Proposal of a New Adverse Event Classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee

Omid Khalilzadeh, Mark O. Baerlocher, Paul B. Shyn, Bairbre L. Connolly, A. Michael Devane, Christopher S. Morris, Alan M. Cohen, Mehran Midia, Raymond H. Thornton, Kathleen Gross, Drew M. Caplin, Gunjan Aeron, Sanjay Misra, Nilesh H. Patel, T. Gregory Walker, Gloria Martinez-Salazar, James E. Silberzweig, Boris Nikolic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

93 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a new adverse event (AE) classification for the interventional radiology (IR) procedures and evaluate its clinical, research, and educational value compared with the existing Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) classification via an SIR member survey. Materials and Methods: A new AE classification was developed by members of the Standards of Practice Committee of the SIR. Subsequently, a survey was created by a group of 18 members from the SIR Standards of Practice Committee and Service Lines. Twelve clinical AE case scenarios were generated that encompassed a broad spectrum of IR procedures and potential AEs. Survey questions were designed to evaluate the following domains: educational and research values, accountability for intraprocedural challenges, consistency of AE reporting, unambiguity, and potential for incorporation into existing quality-assurance framework. For each AE scenario, the survey participants were instructed to answer questions about the proposed and existing SIR classifications. SIR members were invited via online survey links, and 68 members participated among 140 surveyed. Answers on new and existing classifications were evaluated and compared statistically. Overall comparison between the two surveys was performed by generalized linear modeling. Results: The proposed AE classification received superior evaluations in terms of consistency of reporting (P < .05) and potential for incorporation into existing quality-assurance framework (P < .05). Respondents gave a higher overall rating to the educational and research value of the new compared with the existing classification (P < .05). Conclusions: This study proposed an AE classification system that outperformed the existing SIR classification in the studied domains.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Proposal of a New Adverse Event Classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Khalilzadeh, O., Baerlocher, M. O., Shyn, P. B., Connolly, B. L., Devane, A. M., Morris, C. S., Cohen, A. M., Midia, M., Thornton, R. H., Gross, K., Caplin, D. M., Aeron, G., Misra, S., Patel, N. H., Walker, T. G., Martinez-Salazar, G., Silberzweig, J. E., & Nikolic, B. (Accepted/In press). Proposal of a New Adverse Event Classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2017.06.019