TY - JOUR
T1 - Provider perspectives on integrating family caregivers into patient care encounters
AU - Griffin, Joan M.
AU - Riffin, Catherine
AU - Bangerter, Lauren R.
AU - Schaepe, Karen
AU - Havyer, Rachel D.
N1 - Funding Information:
Joan M. Griffin's effort was supported by the Mayo Clinic's Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Rochester, MN. Dr. Havyer's effort was supported by the Mayo Clinic Department of Medicine Catalyst for Advancing in Academics grant. Dr. Lauren R. Bangerter was an Assistant Professor at Mayo Clinic when this study was conducted. The authors wish to acknowledge the participants who gave their time and shared their experiences for this research and Amanda Nelson for her assistance.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Health Research and Educational Trust.
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Objective: To examine and compare health care provider perceptions for integrating family caregivers into patient encounters and other processes of care by medical specialty. Data Sources/Setting: Data were from 19 interviews conducted in 2018, 10 with primary care or palliative care providers and nine with proceduralists or interventionists in practices located in Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona. Study Design: This was a qualitative study using data collected from one-on-one, semi-structured interviews with physicians. Data Collection: By using purposeful “maximum variation” sampling to capture differences between primary and palliative care providers and proceduralists/interventionists, data were collected, reviewed, coded, and then analyzed using inductive content analysis with a constant comparison approach. Primary Findings: Primary care providers described a lack of organizational and institutional resources to support caregivers. Accordingly, they were compelled to curb caregiver engagement in order to meet patients' clinical care needs within the time and workflow demands in encounters. Proceduralists and interventionists described the need to assess caregivers for suitability to provide care during intense periods of treatment. They reported having access to more formal organizational resources for supporting caregivers. Overall, providers described a paradox, where caregivers are seen as contributing value to patient encounters until they need training, education, or support to provide care, at which point they become burdensome and require more time and resources than are typically available. Conclusions: Results highlight how organizational constraints inhibit caregiver engagement in patient encounters and influence provider attitudes about engaging caregivers and assessing their unmet needs. Findings also provide insights into challenges across practice types for implementing state and federal laws that promote caregiver engagement.
AB - Objective: To examine and compare health care provider perceptions for integrating family caregivers into patient encounters and other processes of care by medical specialty. Data Sources/Setting: Data were from 19 interviews conducted in 2018, 10 with primary care or palliative care providers and nine with proceduralists or interventionists in practices located in Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona. Study Design: This was a qualitative study using data collected from one-on-one, semi-structured interviews with physicians. Data Collection: By using purposeful “maximum variation” sampling to capture differences between primary and palliative care providers and proceduralists/interventionists, data were collected, reviewed, coded, and then analyzed using inductive content analysis with a constant comparison approach. Primary Findings: Primary care providers described a lack of organizational and institutional resources to support caregivers. Accordingly, they were compelled to curb caregiver engagement in order to meet patients' clinical care needs within the time and workflow demands in encounters. Proceduralists and interventionists described the need to assess caregivers for suitability to provide care during intense periods of treatment. They reported having access to more formal organizational resources for supporting caregivers. Overall, providers described a paradox, where caregivers are seen as contributing value to patient encounters until they need training, education, or support to provide care, at which point they become burdensome and require more time and resources than are typically available. Conclusions: Results highlight how organizational constraints inhibit caregiver engagement in patient encounters and influence provider attitudes about engaging caregivers and assessing their unmet needs. Findings also provide insights into challenges across practice types for implementing state and federal laws that promote caregiver engagement.
KW - family caregivers
KW - family members
KW - family-centered care
KW - health care delivery
KW - health care policy
KW - patient-centered care
KW - primary care
KW - qualitative methods
KW - relationship-centered care
KW - specialty care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123679341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123679341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1475-6773.13932
DO - 10.1111/1475-6773.13932
M3 - Article
C2 - 34957543
AN - SCOPUS:85123679341
SN - 0017-9124
VL - 57
SP - 892
EP - 904
JO - Health Services Research
JF - Health Services Research
IS - 4
ER -