Prospective Assessment of Peristomal Infections Using Objective Criteria

Manpreet S. Mundi, Sara Seegmiller, Jacob Davidson, Jill Schneckloth, Jessica Saied, Ryan T Hurt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Enteral nutrition (EN) is a safe and cost-effective intervention with significant morbidity and mortality benefit that can also be associated with complications. Peristomal infections can occur in 5%–30% of cases after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement. Despite this common occurrence, widespread use of objective diagnostic criteria is not prevalent, possibly leading to overuse of antibiotics. Methods: All patients who were reporting symptoms consistent with peristomal infection were evaluated. Criteria based on erythema, induration, and exudates were applied with cumulative score ≥8 indicating peristomal infection. All patients were followed, with additional factors being collected if available. Results: Forty-three patients noted complaints consistent with peristomal infection. In patients with a score <8 (n = 16), only 2 required antibiotics (12.5%) and 1 patient was hospitalized (6.3%). In patients with a score ≥8 (n = 27), 16 had a score of 8 or 9; all patients responded to antibiotics (100%), and 1 was hospitalized (6.3%). In patients with a score ≥10, all (100%) were treated with antibiotics. Five of 11 (45%) patients were hospitalized, with the most common diagnosis being sepsis. Of the baseline variables analyzed, higher body mass index correlated with score ≥10 (26.36 ± 2.94 vs 22.91 ± 4.35 in score <9, P =.0128). Conclusions: Objective criteria were effective in risk stratifying patients who presented with reports of peristomal infection. Patients with a score <8 tended to be at low risk, scores of 8–9 were of moderate risk, and patients with a score ≥10 were at high risk and required very close monitoring or hospitalization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)877-884
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Volume42
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Infection
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Gastrostomy
Enteral Nutrition
Exudates and Transudates
Erythema
Sepsis
Hospitalization
Body Mass Index
Morbidity
Costs and Cost Analysis
Mortality

Keywords

  • enteral
  • enteral access
  • GI access
  • home nutrition support
  • long-term care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Prospective Assessment of Peristomal Infections Using Objective Criteria. / Mundi, Manpreet S.; Seegmiller, Sara; Davidson, Jacob; Schneckloth, Jill; Saied, Jessica; Hurt, Ryan T.

In: Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 42, No. 5, 01.07.2018, p. 877-884.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mundi, Manpreet S. ; Seegmiller, Sara ; Davidson, Jacob ; Schneckloth, Jill ; Saied, Jessica ; Hurt, Ryan T. / Prospective Assessment of Peristomal Infections Using Objective Criteria. In: Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2018 ; Vol. 42, No. 5. pp. 877-884.
@article{dc4fe09891614c0d9b145a0382ccd91d,
title = "Prospective Assessment of Peristomal Infections Using Objective Criteria",
abstract = "Background: Enteral nutrition (EN) is a safe and cost-effective intervention with significant morbidity and mortality benefit that can also be associated with complications. Peristomal infections can occur in 5{\%}–30{\%} of cases after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement. Despite this common occurrence, widespread use of objective diagnostic criteria is not prevalent, possibly leading to overuse of antibiotics. Methods: All patients who were reporting symptoms consistent with peristomal infection were evaluated. Criteria based on erythema, induration, and exudates were applied with cumulative score ≥8 indicating peristomal infection. All patients were followed, with additional factors being collected if available. Results: Forty-three patients noted complaints consistent with peristomal infection. In patients with a score <8 (n = 16), only 2 required antibiotics (12.5{\%}) and 1 patient was hospitalized (6.3{\%}). In patients with a score ≥8 (n = 27), 16 had a score of 8 or 9; all patients responded to antibiotics (100{\%}), and 1 was hospitalized (6.3{\%}). In patients with a score ≥10, all (100{\%}) were treated with antibiotics. Five of 11 (45{\%}) patients were hospitalized, with the most common diagnosis being sepsis. Of the baseline variables analyzed, higher body mass index correlated with score ≥10 (26.36 ± 2.94 vs 22.91 ± 4.35 in score <9, P =.0128). Conclusions: Objective criteria were effective in risk stratifying patients who presented with reports of peristomal infection. Patients with a score <8 tended to be at low risk, scores of 8–9 were of moderate risk, and patients with a score ≥10 were at high risk and required very close monitoring or hospitalization.",
keywords = "enteral, enteral access, GI access, home nutrition support, long-term care",
author = "Mundi, {Manpreet S.} and Sara Seegmiller and Jacob Davidson and Jill Schneckloth and Jessica Saied and Hurt, {Ryan T}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jpen.1020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "877--884",
journal = "Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition",
issn = "0148-6071",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prospective Assessment of Peristomal Infections Using Objective Criteria

AU - Mundi, Manpreet S.

AU - Seegmiller, Sara

AU - Davidson, Jacob

AU - Schneckloth, Jill

AU - Saied, Jessica

AU - Hurt, Ryan T

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Background: Enteral nutrition (EN) is a safe and cost-effective intervention with significant morbidity and mortality benefit that can also be associated with complications. Peristomal infections can occur in 5%–30% of cases after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement. Despite this common occurrence, widespread use of objective diagnostic criteria is not prevalent, possibly leading to overuse of antibiotics. Methods: All patients who were reporting symptoms consistent with peristomal infection were evaluated. Criteria based on erythema, induration, and exudates were applied with cumulative score ≥8 indicating peristomal infection. All patients were followed, with additional factors being collected if available. Results: Forty-three patients noted complaints consistent with peristomal infection. In patients with a score <8 (n = 16), only 2 required antibiotics (12.5%) and 1 patient was hospitalized (6.3%). In patients with a score ≥8 (n = 27), 16 had a score of 8 or 9; all patients responded to antibiotics (100%), and 1 was hospitalized (6.3%). In patients with a score ≥10, all (100%) were treated with antibiotics. Five of 11 (45%) patients were hospitalized, with the most common diagnosis being sepsis. Of the baseline variables analyzed, higher body mass index correlated with score ≥10 (26.36 ± 2.94 vs 22.91 ± 4.35 in score <9, P =.0128). Conclusions: Objective criteria were effective in risk stratifying patients who presented with reports of peristomal infection. Patients with a score <8 tended to be at low risk, scores of 8–9 were of moderate risk, and patients with a score ≥10 were at high risk and required very close monitoring or hospitalization.

AB - Background: Enteral nutrition (EN) is a safe and cost-effective intervention with significant morbidity and mortality benefit that can also be associated with complications. Peristomal infections can occur in 5%–30% of cases after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement. Despite this common occurrence, widespread use of objective diagnostic criteria is not prevalent, possibly leading to overuse of antibiotics. Methods: All patients who were reporting symptoms consistent with peristomal infection were evaluated. Criteria based on erythema, induration, and exudates were applied with cumulative score ≥8 indicating peristomal infection. All patients were followed, with additional factors being collected if available. Results: Forty-three patients noted complaints consistent with peristomal infection. In patients with a score <8 (n = 16), only 2 required antibiotics (12.5%) and 1 patient was hospitalized (6.3%). In patients with a score ≥8 (n = 27), 16 had a score of 8 or 9; all patients responded to antibiotics (100%), and 1 was hospitalized (6.3%). In patients with a score ≥10, all (100%) were treated with antibiotics. Five of 11 (45%) patients were hospitalized, with the most common diagnosis being sepsis. Of the baseline variables analyzed, higher body mass index correlated with score ≥10 (26.36 ± 2.94 vs 22.91 ± 4.35 in score <9, P =.0128). Conclusions: Objective criteria were effective in risk stratifying patients who presented with reports of peristomal infection. Patients with a score <8 tended to be at low risk, scores of 8–9 were of moderate risk, and patients with a score ≥10 were at high risk and required very close monitoring or hospitalization.

KW - enteral

KW - enteral access

KW - GI access

KW - home nutrition support

KW - long-term care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049802674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049802674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jpen.1020

DO - 10.1002/jpen.1020

M3 - Article

C2 - 29611878

AN - SCOPUS:85049802674

VL - 42

SP - 877

EP - 884

JO - Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

JF - Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

SN - 0148-6071

IS - 5

ER -