Prediction and detection models for acute kidney injury in hospitalized older adults

Rohit J. Kate, Ruth M. Perez, Debesh Mazumdar, Kalyan S Pasupathy, Vani Nilakantan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) occurs in at least 5 % of hospitalized patients and can result in 40-70 % morbidity and mortality. Even following recovery, many subjects may experience progressive deterioration of renal function. The heterogeneous etiology and pathophysiology of AKI complicates its diagnosis and medical management and can add to poor patient outcomes and incur substantial hospital costs. AKI is predictable and may be avoidable if early risk factors are identified and utilized in the clinical setting. Timely detection of undiagnosed AKI in hospitalized patients can also lead to better disease management. Methods: Data from 25,521 hospital stays in one calendar year of patients 60 years and older was collected from a large health care system. Four machine learning models (logistic regression, support vector machines, decision trees and native Bayes) along with their ensemble were tested for AKI prediction and detection tasks. Patient demographics, laboratory tests, medications and comorbid conditions were used as the predictor variables. The models were compared using the area under ROC curve (AUC) evaluation metric. Results: Logistic regression performed the best for AKI detection (AUC 0.743) and was a close second to the ensemble for AKI prediction (AUC ensemble: 0.664, AUC logistic regression: 0.660). History of prior AKI, use of combination drugs such as ACE inhibitors, NSAIDS and diuretics, and presence of comorbid conditions such as respiratory failure were found significant for both AKI detection and risk prediction. Conclusions: The machine learning models performed fairly well on both predicting AKI and detecting undiagnosed AKI. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study examining the difference between prediction and detection of AKI. The distinction has clinical relevance, and can help providers either identify at risk subjects and implement preventative strategies or manage their treatment depending on whether AKI is predicted or detected.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number39
JournalBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Acute Kidney Injury
ROC Curve
Area Under Curve
Logistic Models
Decision Trees
Hospital Costs
Drug Combinations
Disease Management
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Diuretics
Respiratory Insufficiency
Length of Stay
Demography
Morbidity
Delivery of Health Care
Kidney

Keywords

  • Acute kidney injury (AKI)
  • Detection
  • Elderly
  • Machine learning
  • Modeling
  • Prediction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Prediction and detection models for acute kidney injury in hospitalized older adults. / Kate, Rohit J.; Perez, Ruth M.; Mazumdar, Debesh; Pasupathy, Kalyan S; Nilakantan, Vani.

In: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Vol. 16, No. 1, 39, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kate, Rohit J. ; Perez, Ruth M. ; Mazumdar, Debesh ; Pasupathy, Kalyan S ; Nilakantan, Vani. / Prediction and detection models for acute kidney injury in hospitalized older adults. In: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2016 ; Vol. 16, No. 1.
@article{207e060ef57548adb271876a80efeaa1,
title = "Prediction and detection models for acute kidney injury in hospitalized older adults",
abstract = "Background: Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) occurs in at least 5 {\%} of hospitalized patients and can result in 40-70 {\%} morbidity and mortality. Even following recovery, many subjects may experience progressive deterioration of renal function. The heterogeneous etiology and pathophysiology of AKI complicates its diagnosis and medical management and can add to poor patient outcomes and incur substantial hospital costs. AKI is predictable and may be avoidable if early risk factors are identified and utilized in the clinical setting. Timely detection of undiagnosed AKI in hospitalized patients can also lead to better disease management. Methods: Data from 25,521 hospital stays in one calendar year of patients 60 years and older was collected from a large health care system. Four machine learning models (logistic regression, support vector machines, decision trees and native Bayes) along with their ensemble were tested for AKI prediction and detection tasks. Patient demographics, laboratory tests, medications and comorbid conditions were used as the predictor variables. The models were compared using the area under ROC curve (AUC) evaluation metric. Results: Logistic regression performed the best for AKI detection (AUC 0.743) and was a close second to the ensemble for AKI prediction (AUC ensemble: 0.664, AUC logistic regression: 0.660). History of prior AKI, use of combination drugs such as ACE inhibitors, NSAIDS and diuretics, and presence of comorbid conditions such as respiratory failure were found significant for both AKI detection and risk prediction. Conclusions: The machine learning models performed fairly well on both predicting AKI and detecting undiagnosed AKI. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study examining the difference between prediction and detection of AKI. The distinction has clinical relevance, and can help providers either identify at risk subjects and implement preventative strategies or manage their treatment depending on whether AKI is predicted or detected.",
keywords = "Acute kidney injury (AKI), Detection, Elderly, Machine learning, Modeling, Prediction",
author = "Kate, {Rohit J.} and Perez, {Ruth M.} and Debesh Mazumdar and Pasupathy, {Kalyan S} and Vani Nilakantan",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1186/s12911-016-0277-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
journal = "BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making",
issn = "1472-6947",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prediction and detection models for acute kidney injury in hospitalized older adults

AU - Kate, Rohit J.

AU - Perez, Ruth M.

AU - Mazumdar, Debesh

AU - Pasupathy, Kalyan S

AU - Nilakantan, Vani

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Background: Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) occurs in at least 5 % of hospitalized patients and can result in 40-70 % morbidity and mortality. Even following recovery, many subjects may experience progressive deterioration of renal function. The heterogeneous etiology and pathophysiology of AKI complicates its diagnosis and medical management and can add to poor patient outcomes and incur substantial hospital costs. AKI is predictable and may be avoidable if early risk factors are identified and utilized in the clinical setting. Timely detection of undiagnosed AKI in hospitalized patients can also lead to better disease management. Methods: Data from 25,521 hospital stays in one calendar year of patients 60 years and older was collected from a large health care system. Four machine learning models (logistic regression, support vector machines, decision trees and native Bayes) along with their ensemble were tested for AKI prediction and detection tasks. Patient demographics, laboratory tests, medications and comorbid conditions were used as the predictor variables. The models were compared using the area under ROC curve (AUC) evaluation metric. Results: Logistic regression performed the best for AKI detection (AUC 0.743) and was a close second to the ensemble for AKI prediction (AUC ensemble: 0.664, AUC logistic regression: 0.660). History of prior AKI, use of combination drugs such as ACE inhibitors, NSAIDS and diuretics, and presence of comorbid conditions such as respiratory failure were found significant for both AKI detection and risk prediction. Conclusions: The machine learning models performed fairly well on both predicting AKI and detecting undiagnosed AKI. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study examining the difference between prediction and detection of AKI. The distinction has clinical relevance, and can help providers either identify at risk subjects and implement preventative strategies or manage their treatment depending on whether AKI is predicted or detected.

AB - Background: Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) occurs in at least 5 % of hospitalized patients and can result in 40-70 % morbidity and mortality. Even following recovery, many subjects may experience progressive deterioration of renal function. The heterogeneous etiology and pathophysiology of AKI complicates its diagnosis and medical management and can add to poor patient outcomes and incur substantial hospital costs. AKI is predictable and may be avoidable if early risk factors are identified and utilized in the clinical setting. Timely detection of undiagnosed AKI in hospitalized patients can also lead to better disease management. Methods: Data from 25,521 hospital stays in one calendar year of patients 60 years and older was collected from a large health care system. Four machine learning models (logistic regression, support vector machines, decision trees and native Bayes) along with their ensemble were tested for AKI prediction and detection tasks. Patient demographics, laboratory tests, medications and comorbid conditions were used as the predictor variables. The models were compared using the area under ROC curve (AUC) evaluation metric. Results: Logistic regression performed the best for AKI detection (AUC 0.743) and was a close second to the ensemble for AKI prediction (AUC ensemble: 0.664, AUC logistic regression: 0.660). History of prior AKI, use of combination drugs such as ACE inhibitors, NSAIDS and diuretics, and presence of comorbid conditions such as respiratory failure were found significant for both AKI detection and risk prediction. Conclusions: The machine learning models performed fairly well on both predicting AKI and detecting undiagnosed AKI. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study examining the difference between prediction and detection of AKI. The distinction has clinical relevance, and can help providers either identify at risk subjects and implement preventative strategies or manage their treatment depending on whether AKI is predicted or detected.

KW - Acute kidney injury (AKI)

KW - Detection

KW - Elderly

KW - Machine learning

KW - Modeling

KW - Prediction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007609237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007609237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12911-016-0277-4

DO - 10.1186/s12911-016-0277-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 27025458

AN - SCOPUS:85007609237

VL - 16

JO - BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

JF - BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

SN - 1472-6947

IS - 1

M1 - 39

ER -