Proficiency of nerve conduction using standard methods and reference values (cl. NPhys Trial 4)

The CI. Nphys Trial 4 Investigators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The Cl. NPhys Trial 3 showed that attributes of nerve conduction (NC) were without significant intraobserver differences, although there were significant interobserver differences. Methods: Trial 4 tested whether use of written instructions and pretrial agreement on techniques and use of standard reference values, diagnostic percentile values, or broader categorization of abnormality could reduce significant interobserver disagreement and improve agreement among clinical neurophysiologists. Results: The Trial 4 modifications markedly decreased, but did not eliminate, significant interobserver differences of measured attributes of NC. Use of standard reference values and defined percentile values of abnormality decreased interobserver disagreement and improved agreement of judgment of abnormality among evaluators. Therefore, the same clinical neurophysiologist should perform repeat NCs of therapeutic trial patients. Conclusions: Differences in interobserver judgment of abnormality decrease with use of common standard reference values and a defined percentile level of abnormality, providing a rationale for their use in therapeutic trials and medical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)900-908
Number of pages9
JournalMuscle and Nerve
Volume50
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Neural Conduction
Reference Values
Therapeutic Uses
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Multicenter trial
  • Nerve conduction accuracy
  • Nerve conduction proficiency
  • Neuropathy impairment score
  • Reference values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Physiology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Proficiency of nerve conduction using standard methods and reference values (cl. NPhys Trial 4). / The CI. Nphys Trial 4 Investigators.

In: Muscle and Nerve, Vol. 50, No. 6, 01.12.2014, p. 900-908.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

The CI. Nphys Trial 4 Investigators. / Proficiency of nerve conduction using standard methods and reference values (cl. NPhys Trial 4). In: Muscle and Nerve. 2014 ; Vol. 50, No. 6. pp. 900-908.
@article{54fc4df9337546f2abbdedbcccde0667,
title = "Proficiency of nerve conduction using standard methods and reference values (cl. NPhys Trial 4)",
abstract = "Introduction: The Cl. NPhys Trial 3 showed that attributes of nerve conduction (NC) were without significant intraobserver differences, although there were significant interobserver differences. Methods: Trial 4 tested whether use of written instructions and pretrial agreement on techniques and use of standard reference values, diagnostic percentile values, or broader categorization of abnormality could reduce significant interobserver disagreement and improve agreement among clinical neurophysiologists. Results: The Trial 4 modifications markedly decreased, but did not eliminate, significant interobserver differences of measured attributes of NC. Use of standard reference values and defined percentile values of abnormality decreased interobserver disagreement and improved agreement of judgment of abnormality among evaluators. Therefore, the same clinical neurophysiologist should perform repeat NCs of therapeutic trial patients. Conclusions: Differences in interobserver judgment of abnormality decrease with use of common standard reference values and a defined percentile level of abnormality, providing a rationale for their use in therapeutic trials and medical practice.",
keywords = "Multicenter trial, Nerve conduction accuracy, Nerve conduction proficiency, Neuropathy impairment score, Reference values",
author = "{The CI. Nphys Trial 4 Investigators} and Litchy, {William J} and Albers, {James W.} and James Wolfe and Bolton, {Charles F.} and Nancy Walsh and Klein, {Christopher Jon} and Zafft, {Andrew J.} and Russell, {James W.} and Melanie Zwirlein and Overland, {Carol J.} and Davies, {Jenny L.} and Carter, {Rickey E.} and Dyck, {Peter J} and P. James and Dyck, {P. James B} and Low, {Phillip Anson} and Henning Andersen and England, {John D.} and Gareth Llewelyn and Mauermann, {Michelle M} and Wolfgang Singer and Dinesh Selvarajah and Solomon Tesfaye and Smith, {Gordon A.} and Adrian Vella",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/mus.24243",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "900--908",
journal = "Muscle and Nerve",
issn = "0148-639X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proficiency of nerve conduction using standard methods and reference values (cl. NPhys Trial 4)

AU - The CI. Nphys Trial 4 Investigators

AU - Litchy, William J

AU - Albers, James W.

AU - Wolfe, James

AU - Bolton, Charles F.

AU - Walsh, Nancy

AU - Klein, Christopher Jon

AU - Zafft, Andrew J.

AU - Russell, James W.

AU - Zwirlein, Melanie

AU - Overland, Carol J.

AU - Davies, Jenny L.

AU - Carter, Rickey E.

AU - Dyck, Peter J

AU - James, P.

AU - Dyck, P. James B

AU - Low, Phillip Anson

AU - Andersen, Henning

AU - England, John D.

AU - Llewelyn, Gareth

AU - Mauermann, Michelle M

AU - Singer, Wolfgang

AU - Selvarajah, Dinesh

AU - Tesfaye, Solomon

AU - Smith, Gordon A.

AU - Vella, Adrian

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Introduction: The Cl. NPhys Trial 3 showed that attributes of nerve conduction (NC) were without significant intraobserver differences, although there were significant interobserver differences. Methods: Trial 4 tested whether use of written instructions and pretrial agreement on techniques and use of standard reference values, diagnostic percentile values, or broader categorization of abnormality could reduce significant interobserver disagreement and improve agreement among clinical neurophysiologists. Results: The Trial 4 modifications markedly decreased, but did not eliminate, significant interobserver differences of measured attributes of NC. Use of standard reference values and defined percentile values of abnormality decreased interobserver disagreement and improved agreement of judgment of abnormality among evaluators. Therefore, the same clinical neurophysiologist should perform repeat NCs of therapeutic trial patients. Conclusions: Differences in interobserver judgment of abnormality decrease with use of common standard reference values and a defined percentile level of abnormality, providing a rationale for their use in therapeutic trials and medical practice.

AB - Introduction: The Cl. NPhys Trial 3 showed that attributes of nerve conduction (NC) were without significant intraobserver differences, although there were significant interobserver differences. Methods: Trial 4 tested whether use of written instructions and pretrial agreement on techniques and use of standard reference values, diagnostic percentile values, or broader categorization of abnormality could reduce significant interobserver disagreement and improve agreement among clinical neurophysiologists. Results: The Trial 4 modifications markedly decreased, but did not eliminate, significant interobserver differences of measured attributes of NC. Use of standard reference values and defined percentile values of abnormality decreased interobserver disagreement and improved agreement of judgment of abnormality among evaluators. Therefore, the same clinical neurophysiologist should perform repeat NCs of therapeutic trial patients. Conclusions: Differences in interobserver judgment of abnormality decrease with use of common standard reference values and a defined percentile level of abnormality, providing a rationale for their use in therapeutic trials and medical practice.

KW - Multicenter trial

KW - Nerve conduction accuracy

KW - Nerve conduction proficiency

KW - Neuropathy impairment score

KW - Reference values

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84912102923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84912102923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mus.24243

DO - 10.1002/mus.24243

M3 - Article

C2 - 24644133

AN - SCOPUS:84912102923

VL - 50

SP - 900

EP - 908

JO - Muscle and Nerve

JF - Muscle and Nerve

SN - 0148-639X

IS - 6

ER -