, 16, 24 and 48 h after surgery. Primary outcomes were mean pain scores and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) administered within 48 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included duration of hospital stay, incidence of postoperative ileus and use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Results: In total, 209 patients were recruited and 200 completed the trial (TAP 102, IT 98). The TAP group had a 1·6-point greater mean pain score than the IT group at 4 h after surgery, and this difference lasted for 16 h after operation. The TAP group received more MMEs within the first 24 h after surgery than the IT group (median difference in MMEs 10·0, 95 per cent c.i. 3·0 to 20·5). There were no differences in MME use at 24 and 48 h, or with respect to secondary outcomes. Conclusion: IT opioid administration provided better immediate postoperative pain control than TAP block. Both modalities resulted in low pain scores in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery and should be considered in multimodal postoperative analgesic plans. Registration number: NCT02356198 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

AB - Background: Transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block is considered an effective alternative to neuraxial analgesia for abdominal surgery. However, limited evidence supports its use over traditional analgesic modalities in colorectal surgery. This study compared the analgesic efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine TAP block with intrathecal (IT) opioid administration in a multicentre RCT. Methods: Patients undergoing elective small bowel or colorectal resection were randomized to receive TAP block or a single injection of IT analgesia with hydromorphone. Patients were assessed at 4, 8, 16, 24 and 48 h after surgery. Primary outcomes were mean pain scores and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) administered within 48 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included duration of hospital stay, incidence of postoperative ileus and use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Results: In total, 209 patients were recruited and 200 completed the trial (TAP 102, IT 98). The TAP group had a 1·6-point greater mean pain score than the IT group at 4 h after surgery, and this difference lasted for 16 h after operation. The TAP group received more MMEs within the first 24 h after surgery than the IT group (median difference in MMEs 10·0, 95 per cent c.i. 3·0 to 20·5). There were no differences in MME use at 24 and 48 h, or with respect to secondary outcomes. Conclusion: IT opioid administration provided better immediate postoperative pain control than TAP block. Both modalities resulted in low pain scores in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery and should be considered in multimodal postoperative analgesic plans. Registration number: NCT02356198 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063643424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063643424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bjs.11141

DO - 10.1002/bjs.11141

M3 - Article

C2 - 30919948

AN - SCOPUS:85063643424

JO - British Journal of Surgery

JF - British Journal of Surgery

SN - 0007-1323

ER -