Principal-Component Analysis for Assessment of Population Stratification in Mitochondrial Medical Genetics

Alessandro Biffi, Christopher D. Anderson, Michael A. Nalls, Rosanna Rahman, Akshata Sonni, Lynelle Cortellini, Natalia S. Rost, Mar Matarin, Dena G. Hernandez, Anna Plourde, Paul I W de Bakker, Owen A Ross, Steven M. Greenberg, Karen L. Furie, James F Meschia, Andrew B. Singleton, Richa Saxena, Jonathan Rosand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although inherited mitochondrial genetic variation can cause human disease, no validated methods exist for control of confounding due to mitochondrial population stratification (PS). We sought to identify a reliable method for PS assessment in mitochondrial medical genetics. We analyzed mitochondrial SNP data from 1513 European American individuals concomitantly genotyped with the use of a previously validated panel of 144 mitochondrial markers as well as the Affymetrix 6.0 (n = 432), Illumina 610-Quad (n = 458), or Illumina 660 (n = 623) platforms. Additional analyses were performed in 938 participants in the Human Genome Diversity Panel (HGDP) (Illumina 650). We compared the following methods for controlling for PS: haplogroup-stratified analyses, mitochondrial principal-component analysis (PCA), and combined autosomal-mitochondrial PCA. We computed mitochondrial genomic inflation factors (mtGIFs) and test statistics for simulated case-control and continuous phenotypes (10,000 simulations each) with varying degrees of correlation with mitochondrial ancestry. Results were then compared across adjustment methods. We also calculated power for discovery of true associations under each method, using a simulation approach. Mitochondrial PCA recapitulated haplogroup information, but haplogroup-stratified analyses were inferior to mitochondrial PCA in controlling for PS. Correlation between nuclear and mitochondrial principal components (PCs) was very limited. Adjustment for nuclear PCs had no effect on mitochondrial analysis of simulated phenotypes. Mitochondrial PCA performed with the use of data from commercially available genome-wide arrays correlated strongly with PCA performed with the use of an exhaustive mitochondrial marker panel. Finally, we demonstrate, through simulation, no loss in power for detection of true associations with the use of mitochondrial PCA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)904-917
Number of pages14
JournalAmerican Journal of Human Genetics
Volume86
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 11 2010

Fingerprint

Medical Genetics
Principal Component Analysis
Population
Phenotype
Economic Inflation
Human Genome
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
Genome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Biffi, A., Anderson, C. D., Nalls, M. A., Rahman, R., Sonni, A., Cortellini, L., ... Rosand, J. (2010). Principal-Component Analysis for Assessment of Population Stratification in Mitochondrial Medical Genetics. American Journal of Human Genetics, 86(6), 904-917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.05.005

Principal-Component Analysis for Assessment of Population Stratification in Mitochondrial Medical Genetics. / Biffi, Alessandro; Anderson, Christopher D.; Nalls, Michael A.; Rahman, Rosanna; Sonni, Akshata; Cortellini, Lynelle; Rost, Natalia S.; Matarin, Mar; Hernandez, Dena G.; Plourde, Anna; de Bakker, Paul I W; Ross, Owen A; Greenberg, Steven M.; Furie, Karen L.; Meschia, James F; Singleton, Andrew B.; Saxena, Richa; Rosand, Jonathan.

In: American Journal of Human Genetics, Vol. 86, No. 6, 11.07.2010, p. 904-917.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Biffi, A, Anderson, CD, Nalls, MA, Rahman, R, Sonni, A, Cortellini, L, Rost, NS, Matarin, M, Hernandez, DG, Plourde, A, de Bakker, PIW, Ross, OA, Greenberg, SM, Furie, KL, Meschia, JF, Singleton, AB, Saxena, R & Rosand, J 2010, 'Principal-Component Analysis for Assessment of Population Stratification in Mitochondrial Medical Genetics', American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 904-917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.05.005
Biffi, Alessandro ; Anderson, Christopher D. ; Nalls, Michael A. ; Rahman, Rosanna ; Sonni, Akshata ; Cortellini, Lynelle ; Rost, Natalia S. ; Matarin, Mar ; Hernandez, Dena G. ; Plourde, Anna ; de Bakker, Paul I W ; Ross, Owen A ; Greenberg, Steven M. ; Furie, Karen L. ; Meschia, James F ; Singleton, Andrew B. ; Saxena, Richa ; Rosand, Jonathan. / Principal-Component Analysis for Assessment of Population Stratification in Mitochondrial Medical Genetics. In: American Journal of Human Genetics. 2010 ; Vol. 86, No. 6. pp. 904-917.
@article{39a3acaddd0149f5ba2f43847a8c3cc5,
title = "Principal-Component Analysis for Assessment of Population Stratification in Mitochondrial Medical Genetics",
abstract = "Although inherited mitochondrial genetic variation can cause human disease, no validated methods exist for control of confounding due to mitochondrial population stratification (PS). We sought to identify a reliable method for PS assessment in mitochondrial medical genetics. We analyzed mitochondrial SNP data from 1513 European American individuals concomitantly genotyped with the use of a previously validated panel of 144 mitochondrial markers as well as the Affymetrix 6.0 (n = 432), Illumina 610-Quad (n = 458), or Illumina 660 (n = 623) platforms. Additional analyses were performed in 938 participants in the Human Genome Diversity Panel (HGDP) (Illumina 650). We compared the following methods for controlling for PS: haplogroup-stratified analyses, mitochondrial principal-component analysis (PCA), and combined autosomal-mitochondrial PCA. We computed mitochondrial genomic inflation factors (mtGIFs) and test statistics for simulated case-control and continuous phenotypes (10,000 simulations each) with varying degrees of correlation with mitochondrial ancestry. Results were then compared across adjustment methods. We also calculated power for discovery of true associations under each method, using a simulation approach. Mitochondrial PCA recapitulated haplogroup information, but haplogroup-stratified analyses were inferior to mitochondrial PCA in controlling for PS. Correlation between nuclear and mitochondrial principal components (PCs) was very limited. Adjustment for nuclear PCs had no effect on mitochondrial analysis of simulated phenotypes. Mitochondrial PCA performed with the use of data from commercially available genome-wide arrays correlated strongly with PCA performed with the use of an exhaustive mitochondrial marker panel. Finally, we demonstrate, through simulation, no loss in power for detection of true associations with the use of mitochondrial PCA.",
author = "Alessandro Biffi and Anderson, {Christopher D.} and Nalls, {Michael A.} and Rosanna Rahman and Akshata Sonni and Lynelle Cortellini and Rost, {Natalia S.} and Mar Matarin and Hernandez, {Dena G.} and Anna Plourde and {de Bakker}, {Paul I W} and Ross, {Owen A} and Greenberg, {Steven M.} and Furie, {Karen L.} and Meschia, {James F} and Singleton, {Andrew B.} and Richa Saxena and Jonathan Rosand",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.05.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "904--917",
journal = "American Journal of Human Genetics",
issn = "0002-9297",
publisher = "Cell Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Principal-Component Analysis for Assessment of Population Stratification in Mitochondrial Medical Genetics

AU - Biffi, Alessandro

AU - Anderson, Christopher D.

AU - Nalls, Michael A.

AU - Rahman, Rosanna

AU - Sonni, Akshata

AU - Cortellini, Lynelle

AU - Rost, Natalia S.

AU - Matarin, Mar

AU - Hernandez, Dena G.

AU - Plourde, Anna

AU - de Bakker, Paul I W

AU - Ross, Owen A

AU - Greenberg, Steven M.

AU - Furie, Karen L.

AU - Meschia, James F

AU - Singleton, Andrew B.

AU - Saxena, Richa

AU - Rosand, Jonathan

PY - 2010/7/11

Y1 - 2010/7/11

N2 - Although inherited mitochondrial genetic variation can cause human disease, no validated methods exist for control of confounding due to mitochondrial population stratification (PS). We sought to identify a reliable method for PS assessment in mitochondrial medical genetics. We analyzed mitochondrial SNP data from 1513 European American individuals concomitantly genotyped with the use of a previously validated panel of 144 mitochondrial markers as well as the Affymetrix 6.0 (n = 432), Illumina 610-Quad (n = 458), or Illumina 660 (n = 623) platforms. Additional analyses were performed in 938 participants in the Human Genome Diversity Panel (HGDP) (Illumina 650). We compared the following methods for controlling for PS: haplogroup-stratified analyses, mitochondrial principal-component analysis (PCA), and combined autosomal-mitochondrial PCA. We computed mitochondrial genomic inflation factors (mtGIFs) and test statistics for simulated case-control and continuous phenotypes (10,000 simulations each) with varying degrees of correlation with mitochondrial ancestry. Results were then compared across adjustment methods. We also calculated power for discovery of true associations under each method, using a simulation approach. Mitochondrial PCA recapitulated haplogroup information, but haplogroup-stratified analyses were inferior to mitochondrial PCA in controlling for PS. Correlation between nuclear and mitochondrial principal components (PCs) was very limited. Adjustment for nuclear PCs had no effect on mitochondrial analysis of simulated phenotypes. Mitochondrial PCA performed with the use of data from commercially available genome-wide arrays correlated strongly with PCA performed with the use of an exhaustive mitochondrial marker panel. Finally, we demonstrate, through simulation, no loss in power for detection of true associations with the use of mitochondrial PCA.

AB - Although inherited mitochondrial genetic variation can cause human disease, no validated methods exist for control of confounding due to mitochondrial population stratification (PS). We sought to identify a reliable method for PS assessment in mitochondrial medical genetics. We analyzed mitochondrial SNP data from 1513 European American individuals concomitantly genotyped with the use of a previously validated panel of 144 mitochondrial markers as well as the Affymetrix 6.0 (n = 432), Illumina 610-Quad (n = 458), or Illumina 660 (n = 623) platforms. Additional analyses were performed in 938 participants in the Human Genome Diversity Panel (HGDP) (Illumina 650). We compared the following methods for controlling for PS: haplogroup-stratified analyses, mitochondrial principal-component analysis (PCA), and combined autosomal-mitochondrial PCA. We computed mitochondrial genomic inflation factors (mtGIFs) and test statistics for simulated case-control and continuous phenotypes (10,000 simulations each) with varying degrees of correlation with mitochondrial ancestry. Results were then compared across adjustment methods. We also calculated power for discovery of true associations under each method, using a simulation approach. Mitochondrial PCA recapitulated haplogroup information, but haplogroup-stratified analyses were inferior to mitochondrial PCA in controlling for PS. Correlation between nuclear and mitochondrial principal components (PCs) was very limited. Adjustment for nuclear PCs had no effect on mitochondrial analysis of simulated phenotypes. Mitochondrial PCA performed with the use of data from commercially available genome-wide arrays correlated strongly with PCA performed with the use of an exhaustive mitochondrial marker panel. Finally, we demonstrate, through simulation, no loss in power for detection of true associations with the use of mitochondrial PCA.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953123927&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953123927&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.05.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 20537299

AN - SCOPUS:77953123927

VL - 86

SP - 904

EP - 917

JO - American Journal of Human Genetics

JF - American Journal of Human Genetics

SN - 0002-9297

IS - 6

ER -