Prevalence and Sources of Errors in Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Provisioning

Cinthya Pena Orbea, Kara L. Dupuy-McCauley, Timothy Ian Morgenthaler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The prevalence and mechanism of medication errors have been well characterized in the literature. However, no prior studies have investigated the frequency and characteristics of errors in the positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy provisioning process when treating patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Just as medication errors may result in unwanted outcomes, it might be anticipated that errors in providing PAP to patients might lead to suboptimal outcomes. Our study seeks to examine the characteristics and frequency of PAP provisioning errors. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients in whom sleep-disordered breathing had been diagnosed and subsequently PAP therapy was prescribed. At a 90-day return visit, the PAP therapy the patient was receiving was compared with the intended therapy. Discrepancies were categorized as either prescribing errors (the prescription did not match the intended modality or settings), or setup errors (the modality or settings did not match the prescription). RESULTS: The overall PAP provisioning error rate was 8%, with errors most commonly occurring during the set-up process. In univariate analysis, insurance type (P = .003), treatment modality (P = .002), and device brand (P = .05) were associated with error and remained significant in multivariate analysis (model fit P = .002). Compliance, residual AHI, and difference in Epworth Sleepiness Scale were not affected by the presence of error. CONCLUSIONS: PAP provisioning errors are common and might contribute to poor treatment outcomes. Errors might be reduced by standardizing terminology across devices, standardizing prescription forms to improve clarity, and by enhanced quality assurance at durable medical equipment suppliers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)697-704
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 15 2019

Fingerprint

Research Design
Pressure
Prescriptions
Medication Errors
Sleep Apnea Syndromes
Therapeutics
Durable Medical Equipment
Equipment and Supplies
Insurance
Terminology
Compliance
Cohort Studies
Multivariate Analysis

Keywords

  • continuous positive airway pressure
  • medical errors
  • medication errors
  • prescriptions
  • sleep apnea syndromes
  • treatment outcome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Prevalence and Sources of Errors in Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Provisioning. / Orbea, Cinthya Pena; Dupuy-McCauley, Kara L.; Morgenthaler, Timothy Ian.

In: Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 5, 15.05.2019, p. 697-704.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{50a1bbddd94f4ab48ea46e9cae070601,
title = "Prevalence and Sources of Errors in Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Provisioning",
abstract = "STUDY OBJECTIVES: The prevalence and mechanism of medication errors have been well characterized in the literature. However, no prior studies have investigated the frequency and characteristics of errors in the positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy provisioning process when treating patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Just as medication errors may result in unwanted outcomes, it might be anticipated that errors in providing PAP to patients might lead to suboptimal outcomes. Our study seeks to examine the characteristics and frequency of PAP provisioning errors. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients in whom sleep-disordered breathing had been diagnosed and subsequently PAP therapy was prescribed. At a 90-day return visit, the PAP therapy the patient was receiving was compared with the intended therapy. Discrepancies were categorized as either prescribing errors (the prescription did not match the intended modality or settings), or setup errors (the modality or settings did not match the prescription). RESULTS: The overall PAP provisioning error rate was 8{\%}, with errors most commonly occurring during the set-up process. In univariate analysis, insurance type (P = .003), treatment modality (P = .002), and device brand (P = .05) were associated with error and remained significant in multivariate analysis (model fit P = .002). Compliance, residual AHI, and difference in Epworth Sleepiness Scale were not affected by the presence of error. CONCLUSIONS: PAP provisioning errors are common and might contribute to poor treatment outcomes. Errors might be reduced by standardizing terminology across devices, standardizing prescription forms to improve clarity, and by enhanced quality assurance at durable medical equipment suppliers.",
keywords = "continuous positive airway pressure, medical errors, medication errors, prescriptions, sleep apnea syndromes, treatment outcome",
author = "Orbea, {Cinthya Pena} and Dupuy-McCauley, {Kara L.} and Morgenthaler, {Timothy Ian}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "15",
doi = "10.5664/jcsm.7752",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "697--704",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine",
issn = "1550-9389",
publisher = "American Academy of Sleep Medicine",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence and Sources of Errors in Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Provisioning

AU - Orbea, Cinthya Pena

AU - Dupuy-McCauley, Kara L.

AU - Morgenthaler, Timothy Ian

PY - 2019/5/15

Y1 - 2019/5/15

N2 - STUDY OBJECTIVES: The prevalence and mechanism of medication errors have been well characterized in the literature. However, no prior studies have investigated the frequency and characteristics of errors in the positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy provisioning process when treating patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Just as medication errors may result in unwanted outcomes, it might be anticipated that errors in providing PAP to patients might lead to suboptimal outcomes. Our study seeks to examine the characteristics and frequency of PAP provisioning errors. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients in whom sleep-disordered breathing had been diagnosed and subsequently PAP therapy was prescribed. At a 90-day return visit, the PAP therapy the patient was receiving was compared with the intended therapy. Discrepancies were categorized as either prescribing errors (the prescription did not match the intended modality or settings), or setup errors (the modality or settings did not match the prescription). RESULTS: The overall PAP provisioning error rate was 8%, with errors most commonly occurring during the set-up process. In univariate analysis, insurance type (P = .003), treatment modality (P = .002), and device brand (P = .05) were associated with error and remained significant in multivariate analysis (model fit P = .002). Compliance, residual AHI, and difference in Epworth Sleepiness Scale were not affected by the presence of error. CONCLUSIONS: PAP provisioning errors are common and might contribute to poor treatment outcomes. Errors might be reduced by standardizing terminology across devices, standardizing prescription forms to improve clarity, and by enhanced quality assurance at durable medical equipment suppliers.

AB - STUDY OBJECTIVES: The prevalence and mechanism of medication errors have been well characterized in the literature. However, no prior studies have investigated the frequency and characteristics of errors in the positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy provisioning process when treating patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Just as medication errors may result in unwanted outcomes, it might be anticipated that errors in providing PAP to patients might lead to suboptimal outcomes. Our study seeks to examine the characteristics and frequency of PAP provisioning errors. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients in whom sleep-disordered breathing had been diagnosed and subsequently PAP therapy was prescribed. At a 90-day return visit, the PAP therapy the patient was receiving was compared with the intended therapy. Discrepancies were categorized as either prescribing errors (the prescription did not match the intended modality or settings), or setup errors (the modality or settings did not match the prescription). RESULTS: The overall PAP provisioning error rate was 8%, with errors most commonly occurring during the set-up process. In univariate analysis, insurance type (P = .003), treatment modality (P = .002), and device brand (P = .05) were associated with error and remained significant in multivariate analysis (model fit P = .002). Compliance, residual AHI, and difference in Epworth Sleepiness Scale were not affected by the presence of error. CONCLUSIONS: PAP provisioning errors are common and might contribute to poor treatment outcomes. Errors might be reduced by standardizing terminology across devices, standardizing prescription forms to improve clarity, and by enhanced quality assurance at durable medical equipment suppliers.

KW - continuous positive airway pressure

KW - medical errors

KW - medication errors

KW - prescriptions

KW - sleep apnea syndromes

KW - treatment outcome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066353556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066353556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5664/jcsm.7752

DO - 10.5664/jcsm.7752

M3 - Article

C2 - 31053209

AN - SCOPUS:85066353556

VL - 15

SP - 697

EP - 704

JO - Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine

JF - Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine

SN - 1550-9389

IS - 5

ER -