Radiocapitellar joint stability with bipolar versus monopolar radial head prostheses

Jun Gyu Moon, Lawrence J. Berglund, Domire Zachary, Kai Nan An, Shawn W. O'Driscoll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Bipolar and monopolar designs are both available for replacement of the radial head. Few data exist comparing the biomechanical characteristics of these 2 quite different prostheses. This study evaluated the relative contribution to radiocapitellar stability by concavity compression with these 2 types of radial head prostheses. Methods: The study used 12 fresh frozen elbow cadavers. The capitellum of the distal humerus and 3 different conditions of radial head (native, monopolar and bipolar) were tested for radiocapitellar joint stability. Results: The monopolar metallic head and the native radial head behaved similarly regarding resistance to subluxation. The bipolar head behaved in an entirely opposite manner than the native and monopolar head and actually acted to facilitate subluxation. Conclusions: Mobility of radial head components, such as in the bipolar radial head, has a compromising effect on the concavity compression stability of the radiocapitellar joint. A monopolar implant is more effective in stabilizing the radiocapitellar joint than a bipolar radial head prosthesis. Level of evidence: Basic science biomechanical laboratory study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)779-784
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

Prostheses and Implants
Joints
Head
Humerus
Elbow
Cadaver

Keywords

  • arthroplasty
  • bipolar
  • capitellum
  • distal humerus
  • monopolar
  • prosthesis
  • Radial head replacement
  • radio-capitellar joint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Radiocapitellar joint stability with bipolar versus monopolar radial head prostheses. / Moon, Jun Gyu; Berglund, Lawrence J.; Zachary, Domire; An, Kai Nan; O'Driscoll, Shawn W.

In: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Vol. 18, No. 5, 09.2009, p. 779-784.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moon, Jun Gyu ; Berglund, Lawrence J. ; Zachary, Domire ; An, Kai Nan ; O'Driscoll, Shawn W. / Radiocapitellar joint stability with bipolar versus monopolar radial head prostheses. In: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2009 ; Vol. 18, No. 5. pp. 779-784.
@article{5e857d2b166c4b4b8e6948f431154da2,
title = "Radiocapitellar joint stability with bipolar versus monopolar radial head prostheses",
abstract = "Background: Bipolar and monopolar designs are both available for replacement of the radial head. Few data exist comparing the biomechanical characteristics of these 2 quite different prostheses. This study evaluated the relative contribution to radiocapitellar stability by concavity compression with these 2 types of radial head prostheses. Methods: The study used 12 fresh frozen elbow cadavers. The capitellum of the distal humerus and 3 different conditions of radial head (native, monopolar and bipolar) were tested for radiocapitellar joint stability. Results: The monopolar metallic head and the native radial head behaved similarly regarding resistance to subluxation. The bipolar head behaved in an entirely opposite manner than the native and monopolar head and actually acted to facilitate subluxation. Conclusions: Mobility of radial head components, such as in the bipolar radial head, has a compromising effect on the concavity compression stability of the radiocapitellar joint. A monopolar implant is more effective in stabilizing the radiocapitellar joint than a bipolar radial head prosthesis. Level of evidence: Basic science biomechanical laboratory study.",
keywords = "arthroplasty, bipolar, capitellum, distal humerus, monopolar, prosthesis, Radial head replacement, radio-capitellar joint",
author = "Moon, {Jun Gyu} and Berglund, {Lawrence J.} and Domire Zachary and An, {Kai Nan} and O'Driscoll, {Shawn W.}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jse.2009.02.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "779--784",
journal = "Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery",
issn = "1058-2746",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiocapitellar joint stability with bipolar versus monopolar radial head prostheses

AU - Moon, Jun Gyu

AU - Berglund, Lawrence J.

AU - Zachary, Domire

AU - An, Kai Nan

AU - O'Driscoll, Shawn W.

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Background: Bipolar and monopolar designs are both available for replacement of the radial head. Few data exist comparing the biomechanical characteristics of these 2 quite different prostheses. This study evaluated the relative contribution to radiocapitellar stability by concavity compression with these 2 types of radial head prostheses. Methods: The study used 12 fresh frozen elbow cadavers. The capitellum of the distal humerus and 3 different conditions of radial head (native, monopolar and bipolar) were tested for radiocapitellar joint stability. Results: The monopolar metallic head and the native radial head behaved similarly regarding resistance to subluxation. The bipolar head behaved in an entirely opposite manner than the native and monopolar head and actually acted to facilitate subluxation. Conclusions: Mobility of radial head components, such as in the bipolar radial head, has a compromising effect on the concavity compression stability of the radiocapitellar joint. A monopolar implant is more effective in stabilizing the radiocapitellar joint than a bipolar radial head prosthesis. Level of evidence: Basic science biomechanical laboratory study.

AB - Background: Bipolar and monopolar designs are both available for replacement of the radial head. Few data exist comparing the biomechanical characteristics of these 2 quite different prostheses. This study evaluated the relative contribution to radiocapitellar stability by concavity compression with these 2 types of radial head prostheses. Methods: The study used 12 fresh frozen elbow cadavers. The capitellum of the distal humerus and 3 different conditions of radial head (native, monopolar and bipolar) were tested for radiocapitellar joint stability. Results: The monopolar metallic head and the native radial head behaved similarly regarding resistance to subluxation. The bipolar head behaved in an entirely opposite manner than the native and monopolar head and actually acted to facilitate subluxation. Conclusions: Mobility of radial head components, such as in the bipolar radial head, has a compromising effect on the concavity compression stability of the radiocapitellar joint. A monopolar implant is more effective in stabilizing the radiocapitellar joint than a bipolar radial head prosthesis. Level of evidence: Basic science biomechanical laboratory study.

KW - arthroplasty

KW - bipolar

KW - capitellum

KW - distal humerus

KW - monopolar

KW - prosthesis

KW - Radial head replacement

KW - radio-capitellar joint

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68749093874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68749093874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jse.2009.02.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jse.2009.02.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 19427239

AN - SCOPUS:68749093874

VL - 18

SP - 779

EP - 784

JO - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

JF - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

SN - 1058-2746

IS - 5

ER -