Proximal radioulnar synostosis after repair of distal biceps brachii rupture by the two-incision technique. Report of four cases

J. M. Failla, Peter C Amadio, B. F. Morrey, R. D. Beckenbaugh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

180 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In four cases, proximal radioulnar synostosis developed as a complication of distal biceps tendon reattachment through a two-incision technique. The synostosis was excised in all four cases but recurred in two. In each case, the initial reattachment exposed the bicipital tuberosity of the radius anteriorly and exposed the ulna extraperiosteally through a second incision along its subcutaneous border. This two-incision approach may place the patient at risk for synostosis. If two incisions are to be used for distal biceps tendon reattachment, then a limited muscle-splitting approach through the extensor muscle mass, which avoids exposure of the ulna, may be preferable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)133-136
Number of pages4
JournalClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Issue number253
StatePublished - 1990

Fingerprint

Synostosis
Ulna
Tendons
Rupture
Muscles
Radioulnar Synostosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Proximal radioulnar synostosis after repair of distal biceps brachii rupture by the two-incision technique. Report of four cases. / Failla, J. M.; Amadio, Peter C; Morrey, B. F.; Beckenbaugh, R. D.

In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 253, 1990, p. 133-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{73aa1227caf44518bc4fdb638c1b29e1,
title = "Proximal radioulnar synostosis after repair of distal biceps brachii rupture by the two-incision technique. Report of four cases",
abstract = "In four cases, proximal radioulnar synostosis developed as a complication of distal biceps tendon reattachment through a two-incision technique. The synostosis was excised in all four cases but recurred in two. In each case, the initial reattachment exposed the bicipital tuberosity of the radius anteriorly and exposed the ulna extraperiosteally through a second incision along its subcutaneous border. This two-incision approach may place the patient at risk for synostosis. If two incisions are to be used for distal biceps tendon reattachment, then a limited muscle-splitting approach through the extensor muscle mass, which avoids exposure of the ulna, may be preferable.",
author = "Failla, {J. M.} and Amadio, {Peter C} and Morrey, {B. F.} and Beckenbaugh, {R. D.}",
year = "1990",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "133--136",
journal = "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research",
issn = "0009-921X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "253",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proximal radioulnar synostosis after repair of distal biceps brachii rupture by the two-incision technique. Report of four cases

AU - Failla, J. M.

AU - Amadio, Peter C

AU - Morrey, B. F.

AU - Beckenbaugh, R. D.

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - In four cases, proximal radioulnar synostosis developed as a complication of distal biceps tendon reattachment through a two-incision technique. The synostosis was excised in all four cases but recurred in two. In each case, the initial reattachment exposed the bicipital tuberosity of the radius anteriorly and exposed the ulna extraperiosteally through a second incision along its subcutaneous border. This two-incision approach may place the patient at risk for synostosis. If two incisions are to be used for distal biceps tendon reattachment, then a limited muscle-splitting approach through the extensor muscle mass, which avoids exposure of the ulna, may be preferable.

AB - In four cases, proximal radioulnar synostosis developed as a complication of distal biceps tendon reattachment through a two-incision technique. The synostosis was excised in all four cases but recurred in two. In each case, the initial reattachment exposed the bicipital tuberosity of the radius anteriorly and exposed the ulna extraperiosteally through a second incision along its subcutaneous border. This two-incision approach may place the patient at risk for synostosis. If two incisions are to be used for distal biceps tendon reattachment, then a limited muscle-splitting approach through the extensor muscle mass, which avoids exposure of the ulna, may be preferable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025354980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025354980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

SP - 133

EP - 136

JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

SN - 0009-921X

IS - 253

ER -