TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantification of asymptomatic kidney stone burden by computed tomography for predicting future symptomatic stone events
AU - Selby, Michael G.
AU - Vrtiska, Terri J.
AU - Krambeck, Amy E.
AU - McCollough, Cynthia H.
AU - Elsherbiny, Hisham E.
AU - Bergstralh, Eric J.
AU - Lieske, John C.
AU - Rule, Andrew D.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding Support: This project was supported by grants from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases ( Mayo Clinic O'Brien Urology Research Center , DK100227 and DK83007 ) and made possible by the Rochester Epidemiology Project from the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health Service (AG034676).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - Objective To find the optimal characterization of asymptomatic radiographic stone burden on computed tomography (CT) scans.Methods A survey was sent to stone formers who underwent a CT scan while asymptomatic during a stone clinic evaluation. Symptomatic stone passage events after CT scan were detected by survey and medical record review. Radiographic stone burden was quantified by number of stones, largest stone diameter, automated total stone volume (TSV), and bilateral stones and then compared as predictors of stone events.Results There were 550 stone formers; 43% had a stone event for a median of 4.7 years after the CT scan. Stone burden by quartiles was 0-1, 2-3, 4-6, and ≥7 for number of stones; 0-2, 3-4, 5-7, and ≥8 mm for largest stone diameter; and 0-8, 9-78, 79-280, and ≥281 mm3 for TSV; 48% had bilateral stones. The hazard ratios (HRs) for symptomatic event was 1.30 (P <.001) for the number of stones per quartile, 1.26 (P <.001) for largest stone diameter per quartile, 1.38 (P <.001) for TSV per quartile, and 1.80 (P <.001) for bilateral stones. On multivariate analysis, only TSV was an independent predictor of symptomatic events (HR, 1.35 per quartile; P =.01). This risk of events with TSV was also independent of demographics, urine chemistries, and stone composition. Among the 53 patients with interim events between CT scans, a rapid increase in TSV between CT scans (>570 mm3 per year) predicted subsequent events (HR, 2.8; P =.05).Conclusion Automated TSV is more predictive of symptomatic events than manual methods for quantifying stone burden on CT scan.
AB - Objective To find the optimal characterization of asymptomatic radiographic stone burden on computed tomography (CT) scans.Methods A survey was sent to stone formers who underwent a CT scan while asymptomatic during a stone clinic evaluation. Symptomatic stone passage events after CT scan were detected by survey and medical record review. Radiographic stone burden was quantified by number of stones, largest stone diameter, automated total stone volume (TSV), and bilateral stones and then compared as predictors of stone events.Results There were 550 stone formers; 43% had a stone event for a median of 4.7 years after the CT scan. Stone burden by quartiles was 0-1, 2-3, 4-6, and ≥7 for number of stones; 0-2, 3-4, 5-7, and ≥8 mm for largest stone diameter; and 0-8, 9-78, 79-280, and ≥281 mm3 for TSV; 48% had bilateral stones. The hazard ratios (HRs) for symptomatic event was 1.30 (P <.001) for the number of stones per quartile, 1.26 (P <.001) for largest stone diameter per quartile, 1.38 (P <.001) for TSV per quartile, and 1.80 (P <.001) for bilateral stones. On multivariate analysis, only TSV was an independent predictor of symptomatic events (HR, 1.35 per quartile; P =.01). This risk of events with TSV was also independent of demographics, urine chemistries, and stone composition. Among the 53 patients with interim events between CT scans, a rapid increase in TSV between CT scans (>570 mm3 per year) predicted subsequent events (HR, 2.8; P =.05).Conclusion Automated TSV is more predictive of symptomatic events than manual methods for quantifying stone burden on CT scan.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84918783261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84918783261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.031
DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.031
M3 - Article
C2 - 25440821
AN - SCOPUS:84918783261
SN - 0090-4295
VL - 85
SP - 45
EP - 50
JO - Urology
JF - Urology
IS - 1
ER -