Race and the validity of self-reported cancer screening behaviors: Development of a conceptual model

Diana J. Burgess, Adam A. Powell, Joan Griffin, Melissa R. Partin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Many estimates of cancer screening are based on self-reported screening behavior. There is growing concern that self-reported screening measures may be less accurate among members of racial and ethnic minority groups. This would have considerable implications for research on racial and ethnic disparities in cancer screening. Objectives: To review the literature on the relationship between race/ethnicity and the accuracy of self-reported cancer screening behavior and develop a conceptual framework that would provide a deeper understanding of factors underlying this relationship. Methods: We developed a conceptual framework drawing from diverse literatures including validation studies examining the accuracy of self-reported cancer screening behaviors and articles on survey response bias. Results and conclusions: Evidence suggests that racial and ethnic minorities may be less likely to provide accurate reports of their cancer screening behavior and that overreporting may be particularly problematic. Research conducted in other areas suggests that these sources of measurement error may stem from cognitive and motivational processes and that they can be moderated by question wording and data collection characteristics. At this point, however, the quality of the evidence is not strong and more research is needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-107
Number of pages9
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Research
Minority Groups
Validation Studies
Ethnic Groups
Research Design

Keywords

  • African Americans
  • Cancer screening
  • Disparities
  • Ethnic groups
  • Minority groups
  • Race/ethnicity
  • Self-report
  • Social cognition
  • Survey methods
  • Validation studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Race and the validity of self-reported cancer screening behaviors : Development of a conceptual model. / Burgess, Diana J.; Powell, Adam A.; Griffin, Joan; Partin, Melissa R.

In: Preventive Medicine, Vol. 48, No. 2, 02.2009, p. 99-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Burgess, Diana J. ; Powell, Adam A. ; Griffin, Joan ; Partin, Melissa R. / Race and the validity of self-reported cancer screening behaviors : Development of a conceptual model. In: Preventive Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 48, No. 2. pp. 99-107.
@article{a5fed7c8ab3e44138b5398a42031af08,
title = "Race and the validity of self-reported cancer screening behaviors: Development of a conceptual model",
abstract = "Background: Many estimates of cancer screening are based on self-reported screening behavior. There is growing concern that self-reported screening measures may be less accurate among members of racial and ethnic minority groups. This would have considerable implications for research on racial and ethnic disparities in cancer screening. Objectives: To review the literature on the relationship between race/ethnicity and the accuracy of self-reported cancer screening behavior and develop a conceptual framework that would provide a deeper understanding of factors underlying this relationship. Methods: We developed a conceptual framework drawing from diverse literatures including validation studies examining the accuracy of self-reported cancer screening behaviors and articles on survey response bias. Results and conclusions: Evidence suggests that racial and ethnic minorities may be less likely to provide accurate reports of their cancer screening behavior and that overreporting may be particularly problematic. Research conducted in other areas suggests that these sources of measurement error may stem from cognitive and motivational processes and that they can be moderated by question wording and data collection characteristics. At this point, however, the quality of the evidence is not strong and more research is needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn.",
keywords = "African Americans, Cancer screening, Disparities, Ethnic groups, Minority groups, Race/ethnicity, Self-report, Social cognition, Survey methods, Validation studies",
author = "Burgess, {Diana J.} and Powell, {Adam A.} and Joan Griffin and Partin, {Melissa R.}",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.11.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "99--107",
journal = "Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Race and the validity of self-reported cancer screening behaviors

T2 - Development of a conceptual model

AU - Burgess, Diana J.

AU - Powell, Adam A.

AU - Griffin, Joan

AU - Partin, Melissa R.

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - Background: Many estimates of cancer screening are based on self-reported screening behavior. There is growing concern that self-reported screening measures may be less accurate among members of racial and ethnic minority groups. This would have considerable implications for research on racial and ethnic disparities in cancer screening. Objectives: To review the literature on the relationship between race/ethnicity and the accuracy of self-reported cancer screening behavior and develop a conceptual framework that would provide a deeper understanding of factors underlying this relationship. Methods: We developed a conceptual framework drawing from diverse literatures including validation studies examining the accuracy of self-reported cancer screening behaviors and articles on survey response bias. Results and conclusions: Evidence suggests that racial and ethnic minorities may be less likely to provide accurate reports of their cancer screening behavior and that overreporting may be particularly problematic. Research conducted in other areas suggests that these sources of measurement error may stem from cognitive and motivational processes and that they can be moderated by question wording and data collection characteristics. At this point, however, the quality of the evidence is not strong and more research is needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn.

AB - Background: Many estimates of cancer screening are based on self-reported screening behavior. There is growing concern that self-reported screening measures may be less accurate among members of racial and ethnic minority groups. This would have considerable implications for research on racial and ethnic disparities in cancer screening. Objectives: To review the literature on the relationship between race/ethnicity and the accuracy of self-reported cancer screening behavior and develop a conceptual framework that would provide a deeper understanding of factors underlying this relationship. Methods: We developed a conceptual framework drawing from diverse literatures including validation studies examining the accuracy of self-reported cancer screening behaviors and articles on survey response bias. Results and conclusions: Evidence suggests that racial and ethnic minorities may be less likely to provide accurate reports of their cancer screening behavior and that overreporting may be particularly problematic. Research conducted in other areas suggests that these sources of measurement error may stem from cognitive and motivational processes and that they can be moderated by question wording and data collection characteristics. At this point, however, the quality of the evidence is not strong and more research is needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn.

KW - African Americans

KW - Cancer screening

KW - Disparities

KW - Ethnic groups

KW - Minority groups

KW - Race/ethnicity

KW - Self-report

KW - Social cognition

KW - Survey methods

KW - Validation studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59649130029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59649130029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.11.014

DO - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.11.014

M3 - Review article

C2 - 19118570

AN - SCOPUS:59649130029

VL - 48

SP - 99

EP - 107

JO - Preventive Medicine

JF - Preventive Medicine

SN - 0091-7435

IS - 2

ER -