Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: A paradigm shift in surgical staging

Andrea Mariani, Sean C. Dowdy, William A. Cliby, Bobbie S. Gostout, Monica B. Jones, Timothy O. Wilson, Karl C. Podratz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

579 Scopus citations


Objective: To prospectively assess pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer with lymphatic dissemination, emphasizing the examination of para-aortic metastases relative to the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). Methods: Over 36 months, 422 consecutive patients were managed by predefined surgical guidelines differentiating low-risk patients from patients at risk for dissemination requiring systematic lymphadenectomy. Low risk was defined as grade 1 or 2 endometrioid type with myometrial invasion (MI) ≤ 50% and primary tumor diameter (PTD) ≤ 2 cm. Pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes were submitted separately, with nodes identified from all 8 pelvic and 4 para-aortic node-bearing basins. Surgical quality assessments examined median node counts (primary surrogate for quality) and nodes harvested above and below the IMA and excised gonadal veins (secondary surrogates). Results: Lymphadenectomy was not required in 27% of patients (all low risk) and in 33% (n = 112) of endometrioid cases. However, 22 patients (20%) of this latter cohort had lymphadenectomy and all lymph nodes were negative. Sixty-three (22%) of 281 patients undergoing lymphadenectomy had lymph node metastases: both pelvic and para-aortic in 51%, only pelvic in 33%, and isolated to the para-aortic area in 16%. Therefore, 67% of patients with lymphatic dissemination had para-aortic lymph node metastases. Furthermore, 77% of patients with para-aortic node involvement had metastases above the IMA, whereas nodes in the ipsilateral para-aortic area below the IMA and ipsilateral common iliac basin were declared negative in 60% and 71%, respectively. Gonadal veins were excised in 25 patients with para-aortic node metastases; 7 patients (28%) had documented metastatic involvement of gonadal veins or surrounding soft tissue. Conclusions: The high rate of lymphatic metastasis above the IMA indicates the need for systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (vs sampling) up to the renal vessels. The latter should include consideration of excision of the gonadal veins. Conversely, lymphadenectomy does not benefit patients with grade 1 and 2 endometrioid lesions with MI ≤ 50% and PTD ≤ 2 cm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-18
Number of pages8
JournalGynecologic oncology
Issue number1
StatePublished - Apr 2008


  • Endometrial neoplasms
  • Lymph node excision
  • Lymphatic metastasis
  • Outcomes assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology


Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: A paradigm shift in surgical staging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this