TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of primary care depression outcomes at six months
T2 - Validation of DOC-6 ©
AU - Angstman, Kurt B.
AU - Garrison, Gregory M.
AU - Gonzalez, Cesar A.
AU - Cozine, Daniel W.
AU - Cozine, Elizabeth W.
AU - Katzelnick, David J
PY - 2017/5/1
Y1 - 2017/5/1
N2 - Background: The goal of this study was to develop and validate an assessment tool for adult primary care patients diagnosed with depression to determine predictive probability of clinical outcomes at 6 months. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 3096 adult patients enrolled in collaborative care management (CCM) for depression. Patients enrolled on or before December 31, 2013, served as the training set (n = 2525), whereas those enrolled after that date served as the preliminary validation set (n = 571). Results: Six variables (2 demographic and 4 clinical) were statistically significant in determining clinical outcomes. Using the validation data set, the remission classifier produced the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve with a c-statistic or area under the curve (AUC) of 0.62 with predicted probabilities than ranged from 14.5% to 79.1%, with a median of 50.6%. The persistent depressive symptoms (PDS) classifier produced an ROC curve with a c-statistic or AUC of 0.67 and predicted probabilities that ranged from 5.5% to 73.1%, with a median of 23.5%. Conclusions: We were able to identify readily available variables and then validated these in the prediction of depression remission and PDS at 6 months. The DOC-6 tool may be used to predict which patients may be at risk for worse outcomes.
AB - Background: The goal of this study was to develop and validate an assessment tool for adult primary care patients diagnosed with depression to determine predictive probability of clinical outcomes at 6 months. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 3096 adult patients enrolled in collaborative care management (CCM) for depression. Patients enrolled on or before December 31, 2013, served as the training set (n = 2525), whereas those enrolled after that date served as the preliminary validation set (n = 571). Results: Six variables (2 demographic and 4 clinical) were statistically significant in determining clinical outcomes. Using the validation data set, the remission classifier produced the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve with a c-statistic or area under the curve (AUC) of 0.62 with predicted probabilities than ranged from 14.5% to 79.1%, with a median of 50.6%. The persistent depressive symptoms (PDS) classifier produced an ROC curve with a c-statistic or AUC of 0.67 and predicted probabilities that ranged from 5.5% to 73.1%, with a median of 23.5%. Conclusions: We were able to identify readily available variables and then validated these in the prediction of depression remission and PDS at 6 months. The DOC-6 tool may be used to predict which patients may be at risk for worse outcomes.
KW - Depression
KW - Primary health care
KW - Retrospective studies
KW - ROC curve
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019165182&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019165182&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2017.03.160313
DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2017.03.160313
M3 - Article
C2 - 28484060
AN - SCOPUS:85019165182
SN - 1557-2625
VL - 30
SP - 281
EP - 287
JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
IS - 3
ER -