TY - JOUR
T1 - Progesterone support for frozen embryo transfer
T2 - Intramuscular versus vaginal suppository demonstrates no difference in a cohort
AU - Leonard, Phoebe H.
AU - Hokenstad, Alexis N.
AU - Khan, Zaraq
AU - Jensen, Jani R.
AU - Stewart, Elizabeth A.
AU - Coddington, Charles C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Journal of Reproductive Medicine, Inc.
PY - 2015/4
Y1 - 2015/4
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pregnancy rates based on the route of progesterone replacement in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial and retrospective analysis. In the randomized group 76 FET cycles were randomized. In the retrospective group 508 FET cycles were reviewed. Intramuscular (IM) progesterone in oil 100 mg daily or oral micronized progesterone prior to transfer followed by compounded vaginal progesterone 200 mg 3 times daily (OV). The main outcome measure was the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not vary between groups in either cohort. In the randomized group there were no significant differences in CPR (31.43% vs. 21.05%) or live birth rate (LBR) (31.43% vs. 18.92%) for IM and OV progesterone replacement, respectively. In the retrospective cohort patients there were also no significant differences in CPR (35.56% vs. 32.35%) or LBR (32.23% vs. 28.51%) for the IM and OV progesterone replacement groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that either OV or IM progesterone is effective for luteal phase support for FETs.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pregnancy rates based on the route of progesterone replacement in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial and retrospective analysis. In the randomized group 76 FET cycles were randomized. In the retrospective group 508 FET cycles were reviewed. Intramuscular (IM) progesterone in oil 100 mg daily or oral micronized progesterone prior to transfer followed by compounded vaginal progesterone 200 mg 3 times daily (OV). The main outcome measure was the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not vary between groups in either cohort. In the randomized group there were no significant differences in CPR (31.43% vs. 21.05%) or live birth rate (LBR) (31.43% vs. 18.92%) for IM and OV progesterone replacement, respectively. In the retrospective cohort patients there were also no significant differences in CPR (35.56% vs. 32.35%) or LBR (32.23% vs. 28.51%) for the IM and OV progesterone replacement groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that either OV or IM progesterone is effective for luteal phase support for FETs.
KW - Assisted reproductive technology
KW - Frozen embryo transfer
KW - Infertility
KW - Luteal phase support
KW - Progesterone replacement
KW - Reproductive techniques
KW - Reproductive technologies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949742119&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949742119&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 25898472
AN - SCOPUS:84949742119
SN - 0024-7758
VL - 60
SP - 103
EP - 108
JO - Journal of Reproductive Medicine
JF - Journal of Reproductive Medicine
IS - 2
ER -