TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Bladder Cancer
AU - Motterle, Giovanni
AU - Andrews, Jack R.
AU - Morlacco, Alessandro
AU - Karnes, R. Jeffrey
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 European Association of Urology
PY - 2020/7/15
Y1 - 2020/7/15
N2 - Context: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is recommended prior to radical cystectomy in the setting of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Despite a 5–10% survival benefit, some patients do not respond to NAC. Identification of the nonresponders could avoid side effects and delay in surgery. Objective: The objective of this review is to summarize the latest evidence regarding predictors of NAC response. Evidence acquisition: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for published studies including clinical, pathological, molecular, and imaging tests or factors that can be applied before or during NAC to predict its results. Evidence synthesis: Patient characteristics and imaging techniques seem to have minimal utility to predict NAC response. Only advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques seem to have a potential role. There is insufficient evidence to suggest a change in NAC paradigm for variant histology, whereas the most promising results come from molecular characterization of tumors. Conclusions: No validated instrument currently exists to predict NAC response. While awaiting further evidence, no strong recommendation can be made toward a shift in paradigm. Patient summary: The most effective and aggressive treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is radical cystectomy preceded by effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In this paper, we reviewed the current literature and published evidence to identify predictors of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. To date, no instrument exists to predict which patients will respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The most effective treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is radical cystectomy preceded by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We reviewed the literature to identify predictors of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. To date, no instrument exists predicting which patients will respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
AB - Context: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is recommended prior to radical cystectomy in the setting of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Despite a 5–10% survival benefit, some patients do not respond to NAC. Identification of the nonresponders could avoid side effects and delay in surgery. Objective: The objective of this review is to summarize the latest evidence regarding predictors of NAC response. Evidence acquisition: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for published studies including clinical, pathological, molecular, and imaging tests or factors that can be applied before or during NAC to predict its results. Evidence synthesis: Patient characteristics and imaging techniques seem to have minimal utility to predict NAC response. Only advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques seem to have a potential role. There is insufficient evidence to suggest a change in NAC paradigm for variant histology, whereas the most promising results come from molecular characterization of tumors. Conclusions: No validated instrument currently exists to predict NAC response. While awaiting further evidence, no strong recommendation can be made toward a shift in paradigm. Patient summary: The most effective and aggressive treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is radical cystectomy preceded by effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In this paper, we reviewed the current literature and published evidence to identify predictors of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. To date, no instrument exists to predict which patients will respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The most effective treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is radical cystectomy preceded by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We reviewed the literature to identify predictors of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. To date, no instrument exists predicting which patients will respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
KW - Bladder cancer
KW - Molecular subtypes
KW - Muscle-invasive bladder cancer
KW - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
KW - Predictors of response
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075351724&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075351724&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.euf.2019.10.016
DO - 10.1016/j.euf.2019.10.016
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31708469
AN - SCOPUS:85075351724
SN - 2405-4569
VL - 6
SP - 642
EP - 649
JO - European Urology Focus
JF - European Urology Focus
IS - 4
ER -