Prevalence and contents of advance directives of patients with ESRD receiving dialysis

Molly A. Feely, Daniel Hildebrandt, Jithinraj Edakkanambeth Varayil, Paul Mueller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and objectives ESRD requiring dialysis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates, including increased rates of cognitive impairment, compared with the general population. About one quarter of patients receiving dialysis choose to discontinue dialysis at the end of life.Advance directives are intended to give providers and surrogates instruction onmanagingmedical decision making, including end of life situations. The prevalence of advance directives is low among patients receiving dialysis. Little is known about the contents of advance directives among these patients with advance directives. Design, setting, participants, & measurements We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients receivingmaintenance in-center hemodialysis at a tertiary academicmedical center between January 1, 2007 and January 1, 2012. We collected demographic data, the prevalence of advance directives, and a content analysis of these advance directives. We specifically examined the advance directives for instructions on management of interventions at end of life, including dialysis. ResultsAmong 808 patients (mean age of 68.6 years old;men =61.2%), 49%had advance directives, ofwhich only 10.6% mentioned dialysis and only 3% specifically addressed dialysis management at end of life. Patients who had advance directives were more likely to be older (74.5 versus 65.4 years old; P<0.001) and have died during the study period (64.4% versus 46.6%; P<0.001) than patients who did not have advance directives. Notably, for patients receiving dialysis who had advance directives, more of the advance directives addressed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (44.2%),mechanical ventilation (37.1%), artificial nutrition and hydration (34.3%), and pain management (43.4%) than dialysis (10.6%). Conclusions Although one-half of the patients receiving dialysis in our study had advance directives, end of life management of dialysis was rarely addressed. Future research should focus on improving discernment and documentation of end of life values, goals, and preferences, such as dialysis-specific advance directives, among these patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2204-2209
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Volume11
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Advance Directives
Chronic Kidney Failure
Dialysis
Value of Life
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Pain Management
Artificial Respiration
Documentation

Keywords

  • Academic Medical Centers
  • Advance care planning
  • Advance directives
  • Advance Directives
  • Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Cognition Disorders
  • Death
  • Dialysis
  • Documentation
  • Goals
  • Humans
  • Kidney failure, chronic
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic
  • Male
  • Medical Records
  • Pain Management
  • Prevalence
  • Renal dialysis
  • Respiration, Artificial
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Terminal care
  • Terminal Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Nephrology
  • Transplantation

Cite this

Prevalence and contents of advance directives of patients with ESRD receiving dialysis. / Feely, Molly A.; Hildebrandt, Daniel; Varayil, Jithinraj Edakkanambeth; Mueller, Paul.

In: Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Vol. 11, No. 12, 01.01.2016, p. 2204-2209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Feely, Molly A. ; Hildebrandt, Daniel ; Varayil, Jithinraj Edakkanambeth ; Mueller, Paul. / Prevalence and contents of advance directives of patients with ESRD receiving dialysis. In: Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2016 ; Vol. 11, No. 12. pp. 2204-2209.
@article{0cec073c754941bab45ba734f5d882d0,
title = "Prevalence and contents of advance directives of patients with ESRD receiving dialysis",
abstract = "Background and objectives ESRD requiring dialysis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates, including increased rates of cognitive impairment, compared with the general population. About one quarter of patients receiving dialysis choose to discontinue dialysis at the end of life.Advance directives are intended to give providers and surrogates instruction onmanagingmedical decision making, including end of life situations. The prevalence of advance directives is low among patients receiving dialysis. Little is known about the contents of advance directives among these patients with advance directives. Design, setting, participants, & measurements We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients receivingmaintenance in-center hemodialysis at a tertiary academicmedical center between January 1, 2007 and January 1, 2012. We collected demographic data, the prevalence of advance directives, and a content analysis of these advance directives. We specifically examined the advance directives for instructions on management of interventions at end of life, including dialysis. ResultsAmong 808 patients (mean age of 68.6 years old;men =61.2{\%}), 49{\%}had advance directives, ofwhich only 10.6{\%} mentioned dialysis and only 3{\%} specifically addressed dialysis management at end of life. Patients who had advance directives were more likely to be older (74.5 versus 65.4 years old; P<0.001) and have died during the study period (64.4{\%} versus 46.6{\%}; P<0.001) than patients who did not have advance directives. Notably, for patients receiving dialysis who had advance directives, more of the advance directives addressed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (44.2{\%}),mechanical ventilation (37.1{\%}), artificial nutrition and hydration (34.3{\%}), and pain management (43.4{\%}) than dialysis (10.6{\%}). Conclusions Although one-half of the patients receiving dialysis in our study had advance directives, end of life management of dialysis was rarely addressed. Future research should focus on improving discernment and documentation of end of life values, goals, and preferences, such as dialysis-specific advance directives, among these patients.",
keywords = "Academic Medical Centers, Advance care planning, Advance directives, Advance Directives, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Clinical Decision-Making, Cognition Disorders, Death, Dialysis, Documentation, Goals, Humans, Kidney failure, chronic, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Medical Records, Pain Management, Prevalence, Renal dialysis, Respiration, Artificial, Retrospective Studies, Terminal care, Terminal Care",
author = "Feely, {Molly A.} and Daniel Hildebrandt and Varayil, {Jithinraj Edakkanambeth} and Paul Mueller",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2215/CJN.12131115",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "2204--2209",
journal = "Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology",
issn = "1555-9041",
publisher = "American Society of Nephrology",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence and contents of advance directives of patients with ESRD receiving dialysis

AU - Feely, Molly A.

AU - Hildebrandt, Daniel

AU - Varayil, Jithinraj Edakkanambeth

AU - Mueller, Paul

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Background and objectives ESRD requiring dialysis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates, including increased rates of cognitive impairment, compared with the general population. About one quarter of patients receiving dialysis choose to discontinue dialysis at the end of life.Advance directives are intended to give providers and surrogates instruction onmanagingmedical decision making, including end of life situations. The prevalence of advance directives is low among patients receiving dialysis. Little is known about the contents of advance directives among these patients with advance directives. Design, setting, participants, & measurements We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients receivingmaintenance in-center hemodialysis at a tertiary academicmedical center between January 1, 2007 and January 1, 2012. We collected demographic data, the prevalence of advance directives, and a content analysis of these advance directives. We specifically examined the advance directives for instructions on management of interventions at end of life, including dialysis. ResultsAmong 808 patients (mean age of 68.6 years old;men =61.2%), 49%had advance directives, ofwhich only 10.6% mentioned dialysis and only 3% specifically addressed dialysis management at end of life. Patients who had advance directives were more likely to be older (74.5 versus 65.4 years old; P<0.001) and have died during the study period (64.4% versus 46.6%; P<0.001) than patients who did not have advance directives. Notably, for patients receiving dialysis who had advance directives, more of the advance directives addressed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (44.2%),mechanical ventilation (37.1%), artificial nutrition and hydration (34.3%), and pain management (43.4%) than dialysis (10.6%). Conclusions Although one-half of the patients receiving dialysis in our study had advance directives, end of life management of dialysis was rarely addressed. Future research should focus on improving discernment and documentation of end of life values, goals, and preferences, such as dialysis-specific advance directives, among these patients.

AB - Background and objectives ESRD requiring dialysis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates, including increased rates of cognitive impairment, compared with the general population. About one quarter of patients receiving dialysis choose to discontinue dialysis at the end of life.Advance directives are intended to give providers and surrogates instruction onmanagingmedical decision making, including end of life situations. The prevalence of advance directives is low among patients receiving dialysis. Little is known about the contents of advance directives among these patients with advance directives. Design, setting, participants, & measurements We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients receivingmaintenance in-center hemodialysis at a tertiary academicmedical center between January 1, 2007 and January 1, 2012. We collected demographic data, the prevalence of advance directives, and a content analysis of these advance directives. We specifically examined the advance directives for instructions on management of interventions at end of life, including dialysis. ResultsAmong 808 patients (mean age of 68.6 years old;men =61.2%), 49%had advance directives, ofwhich only 10.6% mentioned dialysis and only 3% specifically addressed dialysis management at end of life. Patients who had advance directives were more likely to be older (74.5 versus 65.4 years old; P<0.001) and have died during the study period (64.4% versus 46.6%; P<0.001) than patients who did not have advance directives. Notably, for patients receiving dialysis who had advance directives, more of the advance directives addressed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (44.2%),mechanical ventilation (37.1%), artificial nutrition and hydration (34.3%), and pain management (43.4%) than dialysis (10.6%). Conclusions Although one-half of the patients receiving dialysis in our study had advance directives, end of life management of dialysis was rarely addressed. Future research should focus on improving discernment and documentation of end of life values, goals, and preferences, such as dialysis-specific advance directives, among these patients.

KW - Academic Medical Centers

KW - Advance care planning

KW - Advance directives

KW - Advance Directives

KW - Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

KW - Clinical Decision-Making

KW - Cognition Disorders

KW - Death

KW - Dialysis

KW - Documentation

KW - Goals

KW - Humans

KW - Kidney failure, chronic

KW - Kidney Failure, Chronic

KW - Male

KW - Medical Records

KW - Pain Management

KW - Prevalence

KW - Renal dialysis

KW - Respiration, Artificial

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Terminal care

KW - Terminal Care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021718958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021718958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2215/CJN.12131115

DO - 10.2215/CJN.12131115

M3 - Article

C2 - 27856490

AN - SCOPUS:85021718958

VL - 11

SP - 2204

EP - 2209

JO - Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

JF - Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

SN - 1555-9041

IS - 12

ER -