TY - JOUR
T1 - Protein
T2 - Nucleic acid interactions. I. Electronic structures of cytosine, indole, and guanine complexes
AU - Ilich, P.
AU - Prendergast, F. G.
PY - 1992/6
Y1 - 1992/6
N2 - Low singlet transition energies and line strengths were calculated for the cytosine : in‐dole : guanine complex by the INDO/1S‐CI method. The chromophores were arranged in three sets of 270 intercalating geometries. Calculations were executed in the supermolecule model with single excited configurations. Errors due to basis set extension and incomplete configuration representation were assessed, for all chromophore pairs, by full BSSE correction calculations and inclusion of double‐excited configurations. The intercalation‐induced perturbations of the principal transitions are characterized by but not limited to (a) a decrease in strength of {π*,π} transitions, (b) increase in strength in {π*,n} transitions, (c) splitting of {π*,π} transitions into components of unequal strength, and (d) energy and strength dependence in mixed transitions on rise and shift movements of the nucleic acid bases. These predictions are in accord with absorption, fluorescence emission, and scattering, and resonance Raman spectroscopic data on oligonucleotides and analogous aromatic complexes. The calculations suggest that major differences in intercalating coordinations are discernible in the near‐uv spectroscopic domain of proteins and nucleic acids.
AB - Low singlet transition energies and line strengths were calculated for the cytosine : in‐dole : guanine complex by the INDO/1S‐CI method. The chromophores were arranged in three sets of 270 intercalating geometries. Calculations were executed in the supermolecule model with single excited configurations. Errors due to basis set extension and incomplete configuration representation were assessed, for all chromophore pairs, by full BSSE correction calculations and inclusion of double‐excited configurations. The intercalation‐induced perturbations of the principal transitions are characterized by but not limited to (a) a decrease in strength of {π*,π} transitions, (b) increase in strength in {π*,n} transitions, (c) splitting of {π*,π} transitions into components of unequal strength, and (d) energy and strength dependence in mixed transitions on rise and shift movements of the nucleic acid bases. These predictions are in accord with absorption, fluorescence emission, and scattering, and resonance Raman spectroscopic data on oligonucleotides and analogous aromatic complexes. The calculations suggest that major differences in intercalating coordinations are discernible in the near‐uv spectroscopic domain of proteins and nucleic acids.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026881172&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026881172&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/bip.360320609
DO - 10.1002/bip.360320609
M3 - Article
C2 - 1643269
AN - SCOPUS:0026881172
SN - 0006-3525
VL - 32
SP - 667
EP - 694
JO - Biopolymers
JF - Biopolymers
IS - 6
ER -