Prospective determination of distal colon findings in average-risk patients with proximal colon cancer

D. K. Rex, A. Chak, R. Vasudeva, T. Gross, D. Lieberman, I. Bhattacharya, E. Sack, M. Wiersema, F. Farraye, M. Wallace, D. Barrido, E. Cravens, L. Zeabart, D. Bjorkman, T. Lemmel, S. Buckley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

67 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Recent guidelines indicate that colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy are both acceptable options for screening average-risk patients for colorectal cancer. Retrospective studies have found that a majority of patients with cancer proximal to the splenic flexure have a normal screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective description of colonoscopic findings and family history in consecutive patients with proximal colon cancer. Results: Among 116 prospectively identified average-risk patients with cancer proximal to the splenic flexure, 40 (34.5%) had neoplasia distal to the splenic flexure. The prevalence of patients with adenomas greater than or equal to 1 cm, with only one tubular adenoma less than 1 cm, and with only hyperplastic polyps were 16.4%, 8.6%, and 6.9%, respectively. Conclusions: Most average-risk patients with cancer proximal to the splenic flexure will have a normal screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. These patients have an unexpectedly high prevalence of large distal adenomas, but the prevalence of both single small tubular adenomas and hyperplastic polyps alone is similar to that expected during screening of the general population. Clinicians and payers should continue to seek methods to improve the cost-effectiveness and availability of screening colonoscopy in average-risk persons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)727-730
Number of pages4
JournalGastrointestinal endoscopy
Volume49
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective determination of distal colon findings in average-risk patients with proximal colon cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this