TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictors of Unplanned Returns to the Operating Room within 30 Days in Neurosurgery
T2 - Insights from a National Surgical Registry
AU - Kerezoudis, Panagiotis
AU - Alvi, Mohammed Ali
AU - Spinner, Robert J.
AU - Meyer, Fredric B.
AU - Habermann, Elizabeth B.
AU - Bydon, Mohamad
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflict of interest statement: This publication was made possible by funding from the Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery and by CTSA Grant Number UL1 TR002377 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NIH.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - Background: In the modern, increasingly pay-for-performance era, unplanned return to the operating room (ROR) is gaining attention as a surgical quality metric. However, large-scale data on the appropriateness and usefulness of this measure in neurosurgery are scarce. Objective: To provide a comprehensive description of all RORs after neurosurgical procedures in a national surgical registry and identify factors associated with ROR. Methods: We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program multicenter database for patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures during 2012–2016. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify factors associated with 30-day unplanned ROR after the 3 most common inpatient cranial and spinal operations: craniotomy for intra-axial neoplasm, convexity/falx meningioma, or skull base tumors; anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; and posterior lumbar decompression and posterior lumbar fusion. Results: A total of 193,459 cases were identified, of which 7067 (3.7%) had at least 1 unplanned ROR within 30 days after the index procedure (inpatient, 4.3%; outpatient, 1.5%). Overall, the most common reasons were wound complication/surgical site infection (0.7%), hematoma evacuation (0.6%), and repeat surgery (0.5%). On multivariable analysis, the relative amount of variation in reoperation risk was found to be 1%–24% for demographics, 1%–19% for comorbidities, 1%–6% for preoperative laboratory values, and 4%–58% for operative characteristics. Conclusions: These findings may inform stakeholders on the optimal parameters that need to be taken into account when crafting, endorsing, and implementing quality metrics for neurosurgery that aim to assess surgical performance and reward or penalize hospitals and providers.
AB - Background: In the modern, increasingly pay-for-performance era, unplanned return to the operating room (ROR) is gaining attention as a surgical quality metric. However, large-scale data on the appropriateness and usefulness of this measure in neurosurgery are scarce. Objective: To provide a comprehensive description of all RORs after neurosurgical procedures in a national surgical registry and identify factors associated with ROR. Methods: We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program multicenter database for patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures during 2012–2016. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify factors associated with 30-day unplanned ROR after the 3 most common inpatient cranial and spinal operations: craniotomy for intra-axial neoplasm, convexity/falx meningioma, or skull base tumors; anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; and posterior lumbar decompression and posterior lumbar fusion. Results: A total of 193,459 cases were identified, of which 7067 (3.7%) had at least 1 unplanned ROR within 30 days after the index procedure (inpatient, 4.3%; outpatient, 1.5%). Overall, the most common reasons were wound complication/surgical site infection (0.7%), hematoma evacuation (0.6%), and repeat surgery (0.5%). On multivariable analysis, the relative amount of variation in reoperation risk was found to be 1%–24% for demographics, 1%–19% for comorbidities, 1%–6% for preoperative laboratory values, and 4%–58% for operative characteristics. Conclusions: These findings may inform stakeholders on the optimal parameters that need to be taken into account when crafting, endorsing, and implementing quality metrics for neurosurgery that aim to assess surgical performance and reward or penalize hospitals and providers.
KW - Cranial
KW - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
KW - Peripheral nerve
KW - Reoperation
KW - Return to the operating room
KW - Spinal
KW - Unplanned
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058930494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058930494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.171
DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.171
M3 - Article
C2 - 30500576
AN - SCOPUS:85058930494
SN - 1878-8750
VL - 123
SP - e348-e370
JO - World Neurosurgery
JF - World Neurosurgery
ER -