TY - JOUR
T1 - Proposed risk-scoring model for estimating the prognostic impact of 1q gain in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
AU - Yang, Peiyu
AU - Chen, Haimin
AU - Liang, Xinyue
AU - Xu, Weiling
AU - Yu, Shanshan
AU - Huang, Wenyang
AU - Yi, Xingcheng
AU - Guo, Qiang
AU - Tian, Mengru
AU - Yue, Tingting
AU - Li, Mengyao
AU - Zhang, Yingjie
AU - Zhang, Mengxue
AU - Yan, Yurong
AU - Hu, Zhongli
AU - Kumar, Shaji K.
AU - Zhou, Fan
AU - Dai, Yun
AU - Jin, Fengyan
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank all participating clinicians and patients for their support to this study. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants #81471165, 81670190, 81670189, 81870160, 81971108, 82270207, and 82070226) and Science and Technology Development Program of the Jilin Province (Grants #20190201042JC, 20190201163JC, and 20210509010RQ), and Interdisciplinary Integration and Innovation Project of Jilin University.
Funding Information:
Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province, Grant/Award Numbers: 20190201042JC, 20190201163JC, 20210509010RQ; National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Numbers: 81471165, 81670189, 81670190, 81870160, 81971108, 82270207, 82070226; Interdisciplinary Integration and Innovation Project of Jilin University Funding information
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - 1q gain (+1q) is the most common high-risk cytogenetic abnormality (HRCA) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, its prognostic value remains unclear in the era of novel agents. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the impact of +1q on the outcomes of 934 patients newly diagnosed with MM. +1q was identified in 53.1% of patients and verified as an independent variate for inferior overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio, 1.400; 95% confidence interval, 1.097–1.787; p =.007). Concurrence of other HRCAs (particularly t(14;16) and del(17p)) further exacerbated the outcomes of patients with +1q, suggesting prognostic heterogeneity. Thus, a risk-scoring algorithm based on four risk variates (t(14;16), hypercalcemia, ISS III, and high LDH) was developed to estimate the outcomes of patients with +1q. Of the patients, 376 evaluable patients with +1q were re-stratified into low (31.6%), intermediate (61.7%), and high risk (6.7%) groups, with significantly different progression-free survival and OS (p <.0001), in association with early relapse of the disease. The prognostic value of this model was validated in the CoMMpass cohort. While attaining undetectable MRD largely circumvented the adverse impact of +1q, it scarcely ameliorated the outcome of the patients with high risk, who likely represent a subset of patients with extremely poor survival. Hence, patients with +1q are a heterogeneous group of high-risk patients, therefore underlining the necessity for their re-stratification. The proposed simple risk-scoring model can estimate the outcomes of patients with +1q, which may help guide risk-adapted treatment for such patients.
AB - 1q gain (+1q) is the most common high-risk cytogenetic abnormality (HRCA) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, its prognostic value remains unclear in the era of novel agents. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the impact of +1q on the outcomes of 934 patients newly diagnosed with MM. +1q was identified in 53.1% of patients and verified as an independent variate for inferior overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio, 1.400; 95% confidence interval, 1.097–1.787; p =.007). Concurrence of other HRCAs (particularly t(14;16) and del(17p)) further exacerbated the outcomes of patients with +1q, suggesting prognostic heterogeneity. Thus, a risk-scoring algorithm based on four risk variates (t(14;16), hypercalcemia, ISS III, and high LDH) was developed to estimate the outcomes of patients with +1q. Of the patients, 376 evaluable patients with +1q were re-stratified into low (31.6%), intermediate (61.7%), and high risk (6.7%) groups, with significantly different progression-free survival and OS (p <.0001), in association with early relapse of the disease. The prognostic value of this model was validated in the CoMMpass cohort. While attaining undetectable MRD largely circumvented the adverse impact of +1q, it scarcely ameliorated the outcome of the patients with high risk, who likely represent a subset of patients with extremely poor survival. Hence, patients with +1q are a heterogeneous group of high-risk patients, therefore underlining the necessity for their re-stratification. The proposed simple risk-scoring model can estimate the outcomes of patients with +1q, which may help guide risk-adapted treatment for such patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141570959&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85141570959&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ajh.26774
DO - 10.1002/ajh.26774
M3 - Article
C2 - 36309982
AN - SCOPUS:85141570959
SN - 0361-8609
VL - 98
SP - 251
EP - 263
JO - American Journal of Hematology
JF - American Journal of Hematology
IS - 2
ER -