TY - JOUR
T1 - Prospect of CAR T-cell therapy in acute myeloid leukemia
AU - Badar, Talha
AU - Manna, Alak
AU - Gadd, Martha E.
AU - Kharfan-Dabaja, Mohamed A.
AU - Qin, Hong
N1 - Funding Information:
T Badar has received developmental funds from Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; grant no. P30 CA015083. T Badar also served in advisory board for Pfizer Hematology and Oncology. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Introduction: Long-term outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains dismal, especially for those with high-risk disease or who are refractory to conventional therapy. CAR T-cell therapy provides unique opportunity to improve outcome by specifically targeting leukemia cells through genetically engineered T cells. Areas covered: We summarize the progress of CAR T-cells therapy in AML. We examine its shortcomings in AML therapy and the strategies that are being implemented to improve its safety and effectiveness. PubMed Central, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ASH annual meeting abstracts were searched. Search terms used to identify clinical trials were ‘CAR T-cells in AML’ OR CAR T-cells in leukemia”. Relevant clinical trials and CAR T-cell research data were reviewed from June 2009 till July 2021. Expert opinion: CAR T-cell therapy has shown promise as a novel therapy, but there are number of barriers to overcome to achieve its full therapeutic potential in AML. Targeting leukemia-specific antigen such as CLL1, to avoid myelotoxicity, incorporating checkpoint inhibitors to overcome leukemia-induced immunosuppression and allogenic CAR T cells to increase accessibility to patients with proliferative disease are among the strategies that are being explored to make CAR T cell a successful immunotherapy for patient with AML.
AB - Introduction: Long-term outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains dismal, especially for those with high-risk disease or who are refractory to conventional therapy. CAR T-cell therapy provides unique opportunity to improve outcome by specifically targeting leukemia cells through genetically engineered T cells. Areas covered: We summarize the progress of CAR T-cells therapy in AML. We examine its shortcomings in AML therapy and the strategies that are being implemented to improve its safety and effectiveness. PubMed Central, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ASH annual meeting abstracts were searched. Search terms used to identify clinical trials were ‘CAR T-cells in AML’ OR CAR T-cells in leukemia”. Relevant clinical trials and CAR T-cell research data were reviewed from June 2009 till July 2021. Expert opinion: CAR T-cell therapy has shown promise as a novel therapy, but there are number of barriers to overcome to achieve its full therapeutic potential in AML. Targeting leukemia-specific antigen such as CLL1, to avoid myelotoxicity, incorporating checkpoint inhibitors to overcome leukemia-induced immunosuppression and allogenic CAR T cells to increase accessibility to patients with proliferative disease are among the strategies that are being explored to make CAR T cell a successful immunotherapy for patient with AML.
KW - acute myeloid leukemia
KW - allogeneic CAR
KW - CAR T-cells
KW - CD123/CD33 CAR T-cells
KW - checkpoint inhibitors
KW - CLL1 CAR T-cells
KW - gene editing
KW - myelotoxicity secondary to AML CAR
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123831239&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123831239&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13543784.2022.2032642
DO - 10.1080/13543784.2022.2032642
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35051347
AN - SCOPUS:85123831239
SN - 1354-3784
VL - 31
SP - 211
EP - 220
JO - Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
JF - Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
IS - 2
ER -