Prophylactic perioperative antibiotic use in endoscopic sinus surgery

A systematic review and meta-analysis

Amy M. Saleh, Katherine M. Torres, Mohammad H Murad, Patricia J. Erwin, Colin L W Driscoll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context. Perioperative antibiotics are widely used to improve the outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery.Objective. The aim of this study was to summarize the evidence on the effect of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis on outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery.Data Sources and Review Methods. We searched electronic databases from inception through May 2011 for any relevant clinical trials or observational studies. Two reviewers working independently extracted study characteristics, quality, and the outcomes of interest. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the relative risks (RRs) and the standardized mean differences (SMDs) across trials.Results. We found 4 eligible trials with varying quality, of which 3 were included in the quantitative analysis. Antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the incidence of infections (relative risk, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 1.09), symptoms scores (SMD, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.46 to 0.38), and endoscopic scores (SMD, -0.09; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.13). The heterogeneity associated with the analysis was significant only for the outcome of change in symptoms score (I-squared values, 0%, 70%, and 0% for the 3 outcomes, respectively). Conclusions. Trial data available to date are unable to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in infection, symptom scores, or endoscopic scores to support the routine use of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics following endoscopic sinus surgery. Our analysis was limited by the number of published trials related to this topic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)533-538
Number of pages6
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)
Volume146
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Confidence Intervals
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Information Storage and Retrieval
Infection
Observational Studies
Clinical Trials
Databases
Incidence
Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • antibiotic prophylaxis
  • endoscopic sinus surgery
  • perioperative antibiotics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Prophylactic perioperative antibiotic use in endoscopic sinus surgery : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Saleh, Amy M.; Torres, Katherine M.; Murad, Mohammad H; Erwin, Patricia J.; Driscoll, Colin L W.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States), Vol. 146, No. 4, 04.2012, p. 533-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Saleh, Amy M. ; Torres, Katherine M. ; Murad, Mohammad H ; Erwin, Patricia J. ; Driscoll, Colin L W. / Prophylactic perioperative antibiotic use in endoscopic sinus surgery : A systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States). 2012 ; Vol. 146, No. 4. pp. 533-538.
@article{17e463b3b63a403d8505a09634b315e9,
title = "Prophylactic perioperative antibiotic use in endoscopic sinus surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Context. Perioperative antibiotics are widely used to improve the outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery.Objective. The aim of this study was to summarize the evidence on the effect of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis on outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery.Data Sources and Review Methods. We searched electronic databases from inception through May 2011 for any relevant clinical trials or observational studies. Two reviewers working independently extracted study characteristics, quality, and the outcomes of interest. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the relative risks (RRs) and the standardized mean differences (SMDs) across trials.Results. We found 4 eligible trials with varying quality, of which 3 were included in the quantitative analysis. Antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the incidence of infections (relative risk, 0.76; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 1.09), symptoms scores (SMD, -0.04; 95{\%} CI, -0.46 to 0.38), and endoscopic scores (SMD, -0.09; 95{\%} CI, 0.30 to 0.13). The heterogeneity associated with the analysis was significant only for the outcome of change in symptoms score (I-squared values, 0{\%}, 70{\%}, and 0{\%} for the 3 outcomes, respectively). Conclusions. Trial data available to date are unable to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in infection, symptom scores, or endoscopic scores to support the routine use of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics following endoscopic sinus surgery. Our analysis was limited by the number of published trials related to this topic.",
keywords = "antibiotic prophylaxis, endoscopic sinus surgery, perioperative antibiotics",
author = "Saleh, {Amy M.} and Torres, {Katherine M.} and Murad, {Mohammad H} and Erwin, {Patricia J.} and Driscoll, {Colin L W}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/0194599811434117",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "146",
pages = "533--538",
journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0194-5998",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prophylactic perioperative antibiotic use in endoscopic sinus surgery

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Saleh, Amy M.

AU - Torres, Katherine M.

AU - Murad, Mohammad H

AU - Erwin, Patricia J.

AU - Driscoll, Colin L W

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Context. Perioperative antibiotics are widely used to improve the outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery.Objective. The aim of this study was to summarize the evidence on the effect of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis on outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery.Data Sources and Review Methods. We searched electronic databases from inception through May 2011 for any relevant clinical trials or observational studies. Two reviewers working independently extracted study characteristics, quality, and the outcomes of interest. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the relative risks (RRs) and the standardized mean differences (SMDs) across trials.Results. We found 4 eligible trials with varying quality, of which 3 were included in the quantitative analysis. Antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the incidence of infections (relative risk, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 1.09), symptoms scores (SMD, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.46 to 0.38), and endoscopic scores (SMD, -0.09; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.13). The heterogeneity associated with the analysis was significant only for the outcome of change in symptoms score (I-squared values, 0%, 70%, and 0% for the 3 outcomes, respectively). Conclusions. Trial data available to date are unable to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in infection, symptom scores, or endoscopic scores to support the routine use of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics following endoscopic sinus surgery. Our analysis was limited by the number of published trials related to this topic.

AB - Context. Perioperative antibiotics are widely used to improve the outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery.Objective. The aim of this study was to summarize the evidence on the effect of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis on outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery.Data Sources and Review Methods. We searched electronic databases from inception through May 2011 for any relevant clinical trials or observational studies. Two reviewers working independently extracted study characteristics, quality, and the outcomes of interest. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the relative risks (RRs) and the standardized mean differences (SMDs) across trials.Results. We found 4 eligible trials with varying quality, of which 3 were included in the quantitative analysis. Antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the incidence of infections (relative risk, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 1.09), symptoms scores (SMD, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.46 to 0.38), and endoscopic scores (SMD, -0.09; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.13). The heterogeneity associated with the analysis was significant only for the outcome of change in symptoms score (I-squared values, 0%, 70%, and 0% for the 3 outcomes, respectively). Conclusions. Trial data available to date are unable to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in infection, symptom scores, or endoscopic scores to support the routine use of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics following endoscopic sinus surgery. Our analysis was limited by the number of published trials related to this topic.

KW - antibiotic prophylaxis

KW - endoscopic sinus surgery

KW - perioperative antibiotics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861681566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861681566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0194599811434117

DO - 10.1177/0194599811434117

M3 - Article

VL - 146

SP - 533

EP - 538

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

SN - 0194-5998

IS - 4

ER -