Pressure-flow responses to exercise in aortic stenosis, mitral regurgitation and diastolic dysfunction

Mads J. Andersen, Emil Wolsk, Rine Bakkestrøm, Nicolaj Christensen, Rasmus Carter-Storch, Massar Omar, Jordi S. Dahl, Peter H. Frederiksen, Barry Borlaug, Finn Gustafsson, Christian Hassager, Jacob E. Moller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Haemodynamic exercise testing is important for evaluating patients with dyspnoea on exertion and preserved ejection fraction. Despite very different pathologies, patients with pressure (aortic stenosis (AS)) and volume (mitral regurgitation (MR)) overload and diastolic dysfunction after recent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) reach similar filling pressure levels with exercise. The pressure-flow relationships (the association between change in cardiac output ( †CO) and change in pulmonary arterial wedge pressure ( †PAWP) may provide insight into haemodynamic adaptation to exercise in these groups. Methods and results: One hundred sixty-eight subjects aged >50 years with a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥50% underwent invasive exercise testing. They were enrolled in four different studies: AS (40 patients), AMI (52 patients), MR (43 patients) and 33 healthy subjects. Haemodynamic data were measured at rest, at 25 W, 75 W and at peak exercise. In all groups, PAWP increased with exercise. The greatest increase was observed in patients with AMI (from 12.7±3.9 mm Hg to 33.1±8.2 mm Hg, p<0.0001) and patients with AS (from 11.8±3.9 mm Hg to 31.4±6.1 mm Hg, p<0.0001), and the smallest was observed in healthy subjects (from 8.3±2.4 mm Hg to 21.1±7.5 mm Hg, p<0.0001). In all groups, the relative pressure increase was greatest at the beginning of the exercise. CO increased most in healthy patients (from 5.3±1.1 to 16.0±3.0 L/min, p<0.0001) and least in patients with AS (from 5.3±1.2 L/min to 12.4±2.6 L/min, p<0.0001). The pressure-flow relationships ( †PAWP/ †CO) and differed among groups (p=0.02). In all groups, the pressure-flow relationship was steepest in the initial phase of the exercise test. The AMI and AS groups (2.3±1.2 mm Hg/L/min and 3.0±1.3 mm Hg/L/min, AMI and AS, respectively) had the largest overall pressure-flow relationship; the healthy group had the smallest initially and at peak exercise (1.3±1.1 mm Hg/L/min) followed by MR group (1.9±1.4 mm Hg/L/min). Conclusion: The pressure-flow relationship was steepest in the initial phase of the exercise test in all groups. The pressure-flow relationship differs between groups. Trial registration numbers: NCT01974557, NCT01046838, NCT02961647 and NCT02395107.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberheartjnl-2022-321204
JournalHeart
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2022

Keywords

  • Aortic stenosis
  • Heart Failure, Diastolic
  • Mitral regurgitation
  • Myocardial Infarction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pressure-flow responses to exercise in aortic stenosis, mitral regurgitation and diastolic dysfunction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this