Radiosurgery to the postoperative surgical cavity: Who needs evidence?

David Roberge, Ian Parney, Paul D. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

55 Scopus citations

Abstract

There is a growing interest in adjuvant radiosurgery after resection of hematogenous brain metastases. This is exemplified by the approximately 1000 cases reported in mainly retrospective series. These cases fall into four paradigms: adjuvant radiosurgery as an alternative to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), radiosurgery neoadjuvant to the surgical resection, radiosurgery as an intensification of adjuvant WBRT, and adjuvant radiosurgery for patients having failed prior WBRT. These procedures seem well tolerated, with an approximate 5% risk of radiation necrosis. Although crude local control rates for each strategy seem improved over surgery alone, multiple biases make comparisons with standard WBRT difficult without prospective data. Because evidence lags behind clinical practice, an upcoming intergroup trial will aim to clarify the value of the most common tumor bed radiosurgery strategy by randomizing oligometastatic patients between adjuvant WBRT and adjuvant radiosurgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)486-493
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume83
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2012

Keywords

  • Brain metastases
  • Microsurgery
  • Stereotactic radiosurgery
  • Whole-brain radiotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Radiosurgery to the postoperative surgical cavity: Who needs evidence?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this