Prospective trial of penicillamine in primary sclerosing cholangitis

Nicholas F. LaRusso, Russell H. Wiesner, Jurgen Ludwig, Robert L. MacCarty, Sandra J. Beaver, Alan R. Zinsmeister

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

141 Scopus citations

Abstract

We evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of penicillamine in primary sclerosing cholangitis. In a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial, 39 patients received penicillamine (250 mg t.i.d.) and 31 received a placebo. The two groups were highly comparable at entry with regard to clinical, biochemical, radiologic, and hepatic histologic features. Although a predictable cupruresis and a decrease in levels of hepatic copper were achieved in patients taking penicillamine, there was no beneficial effect on disease progression within 36 mo or on overall survival. Progressive symptoms, deterioration in serial hepatic laboratory values, or histologic progression on sequential liver biopsy specimens were similar in both groups, occurring in >80% of the entire study population. The development of major side effects led to the permanent discontinuation of penicillamine in 21% of the patients taking the drug. We conclude that the use of penicillamine in primary sclerosing cholangitis is not associated with a beneficial effect on disease progression or survival, and has considerable toxicity. The study also suggests that primary sclerosing cholangitis is a progressive disease in many patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1036-1042
Number of pages7
JournalGastroenterology
Volume95
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1988

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective trial of penicillamine in primary sclerosing cholangitis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    LaRusso, N. F., Wiesner, R. H., Ludwig, J., MacCarty, R. L., Beaver, S. J., & Zinsmeister, A. R. (1988). Prospective trial of penicillamine in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterology, 95(4), 1036-1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(88)90180-1