Radiocapitellar stability

The effect of soft tissue integrity on bipolar versus monopolar radial head prostheses

Cholawish Chanlalit, Dave R. Shukla, James S. Fitzsimmons, Andrew R. Thoreson, Kai N. An, Shawn W. O'Driscoll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Radiocapitellar stability depends, in part, on concavity-compression mechanics. This study was conducted to examine the effects of the soft tissues on radiocapitellar stability with radial head prostheses. Hypothesis: Monopolar radial head implants are more effective in stabilizing the radiocapitellar joint than bipolar radial head prostheses, with the soft tissues intact or repaired. Materials and methods: Twelve fresh frozen elbow specimens were used to evaluate radiocapitellar stability with monopolar and bipolar radial heads. The study variables focused on varying soft tissue conditions and examined the mean peak subluxation forces put forth by each prosthesis design. Results: With the soft tissues intact, the mean peak force resisting posterior subluxation depended significantly on the radial head used (P = 03). Peak force was greatest for the native radial head (32 ± 7 N) and least with the bipolar prosthesis (12 ± 3 N), with the monopolar prosthesis falling in between (21 ± 4 N). The presence of soft tissues significantly affected the bipolar implant's ability to resist subluxation, though it did not significantly impact the native or monopolar radial heads. Discussion: This study reveals the dependence of radiocapitellar stability on soft tissue integrity, particularly for bipolar prostheses. Overall, monopolar prostheses have a better capacity to resist radiocapitellar subluxation. Conclusion: From a biomechanical perspective, the enhancement of elbow stability with a monopolar radial head prosthesis is superior to that with a bipolar design. This is especially true when the integrity of the soft tissues has been compromised, such as in trauma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-225
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Prostheses and Implants
Elbow
Prosthesis Design
Mechanics
Joints
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Basic Science Biomechanical Laboratory Study
  • Elbow joint
  • Instability
  • Ligaments, fracture-dislocation
  • Radial head prosthesis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Radiocapitellar stability : The effect of soft tissue integrity on bipolar versus monopolar radial head prostheses. / Chanlalit, Cholawish; Shukla, Dave R.; Fitzsimmons, James S.; Thoreson, Andrew R.; An, Kai N.; O'Driscoll, Shawn W.

In: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Vol. 20, No. 2, 03.2011, p. 219-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chanlalit, Cholawish ; Shukla, Dave R. ; Fitzsimmons, James S. ; Thoreson, Andrew R. ; An, Kai N. ; O'Driscoll, Shawn W. / Radiocapitellar stability : The effect of soft tissue integrity on bipolar versus monopolar radial head prostheses. In: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2011 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 219-225.
@article{a4495af3d82e4cfb97fc4d599d183a0d,
title = "Radiocapitellar stability: The effect of soft tissue integrity on bipolar versus monopolar radial head prostheses",
abstract = "Introduction: Radiocapitellar stability depends, in part, on concavity-compression mechanics. This study was conducted to examine the effects of the soft tissues on radiocapitellar stability with radial head prostheses. Hypothesis: Monopolar radial head implants are more effective in stabilizing the radiocapitellar joint than bipolar radial head prostheses, with the soft tissues intact or repaired. Materials and methods: Twelve fresh frozen elbow specimens were used to evaluate radiocapitellar stability with monopolar and bipolar radial heads. The study variables focused on varying soft tissue conditions and examined the mean peak subluxation forces put forth by each prosthesis design. Results: With the soft tissues intact, the mean peak force resisting posterior subluxation depended significantly on the radial head used (P = 03). Peak force was greatest for the native radial head (32 ± 7 N) and least with the bipolar prosthesis (12 ± 3 N), with the monopolar prosthesis falling in between (21 ± 4 N). The presence of soft tissues significantly affected the bipolar implant's ability to resist subluxation, though it did not significantly impact the native or monopolar radial heads. Discussion: This study reveals the dependence of radiocapitellar stability on soft tissue integrity, particularly for bipolar prostheses. Overall, monopolar prostheses have a better capacity to resist radiocapitellar subluxation. Conclusion: From a biomechanical perspective, the enhancement of elbow stability with a monopolar radial head prosthesis is superior to that with a bipolar design. This is especially true when the integrity of the soft tissues has been compromised, such as in trauma.",
keywords = "Basic Science Biomechanical Laboratory Study, Elbow joint, Instability, Ligaments, fracture-dislocation, Radial head prosthesis",
author = "Cholawish Chanlalit and Shukla, {Dave R.} and Fitzsimmons, {James S.} and Thoreson, {Andrew R.} and An, {Kai N.} and O'Driscoll, {Shawn W.}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jse.2010.10.033",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "219--225",
journal = "Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery",
issn = "1058-2746",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiocapitellar stability

T2 - The effect of soft tissue integrity on bipolar versus monopolar radial head prostheses

AU - Chanlalit, Cholawish

AU - Shukla, Dave R.

AU - Fitzsimmons, James S.

AU - Thoreson, Andrew R.

AU - An, Kai N.

AU - O'Driscoll, Shawn W.

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Introduction: Radiocapitellar stability depends, in part, on concavity-compression mechanics. This study was conducted to examine the effects of the soft tissues on radiocapitellar stability with radial head prostheses. Hypothesis: Monopolar radial head implants are more effective in stabilizing the radiocapitellar joint than bipolar radial head prostheses, with the soft tissues intact or repaired. Materials and methods: Twelve fresh frozen elbow specimens were used to evaluate radiocapitellar stability with monopolar and bipolar radial heads. The study variables focused on varying soft tissue conditions and examined the mean peak subluxation forces put forth by each prosthesis design. Results: With the soft tissues intact, the mean peak force resisting posterior subluxation depended significantly on the radial head used (P = 03). Peak force was greatest for the native radial head (32 ± 7 N) and least with the bipolar prosthesis (12 ± 3 N), with the monopolar prosthesis falling in between (21 ± 4 N). The presence of soft tissues significantly affected the bipolar implant's ability to resist subluxation, though it did not significantly impact the native or monopolar radial heads. Discussion: This study reveals the dependence of radiocapitellar stability on soft tissue integrity, particularly for bipolar prostheses. Overall, monopolar prostheses have a better capacity to resist radiocapitellar subluxation. Conclusion: From a biomechanical perspective, the enhancement of elbow stability with a monopolar radial head prosthesis is superior to that with a bipolar design. This is especially true when the integrity of the soft tissues has been compromised, such as in trauma.

AB - Introduction: Radiocapitellar stability depends, in part, on concavity-compression mechanics. This study was conducted to examine the effects of the soft tissues on radiocapitellar stability with radial head prostheses. Hypothesis: Monopolar radial head implants are more effective in stabilizing the radiocapitellar joint than bipolar radial head prostheses, with the soft tissues intact or repaired. Materials and methods: Twelve fresh frozen elbow specimens were used to evaluate radiocapitellar stability with monopolar and bipolar radial heads. The study variables focused on varying soft tissue conditions and examined the mean peak subluxation forces put forth by each prosthesis design. Results: With the soft tissues intact, the mean peak force resisting posterior subluxation depended significantly on the radial head used (P = 03). Peak force was greatest for the native radial head (32 ± 7 N) and least with the bipolar prosthesis (12 ± 3 N), with the monopolar prosthesis falling in between (21 ± 4 N). The presence of soft tissues significantly affected the bipolar implant's ability to resist subluxation, though it did not significantly impact the native or monopolar radial heads. Discussion: This study reveals the dependence of radiocapitellar stability on soft tissue integrity, particularly for bipolar prostheses. Overall, monopolar prostheses have a better capacity to resist radiocapitellar subluxation. Conclusion: From a biomechanical perspective, the enhancement of elbow stability with a monopolar radial head prosthesis is superior to that with a bipolar design. This is especially true when the integrity of the soft tissues has been compromised, such as in trauma.

KW - Basic Science Biomechanical Laboratory Study

KW - Elbow joint

KW - Instability

KW - Ligaments, fracture-dislocation

KW - Radial head prosthesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79251508312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79251508312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jse.2010.10.033

DO - 10.1016/j.jse.2010.10.033

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 219

EP - 225

JO - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

JF - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

SN - 1058-2746

IS - 2

ER -