TY - JOUR
T1 - Prostate cancer
T2 - more effective use of underutilized postoperative radiation therapy
AU - Motterle, Giovanni
AU - Morlacco, Alessandro
AU - Zattoni, Fabio
AU - Karnes, R. Jeffrey
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/4/2
Y1 - 2020/4/2
N2 - Introduction: Adverse pathological features at radical prostatectomy such as extracapsular extension, seminal-vesicle involvement, positive surgical margins and/or lymph node invasion define a particular subgroup of patients that might benefit from additional treatment after surgery, in particular radiation therapy. Areas covered: Post-prostatectomy radiation is intended as adjuvant, early-salvage or salvage depending on the timing and PSA levels at the treatment. After providing the most used definitions, the high-level evidence supporting adjuvant radiation is reviewed together with the limitations affecting its utilization. In recent years early-salvage radiation was hypothesized to be a non-inferior alternative based on good-quality retrospective data. Recently, preliminary results of ongoing trials provide additional evidence. In light of the need to identify patients that will truly benefit from adjuvant radiation, clinically based and molecular tools available for this purpose are reviewed. Expert opinion: In order to tailor treatment for the patient after radical prostatectomy, there is a need for a tool that could both improve the oncological outcomes and be cost-effective. To date, genomic testing provides the most promising results that will be reasonably improved in the coming years.
AB - Introduction: Adverse pathological features at radical prostatectomy such as extracapsular extension, seminal-vesicle involvement, positive surgical margins and/or lymph node invasion define a particular subgroup of patients that might benefit from additional treatment after surgery, in particular radiation therapy. Areas covered: Post-prostatectomy radiation is intended as adjuvant, early-salvage or salvage depending on the timing and PSA levels at the treatment. After providing the most used definitions, the high-level evidence supporting adjuvant radiation is reviewed together with the limitations affecting its utilization. In recent years early-salvage radiation was hypothesized to be a non-inferior alternative based on good-quality retrospective data. Recently, preliminary results of ongoing trials provide additional evidence. In light of the need to identify patients that will truly benefit from adjuvant radiation, clinically based and molecular tools available for this purpose are reviewed. Expert opinion: In order to tailor treatment for the patient after radical prostatectomy, there is a need for a tool that could both improve the oncological outcomes and be cost-effective. To date, genomic testing provides the most promising results that will be reasonably improved in the coming years.
KW - Adjuvant Radiation Therapy
KW - biochemical recurrence
KW - early salvage radiation therapy
KW - prostate cancer
KW - radical prostatectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082312038&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85082312038&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14737140.2020.1743183
DO - 10.1080/14737140.2020.1743183
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32182149
AN - SCOPUS:85082312038
SN - 1473-7140
VL - 20
SP - 241
EP - 249
JO - Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
JF - Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
IS - 4
ER -