Preferential loading of the ACL compared with the MCL during landing: A novel in sim approach yields the multiplanar mechanism of dynamic Valgus during acl injuries

Carmen E. Quatman, Ata M. Kiapour, Constantine K. Demetropoulos, Ali Kiapour, Samuel C. Wordeman, Jason W. Levine, Vijay K. Goel, Timothy E. Hewett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Strong biomechanical and epidemiological evidence associates knee valgus collapse with isolated, noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. However, a concomitant injury to the medial collateral ligament (MCL) would be expected under valgus collapse, based on the MCLs anatomic orientation and biomechanical role in knee stability. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relative ACL to MCL strain patterns during physiological simulations of a wide range of high-risk dynamic landing scenarios. We hypothesized that both knee abduction and internal tibial rotation moments would generate a disproportionate increase in the ACL strain relative to the MCL strain. However, the physiological range of knee abduction and internal tibial rotation moments that produce ACL injuries are not of sufficient magnitude to compromise the MCLs integrity consistently. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A novel in sim approach was used to test our hypothesis. Seventeen cadaveric lower extremities (mean age, 45 6 7 years; 9 female and 8 male) were tested to simulate a broad range of landings after a jump under anterior tibial shear force, knee abduction, and internal tibial rotation at 25° of knee flexion. The ACL and MCL strains were quantified using differential variable reluctance transducers. An extensively validated, detailed finite element model of the lower extremity was used to help better interpret experimental findings. Results: Anterior cruciate ligament failure occurred in 15 of 17 specimens (88%). Increased anterior tibial shear force and knee abduction and internal tibial rotation moments resulted in significantly higher ACL:MCL strain ratios (P<.05). Under all modes of single-planar and multiplanar loading, the ACL:MCL strain ratio remained greater than 1.7, while the relative ACL strain was significantly higher than the relative MCL strain (P < .01). Relative change in the ACL strain was demonstrated to be significantly greater under combined multiplanar loading compared with anterior tibial shear force (P = .016), knee abduction (P = .018), and internal tibial rotation (P<.0005) moments alone. Conclusion: While both the ACL and the MCL resist knee valgus during landing, physiological magnitudes of the applied loads leading to high ACL strain levels and injuries were not sufficient to compromise the MCLs integrity. Clinical Relevance: A better understanding of injury mechanisms may provide insight that improves current risk screening and injury prevention strategies. Current findings support multiplanar knee valgus collapse as a primary factor contributing to a noncontact ACL injury.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)177-186
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Keywords

  • ACL
  • MCL
  • injury mechanism
  • knee
  • landing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Preferential loading of the ACL compared with the MCL during landing: A novel in sim approach yields the multiplanar mechanism of dynamic Valgus during acl injuries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this