TY - JOUR
T1 - Provider recommendations for colorectal cancer screening in elderly veterans
AU - Kahi, Charles J.
AU - Van Ryn, Michelle
AU - Juliar, Beth
AU - Stuart, Jennifer Schaffter
AU - Imperiale, Thomas F.
N1 - Funding Information:
The survey sample consisted of VA providers who had previously participated in the Share Thoughts on Care study as part of the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) consortium18, and VA primary care providers (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) based at the Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (Indianapolis, Indiana). The details of the Share Thoughts on Care study aims, design, and methods have been previously described18. In brief, CanCORS was organized in 2001 and is composed of six research groups funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and one funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs and NCI. The sample for the present study was drawn from primary care providers at 14 VA medical centers that are part of VA CanCORS (Atlanta,GA; Baltimore, MD; Biloxi, MS; Chicago-Hines and Chicago-Lakeside, IL; Durham, NC; Houston, TX; Indianapolis, IN; Minneapolis, MN; Nashville, TN; New York, NY; Seattle, WA; Temple, TX; Tucson, AZ). Primary care providers at the Roudebush VA Medical Center in Indianapolis were invited to participate regardless of whether they had previously participated in CanCORS. The study was approved by the Indiana University Institutional Review Board, the Roudebush VA Medical Center Research and Development Committee, the CanCORS Ancillary Study Committee, and the CanCORS Publications Committee.
PY - 2009/12
Y1 - 2009/12
N2 - Background: Decisions regarding colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the elderly depend on providers' assessment of likelihood of benefit partly based on patient comorbidity and past screening history. We aimed to describe providers' experiences and practice patterns regarding screening for CRC in elderly patients in the VA system. Methods and Participants: A survey was sent to VA primary care providers who had previously participated in the CanCORS-sponsored Share Thoughts on Care study and at a VA medical center. The surveys consisted of clinical vignettes that varied by patient age (75, 80, or 85 years), comorbidity, and past CRC screening history. Main Results: Completed questionnaires were received from 183 of 351 providers (52%). Ninety-five percent of providers would recommend screening for a healthy 75 year old compared to 66% and 39% for a healthy 80 and 85 year old, respectively (p-values < 0.0001). Providers were more likely to recommend screening for a 75 year old with moderate CHF versus severe CHF [61% versus 15%, OR 9.0 (95% CI 5.8-14.0), p < 0.0001] and more likely to recommend screening for an 80 year old with prior colonoscopy within the preceding 10 years, versus 5 years [42% versus 23%, OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.9-3.5), p < 0.0001]. A substantial minority of respondents (range 15-21%) reported they would screen a 75 year old with an active malignancy, severe CHF, or severe COPD. Provider demographic characteristics were not significantly associated with the probability of a screening recommendation. Conclusions: VA providers incorporate patient age, comorbidity, and past CRC screening history into CRC screening recommendations for elderly veterans; however, substantial proportions of these recommendations are inappropriate.
AB - Background: Decisions regarding colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the elderly depend on providers' assessment of likelihood of benefit partly based on patient comorbidity and past screening history. We aimed to describe providers' experiences and practice patterns regarding screening for CRC in elderly patients in the VA system. Methods and Participants: A survey was sent to VA primary care providers who had previously participated in the CanCORS-sponsored Share Thoughts on Care study and at a VA medical center. The surveys consisted of clinical vignettes that varied by patient age (75, 80, or 85 years), comorbidity, and past CRC screening history. Main Results: Completed questionnaires were received from 183 of 351 providers (52%). Ninety-five percent of providers would recommend screening for a healthy 75 year old compared to 66% and 39% for a healthy 80 and 85 year old, respectively (p-values < 0.0001). Providers were more likely to recommend screening for a 75 year old with moderate CHF versus severe CHF [61% versus 15%, OR 9.0 (95% CI 5.8-14.0), p < 0.0001] and more likely to recommend screening for an 80 year old with prior colonoscopy within the preceding 10 years, versus 5 years [42% versus 23%, OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.9-3.5), p < 0.0001]. A substantial minority of respondents (range 15-21%) reported they would screen a 75 year old with an active malignancy, severe CHF, or severe COPD. Provider demographic characteristics were not significantly associated with the probability of a screening recommendation. Conclusions: VA providers incorporate patient age, comorbidity, and past CRC screening history into CRC screening recommendations for elderly veterans; however, substantial proportions of these recommendations are inappropriate.
KW - Aged
KW - Colorectal cancer
KW - Screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72449167388&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=72449167388&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-009-1110-x
DO - 10.1007/s11606-009-1110-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 19763698
AN - SCOPUS:72449167388
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 24
SP - 1263
EP - 1268
JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine
JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine
IS - 12
ER -