PROMIS for Laparoscopy

Juliane Bingener, Jeff A Sloan, Drew K. Seisler, Andrea L. McConico, Pamela E. Skaran, David R. Farley, Mark Truty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: We tested the responsiveness of the National Institutes of Health-sponsored Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Information System (PROMIS) global health short form and a linear analog self-assessment for laparoscopy. Methods: From May 2011 through December 2013, patients undergoing laparoscopy responded to patient reported outcome questionnaires perioperatively. Composite and single item scores were compared. Results: One hundred fifteen patients, mean age 55 years, 58 % female, were enrolled. Visual analog pain scores differed significantly from baseline (mean 1.7 ± 2.3) to postoperative day 1 (mean 4.8 ± 2.6) and 7 (mean 2.5 ± 2.1) (p < 0.0001). PROMIS physical subscale and total physical component subscore differed significantly from baseline (14.4 ± 3.0/47.4 ± 8.3) to postoperative day 1 (12.7 ± 3.2/42.1 ± 8.8) (p = 0.0007/0.0003), due to everyday physical activities (p = 0.0001). Linear analog self-assessment scores differed from baseline for pain frequency (p < 0.0001), pain severity (p < 0.0001), and social activity (p = 0.0052); 40 % of subjects reported worsening in PROMIS physical T-score to postoperative day 1 and 25 % to postoperative day 7. Linear analog self-assessment mental well-being scores were worse in 32 % of patients at postoperative day 7, emotional well-being in 28 %, social activity in 24 %, and fatigue in 20 % of patients. Conclusion: Single items and change from baseline are responsive perioperative quality of life assessments for laparoscopy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)917-926
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

Information Systems
Laparoscopy
Pain
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Fatigue
Quality of Life
Exercise
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Self-Assessment

Keywords

  • Fatigue
  • Laparoscopy
  • Pain
  • Patient reported outcome
  • Quality of life
  • Social activity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Bingener, J., Sloan, J. A., Seisler, D. K., McConico, A. L., Skaran, P. E., Farley, D. R., & Truty, M. (2015). PROMIS for Laparoscopy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 19(5), 917-926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2789-0

PROMIS for Laparoscopy. / Bingener, Juliane; Sloan, Jeff A; Seisler, Drew K.; McConico, Andrea L.; Skaran, Pamela E.; Farley, David R.; Truty, Mark.

In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vol. 19, No. 5, 01.05.2015, p. 917-926.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bingener, J, Sloan, JA, Seisler, DK, McConico, AL, Skaran, PE, Farley, DR & Truty, M 2015, 'PROMIS for Laparoscopy', Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 917-926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2789-0
Bingener J, Sloan JA, Seisler DK, McConico AL, Skaran PE, Farley DR et al. PROMIS for Laparoscopy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2015 May 1;19(5):917-926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2789-0
Bingener, Juliane ; Sloan, Jeff A ; Seisler, Drew K. ; McConico, Andrea L. ; Skaran, Pamela E. ; Farley, David R. ; Truty, Mark. / PROMIS for Laparoscopy. In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 19, No. 5. pp. 917-926.
@article{01aeccf93e7f43dcbcb9c5cee4241916,
title = "PROMIS for Laparoscopy",
abstract = "Introduction: We tested the responsiveness of the National Institutes of Health-sponsored Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Information System (PROMIS) global health short form and a linear analog self-assessment for laparoscopy. Methods: From May 2011 through December 2013, patients undergoing laparoscopy responded to patient reported outcome questionnaires perioperatively. Composite and single item scores were compared. Results: One hundred fifteen patients, mean age 55 years, 58 {\%} female, were enrolled. Visual analog pain scores differed significantly from baseline (mean 1.7 ± 2.3) to postoperative day 1 (mean 4.8 ± 2.6) and 7 (mean 2.5 ± 2.1) (p < 0.0001). PROMIS physical subscale and total physical component subscore differed significantly from baseline (14.4 ± 3.0/47.4 ± 8.3) to postoperative day 1 (12.7 ± 3.2/42.1 ± 8.8) (p = 0.0007/0.0003), due to everyday physical activities (p = 0.0001). Linear analog self-assessment scores differed from baseline for pain frequency (p < 0.0001), pain severity (p < 0.0001), and social activity (p = 0.0052); 40 {\%} of subjects reported worsening in PROMIS physical T-score to postoperative day 1 and 25 {\%} to postoperative day 7. Linear analog self-assessment mental well-being scores were worse in 32 {\%} of patients at postoperative day 7, emotional well-being in 28 {\%}, social activity in 24 {\%}, and fatigue in 20 {\%} of patients. Conclusion: Single items and change from baseline are responsive perioperative quality of life assessments for laparoscopy.",
keywords = "Fatigue, Laparoscopy, Pain, Patient reported outcome, Quality of life, Social activity",
author = "Juliane Bingener and Sloan, {Jeff A} and Seisler, {Drew K.} and McConico, {Andrea L.} and Skaran, {Pamela E.} and Farley, {David R.} and Mark Truty",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11605-015-2789-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "917--926",
journal = "Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery",
issn = "1091-255X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - PROMIS for Laparoscopy

AU - Bingener, Juliane

AU - Sloan, Jeff A

AU - Seisler, Drew K.

AU - McConico, Andrea L.

AU - Skaran, Pamela E.

AU - Farley, David R.

AU - Truty, Mark

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Introduction: We tested the responsiveness of the National Institutes of Health-sponsored Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Information System (PROMIS) global health short form and a linear analog self-assessment for laparoscopy. Methods: From May 2011 through December 2013, patients undergoing laparoscopy responded to patient reported outcome questionnaires perioperatively. Composite and single item scores were compared. Results: One hundred fifteen patients, mean age 55 years, 58 % female, were enrolled. Visual analog pain scores differed significantly from baseline (mean 1.7 ± 2.3) to postoperative day 1 (mean 4.8 ± 2.6) and 7 (mean 2.5 ± 2.1) (p < 0.0001). PROMIS physical subscale and total physical component subscore differed significantly from baseline (14.4 ± 3.0/47.4 ± 8.3) to postoperative day 1 (12.7 ± 3.2/42.1 ± 8.8) (p = 0.0007/0.0003), due to everyday physical activities (p = 0.0001). Linear analog self-assessment scores differed from baseline for pain frequency (p < 0.0001), pain severity (p < 0.0001), and social activity (p = 0.0052); 40 % of subjects reported worsening in PROMIS physical T-score to postoperative day 1 and 25 % to postoperative day 7. Linear analog self-assessment mental well-being scores were worse in 32 % of patients at postoperative day 7, emotional well-being in 28 %, social activity in 24 %, and fatigue in 20 % of patients. Conclusion: Single items and change from baseline are responsive perioperative quality of life assessments for laparoscopy.

AB - Introduction: We tested the responsiveness of the National Institutes of Health-sponsored Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Information System (PROMIS) global health short form and a linear analog self-assessment for laparoscopy. Methods: From May 2011 through December 2013, patients undergoing laparoscopy responded to patient reported outcome questionnaires perioperatively. Composite and single item scores were compared. Results: One hundred fifteen patients, mean age 55 years, 58 % female, were enrolled. Visual analog pain scores differed significantly from baseline (mean 1.7 ± 2.3) to postoperative day 1 (mean 4.8 ± 2.6) and 7 (mean 2.5 ± 2.1) (p < 0.0001). PROMIS physical subscale and total physical component subscore differed significantly from baseline (14.4 ± 3.0/47.4 ± 8.3) to postoperative day 1 (12.7 ± 3.2/42.1 ± 8.8) (p = 0.0007/0.0003), due to everyday physical activities (p = 0.0001). Linear analog self-assessment scores differed from baseline for pain frequency (p < 0.0001), pain severity (p < 0.0001), and social activity (p = 0.0052); 40 % of subjects reported worsening in PROMIS physical T-score to postoperative day 1 and 25 % to postoperative day 7. Linear analog self-assessment mental well-being scores were worse in 32 % of patients at postoperative day 7, emotional well-being in 28 %, social activity in 24 %, and fatigue in 20 % of patients. Conclusion: Single items and change from baseline are responsive perioperative quality of life assessments for laparoscopy.

KW - Fatigue

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Pain

KW - Patient reported outcome

KW - Quality of life

KW - Social activity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939956301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939956301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11605-015-2789-0

DO - 10.1007/s11605-015-2789-0

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 917

EP - 926

JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

SN - 1091-255X

IS - 5

ER -