Predictors of esophageal stricture formation post endoscopic mucosal resection

Bashar Qumseya, Abraham M. Panossian, Cynthia Rizk, David Cangemi, Christianne Wolfsen, Massimo Raimondo, Timothy Woodward, Michael B. Wallace, Herbert Wolfsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Aims: Stricture formation is a common complication after endoscopic mucosal resection. Predictors of stricture formation have not been well studied. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational, descriptive study by using a prospective endoscopic mucosal resection database in a tertiary referral center. For each patient, we extracted the age, sex, lesion size, use of ablative therapy, and detection of esophageal strictures. The primary outcome was the presence of esophageal stricture at follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the association between the primary outcome and predictors. Results: Of 136 patients, 27% (n=37)had esophageal strictures. Thirty-two percent (n=44)needed endoscopic dilation to relieve dysphagia (median, 2; range, 1 to 8). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the size of the lesion excised is associated with increased odds of having a stricture (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.3; p=0.01), when controlling for age, sex, and ablative modalities. Similarly, the number of lesions removed in the index procedure was associated with increased odds of developing a stricture (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 4.2; p=0.007). Conclusions: Stricture formation after esophageal endoscopic mucosal resection is common. Risk factors for stricture formation include large mucosal resections and the resection of multiple lesions on the initial procedure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-161
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Endoscopy
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Esophageal Stenosis
Pathologic Constriction
Logistic Models
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Deglutition Disorders
Tertiary Care Centers
Observational Studies
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Dilatation
Regression Analysis
Databases

Keywords

  • Barrett esophagus
  • Complications
  • Endoscopy
  • Esophageal stenosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Qumseya, B., Panossian, A. M., Rizk, C., Cangemi, D., Wolfsen, C., Raimondo, M., ... Wolfsen, H. (2014). Predictors of esophageal stricture formation post endoscopic mucosal resection. Clinical Endoscopy, 47(2), 155-161. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2014.47.2.155

Predictors of esophageal stricture formation post endoscopic mucosal resection. / Qumseya, Bashar; Panossian, Abraham M.; Rizk, Cynthia; Cangemi, David; Wolfsen, Christianne; Raimondo, Massimo; Woodward, Timothy; Wallace, Michael B.; Wolfsen, Herbert.

In: Clinical Endoscopy, Vol. 47, No. 2, 2014, p. 155-161.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Qumseya, B, Panossian, AM, Rizk, C, Cangemi, D, Wolfsen, C, Raimondo, M, Woodward, T, Wallace, MB & Wolfsen, H 2014, 'Predictors of esophageal stricture formation post endoscopic mucosal resection', Clinical Endoscopy, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 155-161. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2014.47.2.155
Qumseya, Bashar ; Panossian, Abraham M. ; Rizk, Cynthia ; Cangemi, David ; Wolfsen, Christianne ; Raimondo, Massimo ; Woodward, Timothy ; Wallace, Michael B. ; Wolfsen, Herbert. / Predictors of esophageal stricture formation post endoscopic mucosal resection. In: Clinical Endoscopy. 2014 ; Vol. 47, No. 2. pp. 155-161.
@article{89d2675eb7a54596beefbf95fc7dfba0,
title = "Predictors of esophageal stricture formation post endoscopic mucosal resection",
abstract = "Background/Aims: Stricture formation is a common complication after endoscopic mucosal resection. Predictors of stricture formation have not been well studied. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational, descriptive study by using a prospective endoscopic mucosal resection database in a tertiary referral center. For each patient, we extracted the age, sex, lesion size, use of ablative therapy, and detection of esophageal strictures. The primary outcome was the presence of esophageal stricture at follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the association between the primary outcome and predictors. Results: Of 136 patients, 27{\%} (n=37)had esophageal strictures. Thirty-two percent (n=44)needed endoscopic dilation to relieve dysphagia (median, 2; range, 1 to 8). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the size of the lesion excised is associated with increased odds of having a stricture (odds ratio, 1.6; 95{\%} confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.3; p=0.01), when controlling for age, sex, and ablative modalities. Similarly, the number of lesions removed in the index procedure was associated with increased odds of developing a stricture (odds ratio, 2.3; 95{\%} confidence interval, 1.3 to 4.2; p=0.007). Conclusions: Stricture formation after esophageal endoscopic mucosal resection is common. Risk factors for stricture formation include large mucosal resections and the resection of multiple lesions on the initial procedure.",
keywords = "Barrett esophagus, Complications, Endoscopy, Esophageal stenosis",
author = "Bashar Qumseya and Panossian, {Abraham M.} and Cynthia Rizk and David Cangemi and Christianne Wolfsen and Massimo Raimondo and Timothy Woodward and Wallace, {Michael B.} and Herbert Wolfsen",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.5946/ce.2014.47.2.155",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "155--161",
journal = "Clinical Endoscopy",
issn = "2234-2400",
publisher = "Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictors of esophageal stricture formation post endoscopic mucosal resection

AU - Qumseya, Bashar

AU - Panossian, Abraham M.

AU - Rizk, Cynthia

AU - Cangemi, David

AU - Wolfsen, Christianne

AU - Raimondo, Massimo

AU - Woodward, Timothy

AU - Wallace, Michael B.

AU - Wolfsen, Herbert

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background/Aims: Stricture formation is a common complication after endoscopic mucosal resection. Predictors of stricture formation have not been well studied. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational, descriptive study by using a prospective endoscopic mucosal resection database in a tertiary referral center. For each patient, we extracted the age, sex, lesion size, use of ablative therapy, and detection of esophageal strictures. The primary outcome was the presence of esophageal stricture at follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the association between the primary outcome and predictors. Results: Of 136 patients, 27% (n=37)had esophageal strictures. Thirty-two percent (n=44)needed endoscopic dilation to relieve dysphagia (median, 2; range, 1 to 8). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the size of the lesion excised is associated with increased odds of having a stricture (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.3; p=0.01), when controlling for age, sex, and ablative modalities. Similarly, the number of lesions removed in the index procedure was associated with increased odds of developing a stricture (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 4.2; p=0.007). Conclusions: Stricture formation after esophageal endoscopic mucosal resection is common. Risk factors for stricture formation include large mucosal resections and the resection of multiple lesions on the initial procedure.

AB - Background/Aims: Stricture formation is a common complication after endoscopic mucosal resection. Predictors of stricture formation have not been well studied. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational, descriptive study by using a prospective endoscopic mucosal resection database in a tertiary referral center. For each patient, we extracted the age, sex, lesion size, use of ablative therapy, and detection of esophageal strictures. The primary outcome was the presence of esophageal stricture at follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the association between the primary outcome and predictors. Results: Of 136 patients, 27% (n=37)had esophageal strictures. Thirty-two percent (n=44)needed endoscopic dilation to relieve dysphagia (median, 2; range, 1 to 8). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the size of the lesion excised is associated with increased odds of having a stricture (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.3; p=0.01), when controlling for age, sex, and ablative modalities. Similarly, the number of lesions removed in the index procedure was associated with increased odds of developing a stricture (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 4.2; p=0.007). Conclusions: Stricture formation after esophageal endoscopic mucosal resection is common. Risk factors for stricture formation include large mucosal resections and the resection of multiple lesions on the initial procedure.

KW - Barrett esophagus

KW - Complications

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Esophageal stenosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897946628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897946628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5946/ce.2014.47.2.155

DO - 10.5946/ce.2014.47.2.155

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 155

EP - 161

JO - Clinical Endoscopy

JF - Clinical Endoscopy

SN - 2234-2400

IS - 2

ER -