TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantitative proteomics for identification of cancer biomarkers
AU - Chaerkady, Raghothama
AU - Pandey, Akhilesh
PY - 2007/9/1
Y1 - 2007/9/1
N2 - Quantitative proteomics can be used for the identification of cancer biomarkers that could be used or early detection, serve as therapeutic targets, or monitor response to treatment. Several quantitative proteomics tools are currently available to study differential expression of proteins in samples ranging from cancer cell lines to tissues to body fluids. 2-DE, which was classically used for proteomic profiling, has been coupled to fluorescence labeling for differential proteomics. Isotope labeling methods such as stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC), isotope-coded affinity tagging (ICAT), isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ), and 18O labeling have all been used in quantitative approaches for identification of cancer biomarkers. In addition, heavy isotope labeled peptides can be used to obtain absolute quantitative data. Most recently, label-free methods for quantitative proteomics, which have the potential of replacing isotope-labeling strategies, are becoming popular. other emerging technologies such as protein microarrays have the potential for providing additional opportunities for biomarker identification. This review highlights commonly used methods for quantitative proteomic analysis and their advantages and limitations for cancer biomarker analysis.
AB - Quantitative proteomics can be used for the identification of cancer biomarkers that could be used or early detection, serve as therapeutic targets, or monitor response to treatment. Several quantitative proteomics tools are currently available to study differential expression of proteins in samples ranging from cancer cell lines to tissues to body fluids. 2-DE, which was classically used for proteomic profiling, has been coupled to fluorescence labeling for differential proteomics. Isotope labeling methods such as stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC), isotope-coded affinity tagging (ICAT), isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ), and 18O labeling have all been used in quantitative approaches for identification of cancer biomarkers. In addition, heavy isotope labeled peptides can be used to obtain absolute quantitative data. Most recently, label-free methods for quantitative proteomics, which have the potential of replacing isotope-labeling strategies, are becoming popular. other emerging technologies such as protein microarrays have the potential for providing additional opportunities for biomarker identification. This review highlights commonly used methods for quantitative proteomic analysis and their advantages and limitations for cancer biomarker analysis.
KW - Multiplexing
KW - Screening
KW - Stable isotope labeling
KW - Validation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38349159301&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38349159301&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/prca.200700284
DO - 10.1002/prca.200700284
M3 - Review article
C2 - 21136759
AN - SCOPUS:38349159301
SN - 1862-8346
VL - 1
SP - 1080
EP - 1089
JO - Proteomics - Clinical Applications
JF - Proteomics - Clinical Applications
IS - 9
ER -