Provider volume and short-term outcomes following surgery for spinal metastases

Rafael De La Garza-Ramos, Nicholas B. Abt, Panagiotis Kerezoudis, William Krauss, Mohamad Bydon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the impact of surgeon and hospital volume on short-term outcomes following surgery for spinal metastases. Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS; 2003-2009) were extracted. Patients who underwent decompression and/or fusion for metastatic spinal tumors were identified via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Surgeon and hospital volume were evaluated as a continuous variable. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (OR) of in-hospital mortality, post-operative complication development, non-routine discharges, prolonged length of stay, and high hospital charges with increasing surgeon and hospital volume. In total 3,069 admissions were examined. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 4.4% and in-hospital complication rate 29.7%; non-routine discharges occurred in 63.3% of patients. Increasing provider volume was not associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality. However, increasing surgeon volume was associated with significantly lower odds of developing an in-hospital complication (OR 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.85) and having a non-routine discharge (OR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.87). Increasing hospital volume was not associated with lower odds of developing a post-operative complication (OR 1.17; 95% CI, 1.00-1.37), but was associated with lower odds of having a non-routine discharge (OR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.95). Patients operated on by higher volume surgeons were less likely to have a prolonged length of stay (over 14 days); higher hospital volume was associated with increased odds of high hospital charges (over $295,511 USD). In this study utilizing the NIS administrative database, patients with metastatic spinal tumors treated by higher volume surgeons had significantly lower complication rates, were more likely to be discharged home following surgery, and were less likely to have a prolonged length of stay. Increasing hospital volume was associated with lower non-routine discharge rates, but with higher hospital charges. Better outcomes with higher volume surgeons may be a reflection of patient selection, and further research is needed to corroborate our findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)43-46
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Clinical Neuroscience
Volume24
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Neoplasm Metastasis
Hospital Charges
Odds Ratio
Hospital Mortality
Confidence Intervals
Length of Stay
High-Volume Hospitals
Spinal Fusion
International Classification of Diseases
Decompression
Surgeons
Patient Selection
Inpatients
Neoplasms
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Databases
Mortality
Research

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Hospital volume
  • Nationwide Inpatient Sample
  • Outcomes
  • Provider volume
  • Spinal metastases
  • Surgeon volume

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Provider volume and short-term outcomes following surgery for spinal metastases. / De La Garza-Ramos, Rafael; Abt, Nicholas B.; Kerezoudis, Panagiotis; Krauss, William; Bydon, Mohamad.

In: Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, Vol. 24, 01.02.2016, p. 43-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

De La Garza-Ramos, Rafael ; Abt, Nicholas B. ; Kerezoudis, Panagiotis ; Krauss, William ; Bydon, Mohamad. / Provider volume and short-term outcomes following surgery for spinal metastases. In: Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2016 ; Vol. 24. pp. 43-46.
@article{37b552c9b3264ad78ab01c935d635a64,
title = "Provider volume and short-term outcomes following surgery for spinal metastases",
abstract = "This study aimed to analyze the impact of surgeon and hospital volume on short-term outcomes following surgery for spinal metastases. Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS; 2003-2009) were extracted. Patients who underwent decompression and/or fusion for metastatic spinal tumors were identified via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Surgeon and hospital volume were evaluated as a continuous variable. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (OR) of in-hospital mortality, post-operative complication development, non-routine discharges, prolonged length of stay, and high hospital charges with increasing surgeon and hospital volume. In total 3,069 admissions were examined. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 4.4{\%} and in-hospital complication rate 29.7{\%}; non-routine discharges occurred in 63.3{\%} of patients. Increasing provider volume was not associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality. However, increasing surgeon volume was associated with significantly lower odds of developing an in-hospital complication (OR 0.70; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.85) and having a non-routine discharge (OR 0.76; 95{\%} CI, 0.66-0.87). Increasing hospital volume was not associated with lower odds of developing a post-operative complication (OR 1.17; 95{\%} CI, 1.00-1.37), but was associated with lower odds of having a non-routine discharge (OR 0.83; 95{\%} CI, 0.73-0.95). Patients operated on by higher volume surgeons were less likely to have a prolonged length of stay (over 14 days); higher hospital volume was associated with increased odds of high hospital charges (over $295,511 USD). In this study utilizing the NIS administrative database, patients with metastatic spinal tumors treated by higher volume surgeons had significantly lower complication rates, were more likely to be discharged home following surgery, and were less likely to have a prolonged length of stay. Increasing hospital volume was associated with lower non-routine discharge rates, but with higher hospital charges. Better outcomes with higher volume surgeons may be a reflection of patient selection, and further research is needed to corroborate our findings.",
keywords = "Complications, Hospital volume, Nationwide Inpatient Sample, Outcomes, Provider volume, Spinal metastases, Surgeon volume",
author = "{De La Garza-Ramos}, Rafael and Abt, {Nicholas B.} and Panagiotis Kerezoudis and William Krauss and Mohamad Bydon",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jocn.2015.08.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "43--46",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Neuroscience",
issn = "0967-5868",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Provider volume and short-term outcomes following surgery for spinal metastases

AU - De La Garza-Ramos, Rafael

AU - Abt, Nicholas B.

AU - Kerezoudis, Panagiotis

AU - Krauss, William

AU - Bydon, Mohamad

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - This study aimed to analyze the impact of surgeon and hospital volume on short-term outcomes following surgery for spinal metastases. Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS; 2003-2009) were extracted. Patients who underwent decompression and/or fusion for metastatic spinal tumors were identified via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Surgeon and hospital volume were evaluated as a continuous variable. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (OR) of in-hospital mortality, post-operative complication development, non-routine discharges, prolonged length of stay, and high hospital charges with increasing surgeon and hospital volume. In total 3,069 admissions were examined. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 4.4% and in-hospital complication rate 29.7%; non-routine discharges occurred in 63.3% of patients. Increasing provider volume was not associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality. However, increasing surgeon volume was associated with significantly lower odds of developing an in-hospital complication (OR 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.85) and having a non-routine discharge (OR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.87). Increasing hospital volume was not associated with lower odds of developing a post-operative complication (OR 1.17; 95% CI, 1.00-1.37), but was associated with lower odds of having a non-routine discharge (OR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.95). Patients operated on by higher volume surgeons were less likely to have a prolonged length of stay (over 14 days); higher hospital volume was associated with increased odds of high hospital charges (over $295,511 USD). In this study utilizing the NIS administrative database, patients with metastatic spinal tumors treated by higher volume surgeons had significantly lower complication rates, were more likely to be discharged home following surgery, and were less likely to have a prolonged length of stay. Increasing hospital volume was associated with lower non-routine discharge rates, but with higher hospital charges. Better outcomes with higher volume surgeons may be a reflection of patient selection, and further research is needed to corroborate our findings.

AB - This study aimed to analyze the impact of surgeon and hospital volume on short-term outcomes following surgery for spinal metastases. Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS; 2003-2009) were extracted. Patients who underwent decompression and/or fusion for metastatic spinal tumors were identified via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Surgeon and hospital volume were evaluated as a continuous variable. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (OR) of in-hospital mortality, post-operative complication development, non-routine discharges, prolonged length of stay, and high hospital charges with increasing surgeon and hospital volume. In total 3,069 admissions were examined. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 4.4% and in-hospital complication rate 29.7%; non-routine discharges occurred in 63.3% of patients. Increasing provider volume was not associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality. However, increasing surgeon volume was associated with significantly lower odds of developing an in-hospital complication (OR 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.85) and having a non-routine discharge (OR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.87). Increasing hospital volume was not associated with lower odds of developing a post-operative complication (OR 1.17; 95% CI, 1.00-1.37), but was associated with lower odds of having a non-routine discharge (OR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.95). Patients operated on by higher volume surgeons were less likely to have a prolonged length of stay (over 14 days); higher hospital volume was associated with increased odds of high hospital charges (over $295,511 USD). In this study utilizing the NIS administrative database, patients with metastatic spinal tumors treated by higher volume surgeons had significantly lower complication rates, were more likely to be discharged home following surgery, and were less likely to have a prolonged length of stay. Increasing hospital volume was associated with lower non-routine discharge rates, but with higher hospital charges. Better outcomes with higher volume surgeons may be a reflection of patient selection, and further research is needed to corroborate our findings.

KW - Complications

KW - Hospital volume

KW - Nationwide Inpatient Sample

KW - Outcomes

KW - Provider volume

KW - Spinal metastases

KW - Surgeon volume

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954075701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954075701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.08.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.08.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 26412253

AN - SCOPUS:84954075701

VL - 24

SP - 43

EP - 46

JO - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

SN - 0967-5868

ER -