Radiologic evaluation of soft tissue tumors

Mark D. Murphey, Mark J. Kransdorf

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The goals of imaging of soft tissue tumors are threefold: (1) lesion detection, (2) identifying a specific diagnosis or reasonable differential diagnosis, and (3) lesion staging. The radiologic evaluation of soft tissue tumors to achieve these goals has markedly evolved, improved, and expanded with the advent of computerized tomography (CT) and particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). CT and more recently MRI allow lesion detection and staging by delineating anatomic extent in essentially all cases and relatively specific diagnosis in approximately 25% to 50% of soft tissue tumors.1-7 We would suggest that evaluation of soft tissue tumors is now similar to that of bone tumors in that pathologic diagnosis should incorporate the imaging findings in most cases. This is particularly true in large tumors in which only a small amount of tissue might be available for histologic review initially and there is doubt about whether the tissue is a true representation of the entire lesion. As in bone tumors, close working relationship among three groups of physicians is needed: the pathologist, radiologist, and orthopedic oncologist. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a framework for the use of radiologic evaluation of soft tissue tumors. Although this approach reviews multiple imaging modalities, the authors emphasize MRI because it is generally considered the optimal radiologic tool in evaluation of soft tissue tumors. The annual incidence of benign soft tissue tumors has been estimated at 300 per 100,000 people, leading to an estimated 750,000 to 800,000 lesions in the United States.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationModern Soft Tissue Pathology: Tumors and Non-Neoplastic Conditions
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages11-43
Number of pages33
ISBN (Electronic)9780511781049
ISBN (Print)9780521874090
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Neoplasms
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Tomography
Bone and Bones
Orthopedics
Differential Diagnosis
Physicians
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Murphey, M. D., & Kransdorf, M. J. (2010). Radiologic evaluation of soft tissue tumors. In Modern Soft Tissue Pathology: Tumors and Non-Neoplastic Conditions (pp. 11-43). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781049.003

Radiologic evaluation of soft tissue tumors. / Murphey, Mark D.; Kransdorf, Mark J.

Modern Soft Tissue Pathology: Tumors and Non-Neoplastic Conditions. Cambridge University Press, 2010. p. 11-43.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Murphey, MD & Kransdorf, MJ 2010, Radiologic evaluation of soft tissue tumors. in Modern Soft Tissue Pathology: Tumors and Non-Neoplastic Conditions. Cambridge University Press, pp. 11-43. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781049.003
Murphey MD, Kransdorf MJ. Radiologic evaluation of soft tissue tumors. In Modern Soft Tissue Pathology: Tumors and Non-Neoplastic Conditions. Cambridge University Press. 2010. p. 11-43 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781049.003
Murphey, Mark D. ; Kransdorf, Mark J. / Radiologic evaluation of soft tissue tumors. Modern Soft Tissue Pathology: Tumors and Non-Neoplastic Conditions. Cambridge University Press, 2010. pp. 11-43
@inbook{e4597e0de78c4609ba4912ddb756a932,
title = "Radiologic evaluation of soft tissue tumors",
abstract = "The goals of imaging of soft tissue tumors are threefold: (1) lesion detection, (2) identifying a specific diagnosis or reasonable differential diagnosis, and (3) lesion staging. The radiologic evaluation of soft tissue tumors to achieve these goals has markedly evolved, improved, and expanded with the advent of computerized tomography (CT) and particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). CT and more recently MRI allow lesion detection and staging by delineating anatomic extent in essentially all cases and relatively specific diagnosis in approximately 25{\%} to 50{\%} of soft tissue tumors.1-7 We would suggest that evaluation of soft tissue tumors is now similar to that of bone tumors in that pathologic diagnosis should incorporate the imaging findings in most cases. This is particularly true in large tumors in which only a small amount of tissue might be available for histologic review initially and there is doubt about whether the tissue is a true representation of the entire lesion. As in bone tumors, close working relationship among three groups of physicians is needed: the pathologist, radiologist, and orthopedic oncologist. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a framework for the use of radiologic evaluation of soft tissue tumors. Although this approach reviews multiple imaging modalities, the authors emphasize MRI because it is generally considered the optimal radiologic tool in evaluation of soft tissue tumors. The annual incidence of benign soft tissue tumors has been estimated at 300 per 100,000 people, leading to an estimated 750,000 to 800,000 lesions in the United States.",
author = "Murphey, {Mark D.} and Kransdorf, {Mark J.}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511781049.003",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521874090",
pages = "11--43",
booktitle = "Modern Soft Tissue Pathology: Tumors and Non-Neoplastic Conditions",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Radiologic evaluation of soft tissue tumors

AU - Murphey, Mark D.

AU - Kransdorf, Mark J.

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - The goals of imaging of soft tissue tumors are threefold: (1) lesion detection, (2) identifying a specific diagnosis or reasonable differential diagnosis, and (3) lesion staging. The radiologic evaluation of soft tissue tumors to achieve these goals has markedly evolved, improved, and expanded with the advent of computerized tomography (CT) and particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). CT and more recently MRI allow lesion detection and staging by delineating anatomic extent in essentially all cases and relatively specific diagnosis in approximately 25% to 50% of soft tissue tumors.1-7 We would suggest that evaluation of soft tissue tumors is now similar to that of bone tumors in that pathologic diagnosis should incorporate the imaging findings in most cases. This is particularly true in large tumors in which only a small amount of tissue might be available for histologic review initially and there is doubt about whether the tissue is a true representation of the entire lesion. As in bone tumors, close working relationship among three groups of physicians is needed: the pathologist, radiologist, and orthopedic oncologist. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a framework for the use of radiologic evaluation of soft tissue tumors. Although this approach reviews multiple imaging modalities, the authors emphasize MRI because it is generally considered the optimal radiologic tool in evaluation of soft tissue tumors. The annual incidence of benign soft tissue tumors has been estimated at 300 per 100,000 people, leading to an estimated 750,000 to 800,000 lesions in the United States.

AB - The goals of imaging of soft tissue tumors are threefold: (1) lesion detection, (2) identifying a specific diagnosis or reasonable differential diagnosis, and (3) lesion staging. The radiologic evaluation of soft tissue tumors to achieve these goals has markedly evolved, improved, and expanded with the advent of computerized tomography (CT) and particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). CT and more recently MRI allow lesion detection and staging by delineating anatomic extent in essentially all cases and relatively specific diagnosis in approximately 25% to 50% of soft tissue tumors.1-7 We would suggest that evaluation of soft tissue tumors is now similar to that of bone tumors in that pathologic diagnosis should incorporate the imaging findings in most cases. This is particularly true in large tumors in which only a small amount of tissue might be available for histologic review initially and there is doubt about whether the tissue is a true representation of the entire lesion. As in bone tumors, close working relationship among three groups of physicians is needed: the pathologist, radiologist, and orthopedic oncologist. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a framework for the use of radiologic evaluation of soft tissue tumors. Although this approach reviews multiple imaging modalities, the authors emphasize MRI because it is generally considered the optimal radiologic tool in evaluation of soft tissue tumors. The annual incidence of benign soft tissue tumors has been estimated at 300 per 100,000 people, leading to an estimated 750,000 to 800,000 lesions in the United States.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012136632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012136632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511781049.003

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511781049.003

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780521874090

SP - 11

EP - 43

BT - Modern Soft Tissue Pathology: Tumors and Non-Neoplastic Conditions

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -