TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiologic assessment of reverse shoulder arthroplasty
AU - Roberts, Catherine C.
AU - Ekelund, Anders L.
AU - Renfree, Kevin J.
AU - Liu, Patrick T.
AU - Chew, Felix S.
PY - 2007/1
Y1 - 2007/1
N2 - The reverse shoulder prosthesis was approved for clinical use in the United States in March 2004. This new prosthesis reverses the normal ball-and-socket relationship of the shoulder joint. As a result of replacement of the glenoid component with a ball and of the humeral head with a socket, the center of rotation is moved distally and medially, allowing more control of shoulder motion by the deltoid muscle. This improved geometric configuration allows shoulder reconstruction in patients who have irreparable rotator cuff damage with secondary arthropathy, pain, and "pseudoparalysis" (ie, inability to lift the arm above the horizontal). Patients experience a significant improvement in range of motion and markedly decreased pain after undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty; however, the procedure is associated with a relatively high rate of complications, including dislocation, infection, loosening, malpositioning of the glenoid component or fixation screws, disassembly of the humeral component, periprosthetic fracture, and inferior glenoid impingement leading to scapular erosion. Therefore, it is important that the radiologist be familiar with the normal and abnormal imaging appearances of this new prosthesis.
AB - The reverse shoulder prosthesis was approved for clinical use in the United States in March 2004. This new prosthesis reverses the normal ball-and-socket relationship of the shoulder joint. As a result of replacement of the glenoid component with a ball and of the humeral head with a socket, the center of rotation is moved distally and medially, allowing more control of shoulder motion by the deltoid muscle. This improved geometric configuration allows shoulder reconstruction in patients who have irreparable rotator cuff damage with secondary arthropathy, pain, and "pseudoparalysis" (ie, inability to lift the arm above the horizontal). Patients experience a significant improvement in range of motion and markedly decreased pain after undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty; however, the procedure is associated with a relatively high rate of complications, including dislocation, infection, loosening, malpositioning of the glenoid component or fixation screws, disassembly of the humeral component, periprosthetic fracture, and inferior glenoid impingement leading to scapular erosion. Therefore, it is important that the radiologist be familiar with the normal and abnormal imaging appearances of this new prosthesis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847043617&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847043617&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/rg.271065076
DO - 10.1148/rg.271065076
M3 - Review article
C2 - 17235009
AN - SCOPUS:33847043617
SN - 0271-5333
VL - 27
SP - 223
EP - 235
JO - Radiographics
JF - Radiographics
IS - 1
ER -