Pulmonary resistance during halothane anesthesia is not determined only by airway caliber

David Oman Warner, J. Vetterman, V. Brusdasco, K. Rehder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies of the effect of halothane on airway smooth muscle have used pulmonary resistance as an index of airway caliber. However, pulmonary resistance (R(L)) is the sum of airway resistance (R(aw)), which changes with airway caliber, and of tissue resistance (R(ti)), which depends on the pressure-volume hysteresis of the lung. To separate the effects of halothane on airway caliber from its possible effects on tissue pressure-volume hysteresis in the unstimulated lung and during bronchoconstriction, the authors measured both components of R(L) before and during vagus nerve stimulation in 12 dogs before and during halothane administration R(ti) was always the major component of R(L), constituting 77 ± 14% (mean ± SD) or R(L) before vagus nerve stimulation and 64 ± 21% of R(L) during stimulation in the absence of halothane. Vagus nerve stimulation caused approximately equal increases in both R(ti) and R(aw). Halothane attenuated the response of both R(ti) and R(aw) to vagus nerve stimulation in a dose-dependent fashion. At 1 MAC, the R(ti) response was 44 ± 13% of its value before halothane administration and the R(aw) response was 32 ± 12% of its value before halothane administration; these responses were not significantly different. The authors conclude that changes in R(L) during halothane administration are caused not only by changes in airway caliber, as previously assumed, but also reflect a significant effect of halothane on lung tissue pressure-volume hysteresis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)453-460
Number of pages8
JournalAnesthesiology
Volume70
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1989

Fingerprint

Halothane
Anesthesia
Lung
Vagus Nerve Stimulation
Pressure
Airway Resistance
Bronchoconstriction
Smooth Muscle
Dogs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Pulmonary resistance during halothane anesthesia is not determined only by airway caliber. / Warner, David Oman; Vetterman, J.; Brusdasco, V.; Rehder, K.

In: Anesthesiology, Vol. 70, No. 3, 1989, p. 453-460.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Warner, DO, Vetterman, J, Brusdasco, V & Rehder, K 1989, 'Pulmonary resistance during halothane anesthesia is not determined only by airway caliber', Anesthesiology, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 453-460.
Warner, David Oman ; Vetterman, J. ; Brusdasco, V. ; Rehder, K. / Pulmonary resistance during halothane anesthesia is not determined only by airway caliber. In: Anesthesiology. 1989 ; Vol. 70, No. 3. pp. 453-460.
@article{7f23fc3d3bec4eb0b3c90aee39378f0f,
title = "Pulmonary resistance during halothane anesthesia is not determined only by airway caliber",
abstract = "Studies of the effect of halothane on airway smooth muscle have used pulmonary resistance as an index of airway caliber. However, pulmonary resistance (R(L)) is the sum of airway resistance (R(aw)), which changes with airway caliber, and of tissue resistance (R(ti)), which depends on the pressure-volume hysteresis of the lung. To separate the effects of halothane on airway caliber from its possible effects on tissue pressure-volume hysteresis in the unstimulated lung and during bronchoconstriction, the authors measured both components of R(L) before and during vagus nerve stimulation in 12 dogs before and during halothane administration R(ti) was always the major component of R(L), constituting 77 ± 14{\%} (mean ± SD) or R(L) before vagus nerve stimulation and 64 ± 21{\%} of R(L) during stimulation in the absence of halothane. Vagus nerve stimulation caused approximately equal increases in both R(ti) and R(aw). Halothane attenuated the response of both R(ti) and R(aw) to vagus nerve stimulation in a dose-dependent fashion. At 1 MAC, the R(ti) response was 44 ± 13{\%} of its value before halothane administration and the R(aw) response was 32 ± 12{\%} of its value before halothane administration; these responses were not significantly different. The authors conclude that changes in R(L) during halothane administration are caused not only by changes in airway caliber, as previously assumed, but also reflect a significant effect of halothane on lung tissue pressure-volume hysteresis.",
author = "Warner, {David Oman} and J. Vetterman and V. Brusdasco and K. Rehder",
year = "1989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "453--460",
journal = "Anesthesiology",
issn = "0003-3022",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pulmonary resistance during halothane anesthesia is not determined only by airway caliber

AU - Warner, David Oman

AU - Vetterman, J.

AU - Brusdasco, V.

AU - Rehder, K.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - Studies of the effect of halothane on airway smooth muscle have used pulmonary resistance as an index of airway caliber. However, pulmonary resistance (R(L)) is the sum of airway resistance (R(aw)), which changes with airway caliber, and of tissue resistance (R(ti)), which depends on the pressure-volume hysteresis of the lung. To separate the effects of halothane on airway caliber from its possible effects on tissue pressure-volume hysteresis in the unstimulated lung and during bronchoconstriction, the authors measured both components of R(L) before and during vagus nerve stimulation in 12 dogs before and during halothane administration R(ti) was always the major component of R(L), constituting 77 ± 14% (mean ± SD) or R(L) before vagus nerve stimulation and 64 ± 21% of R(L) during stimulation in the absence of halothane. Vagus nerve stimulation caused approximately equal increases in both R(ti) and R(aw). Halothane attenuated the response of both R(ti) and R(aw) to vagus nerve stimulation in a dose-dependent fashion. At 1 MAC, the R(ti) response was 44 ± 13% of its value before halothane administration and the R(aw) response was 32 ± 12% of its value before halothane administration; these responses were not significantly different. The authors conclude that changes in R(L) during halothane administration are caused not only by changes in airway caliber, as previously assumed, but also reflect a significant effect of halothane on lung tissue pressure-volume hysteresis.

AB - Studies of the effect of halothane on airway smooth muscle have used pulmonary resistance as an index of airway caliber. However, pulmonary resistance (R(L)) is the sum of airway resistance (R(aw)), which changes with airway caliber, and of tissue resistance (R(ti)), which depends on the pressure-volume hysteresis of the lung. To separate the effects of halothane on airway caliber from its possible effects on tissue pressure-volume hysteresis in the unstimulated lung and during bronchoconstriction, the authors measured both components of R(L) before and during vagus nerve stimulation in 12 dogs before and during halothane administration R(ti) was always the major component of R(L), constituting 77 ± 14% (mean ± SD) or R(L) before vagus nerve stimulation and 64 ± 21% of R(L) during stimulation in the absence of halothane. Vagus nerve stimulation caused approximately equal increases in both R(ti) and R(aw). Halothane attenuated the response of both R(ti) and R(aw) to vagus nerve stimulation in a dose-dependent fashion. At 1 MAC, the R(ti) response was 44 ± 13% of its value before halothane administration and the R(aw) response was 32 ± 12% of its value before halothane administration; these responses were not significantly different. The authors conclude that changes in R(L) during halothane administration are caused not only by changes in airway caliber, as previously assumed, but also reflect a significant effect of halothane on lung tissue pressure-volume hysteresis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024604334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024604334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2923292

AN - SCOPUS:0024604334

VL - 70

SP - 453

EP - 460

JO - Anesthesiology

JF - Anesthesiology

SN - 0003-3022

IS - 3

ER -